Citation: | Huang Xitai, Xie Jinzhao, Cai Jianpeng, et al. Analysis of the short‑term outcomes of robot‑assisted pancreatoduodenectomy performed by one single surgeon[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2024, 23(4): 596-600. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20240222-00125 |
To investigate the short‑term outcomes of robot-assisted pancreato-duodenectomy (RPD) performed by one single surgeon.
The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinico-pathological data of 240 patients who were performed RPD by one single surgeon at The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‑sen University from July 2016 to October 2023 were collected. There were 130 males and 110 females, aged 59(19)years. All RPD were performed by the same surgeon. Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations; (2) postoperative pathological examination and outcome of patients. Measurement data with normal distribution were expressed as Mean±SD, and measurement data with skewed distribution were expressed as M(IQR). Count data were expressed as absolute numbers or percentages.
(1) Surgical situations. Of 240 patients, 15 cases underwent combined vascular resection and reconstruction, and 13 patients were combined with other operations simultaneously. Of 240 patients, 4 cases converted to open surgery, with the conversion rate as 1.67%. The operation time of 240 patients was 458(152)minutes, volume of intraopera-tive blood loss was 50(50)mL, intraoperative erythrocyte transfusion was required in 17 patients. The R0 resection rate was 99.17%(238/240), the number of lymph nodes harvested was 10(6) and duration of postoperative hospital stay was 17(12)days. (2) Postoperative pathological examination and outcome of patients. Of 240 patients, 51 cases were pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, 41 cases were ampullary carcinoma, 41 cases were neuroendocrine neoplasms, 35 cases were pancreatic cystic neoplasms, 28 cases were duodenal carcinoma and 44 cases were other pathologic types. Of 99 patients with major complications, there were 57 cases with clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, 44 cases with postoperative delayed gastric empty, 11 cases with postoperative biliary fistula, 8 cases with postoperative chyle fistula, 14 cases with incision infec-tion, and 24 cases with postoperative hemorrhage. Multiple complications might occur to the same patient. Reoperation was performed in 6 of the 240 patients. One patient died within 30 days after surgery. Twenty-four patients returned to hospital within 30 days after discharge.
RPD performed by one single surgeon is safe and feasible, with favorable short‑term outcomes, which can be performed in medical centers with experiences in robot‑assisted pancreatic surgery.
[1] |
YinT, QinT, WeiK, et al. Comparison of safety and effectiveness between laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta‑analysis[J]. Int J Surg,2022,105:106799. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106799.
|
[2] |
de RooijT, LuMZ, SteenMW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: systematic review and meta‑analysis of comparative cohort and registry studies[J]. Ann Surg,2016,264(2):257‑267. DOI:10.1097/SLA.000 0000000001660.
|
[3] |
张涛,杨建武,李连勇,等.机器人手术系统与开腹胰十二指肠切除术围手术期疗效的Meta分析[J].中华消化外科杂志,2022,21(11):1482‑1490. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn1156 10-20220925-00546.
|
[4] |
代鑫,刘汉林,王强,等.达芬奇机器人与传统腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术近期疗效及安全性比较的Meta分析[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2022,38(5):1106-1113. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.05.025.
|
[5] |
OuyangL, ZhangJ, FengQ, et al. Robotic versus laparosco-pic pancreaticoduodenectomy: an up‑to‑date system review and meta‑analysis[J]. Front Oncol,2022,12:834382. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.834382.
|
[6] |
KhachfeHH, NassourI, HammadAY, et al. Robotic pancrea⁃ticoduodenectomy: increased adoption and improved outcomes: is laparoscopy still justified?[J]. Ann Surg,2023,278(3):e563‑e569. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005687.
|
[7] |
HuangXT, WangXY, XieJZ, et al. Learning curves of resection and reconstruction procedures in robotic‑assisted pancreatoduodenectomy by a single surgeon: a retrospective cohort study of 160 consecutive cases[J]. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf),2023,11:goad042. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goad042.
|
[8] |
HuangXT, QuXF, ZhouJW, et al. Robotic‑assisted organ-preserving or parenchymal‑sparing pancreatectomy in pan⁃creatic benign or low‑grade malignant tumors: a single institute′s experience[J]. J Robot Surg,2024,18(1):1. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01787-5.
|
[9] |
ClavienPA, BarkunJ, de OliveiraML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five‑year experience[J]. Ann Surg,2009,250(2):187‑196. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.
|
[10] |
BassiC, MarchegianiG, DervenisC, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after[J]. Surgery,2017,161(3):584‑591. DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2016. 11.014.
|
[11] |
ShiY, WangW, QiuW, et al. Learning curve from 450 cases of robot‑assisted pancreaticoduocectomy in a high-volume pancreatic center: optimization of operative procedure and a retrospective study[J]. Ann Surg,2021,274(6):e1277‑e1283. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003664.
|
[12] |
BooneBA, ZenatiM, HoggME, et al. Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the learning curve[J]. JAMA Surg,2015,150(5):416‑422. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.17.
|
[13] |
MederosMA, StarrS, ParkJY, et al. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: a propensity score‑matched analysis[J]. HPB (Oxford),2023,25(3):301‑310. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.11.011.
|
[14] |
LiJ, QianL, ShiY, et al. Short‑term outcomes between robot‑assisted and open pancreaticoduodenectomy in pati-ents with high body mass index: a propensity score mat-ched study[J]. Cancer Med,2023,12(14):15141‑15148. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6186.
|
[15] |
蔡建鹏,陈伟,王曦域,等.机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术在高龄患者的应用[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志:电子版,2021,14(1):10‑14. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2021.01.003.
|
[16] |
ShiY, JinJ, QiuW, et al. Short‑term outcomes after robot-assisted vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy after the lear-ning curve[J]. JAMA Surg,2020,155(5):389‑394. DOI:10.10 01/jamasurg.2020.0021.
|
[17] |
吴鹏飞,张凯,陈建敏,等.胰十二指肠切除术治疗壶腹部周围疾病的临床疗效(附2 019例报告)[J].中华消化外科杂志,2022,21(4):483‑491. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20220321-00144.
|
[18] |
朱琳,杨小李,刘莉,等.加速康复外科在胰十二指肠切除术围手术期应用有效性和安全性的系统评价与Meta分析[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2022,38(6):1356-1363. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.06.026.
|
[19] |
杨威超,卜献民,周卫广,等.胰头十二指肠切除术后迟发性出血相关因素分析[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2017,20(4):272-275. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9905.2017.04.006.
|
[20] |
HuangXT, XieJZ, CaiJP, et al. Evaluation of the short‑term outcomes of robotic‑assisted radical resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity‑scored matching analysis[J]. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf),2023,11:goad018. DOI:10. 1093/gastro/goad018.
|
[21] |
KendrickML, van HilstJ, BoggiU, et al. Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy[J]. HPB (Oxford),2017,19(3):215-224. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.023.
|
[22] |
LiuQ, ZhaoZ, GaoY, et al. Novel single‑layer continuous suture of pancreaticojejunostomy for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci,2020,27(2):56‑63. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.682.
|
[23] |
LeiKY, XieWJ, FuSQ, et al. A comparison of the da Vinci Xi vs. da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy[J]. BMC Surg,2021,21(1):409. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01406-w.
|
[1] | Endoscopic Surgery Group, Digestive Endoscopy Branch, Chinese Medical Association, Endoscopic Surgery Expert Working Group, Chinese College of Surgeons, Professional Committee of Pancreatic Disease, Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Li Xun. Guideline for the management of complications of duodenal perforation associated with ERCP in China (2023 edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2024, 23(1): 1-9. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20231025-00166 |
[2] | Wu Yinshan, Guo Feng. Management strategies for bleeding complications of severe acute pancreatitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2023, 22(11): 1295-1299. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20231011-00141 |
[3] | Wu Aiwen 1, He Guoli 2. Prevention and treatment of complications of transanal total mesorectal excision[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2019, 18(8): 741-746. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2019.08.007 |
[4] | Liu Fenglin, Min Lingqiang, He Hongyong.. Prevention and treatment of recent complications after radical gastrectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2018, 17(6): 560-563. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2018.06.006 |
[5] | Liu Ziwen, Li Zongze, Du Yongxing. Development of laparoscopic hernia repair and prevention and treatment of complications[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2017, 16(9): 907-910. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2017.09.005 |
[6] | Liu Guiwei, Liu Yanhua, Jiang Guosheng, Ren Weidan.. Risk factors analysis of initial surgery and postoperative complications of Crohn′s disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2016, 15(12): 1150-1155. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2016.12.004 |
[7] | Zhou Chunhua, Ren Hua, Cai Wei, Xie Qi, Ju Tongfa, Jin Huicheng. Complications after procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in treating severe mucocutaneous hemorrhoids[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2014, 13(12): 964-966. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2014.12.012 |
[8] | LI Yong bin, WANG Xin, WANG Yi chao, YANG Zheng guo, WANG Ming jun, PENG Bing. Analysis of postoperative complications and risk factors in patients with portal hypertension treated by laparoscopic splenectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2013, 12(11): 841-845. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673 9752.2013.11.008 |
[9] | LIU Yin hua *, YAO Hong wei, . Complications following laparoscopic and open radical resection of colorectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2013, 12(6): 477-480. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2013.06.001 |
[10] | CHEN Zhen wei, HUANG Zi qi, DING Wei xing. Risk factors of complications after laparoscopic gastrectomy: a Logistic analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2012, 11(3): 248-251. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2012.03.015 |