• RCCSE中国核心学术期刊(A+)
  • 中国百强报刊
  • 百种中国杰出学术期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 中国高校百佳科技期刊
  • 中国自然科学类核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中华医学会优秀期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊顶尖学术论文(5000)项目来源期刊
  • 入选中国高质量科技期刊分级目录(消化病学)T1级
  • 入选《中国学术期刊影响因子年报(自然科学与工程技术)》Q1区
  • 入选《科技期刊世界影响力指数(WJCI)报告(2022)》
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊(A+)
  • 中国百强报刊
  • 百种中国杰出学术期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 中国高校百佳科技期刊
  • 中国自然科学类核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中华医学会优秀期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊顶尖学术论文(5000)项目来源期刊
  • 入选中国高质量科技期刊分级目录(消化病学)T1级
  • 入选《中国学术期刊影响因子年报(自然科学与工程技术)》Q1区
  • 入选《科技期刊世界影响力指数(WJCI)报告(2022)》
Chen Hao, Yu Peiwu, Huang Changming, et al. The 10-year outcome and prognostic factors of laparoscopic D2 radical distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a CLASS multicenter study[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2022, 21(3): 362-374. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20220221-00100
Citation: Chen Hao, Yu Peiwu, Huang Changming, et al. The 10-year outcome and prognostic factors of laparoscopic D2 radical distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a CLASS multicenter study[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2022, 21(3): 362-374. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20220221-00100

The 10-year outcome and prognostic factors of laparoscopic D2 radical distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a CLASS multicenter study

Funds: 

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointes-tinal Cancer 2020B121201004

Guangdong Provincial Major Talents Project 2019JC05Y361

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Li Guoxin, Email: gzliguoxin@163.com

  • Received Date: February 20, 2022
  • Available Online: July 04, 2024
  • Objective 

    To investigate the 10-year outcome and prognostic factors of laparo-scopic D2 radical distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer.

    Methods 

    The retrospec-tive cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 652 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who were admitted to 16 hospitals from the multicenter database of laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery in the Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS) Group, including 214 cases in the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, 191 cases in Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 52 cases in Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, 49 cases in West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 43 cases in Xijing Hospital of Air Force Medical University, 25 cases in Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, 14 cases in the First Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital, 12 cases in No.989 Hospital of PLA, 12 cases in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 10 cases in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 9 cases in the First People's Hospital of Foshan, 7 cases in Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, 7 cases in Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, 3 cases in Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, 2 cases in Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2 cases in Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, from February 2004 to December 2010 were collected. There were 442 males and 210 females, aged (57±12)years. All patients underwent laparoscopic D2 radical distal gastrectomy. Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations; (2) postoperative pathological examination; (3) postoperative recovery and complications; (4) follow-up; (5) prognostic factors analysis. Follow-up was conducted by outpatient examination and telephone interview to detect the tumor recurrence and metastasis, postoperative survival of patients up to March 2020. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD, and measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(Q1,Q3) or M(range). Count data were described as absolute numbers or percen-tages, and comparison between groups was conducted using the chi-square test. Comparison of ordinal data was analyzed using the rank sum test. The life table method was used to calculate survival rates and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw survival curves. Log-Rank test was used for survival analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were analyzed using the COX hazard regression model.

    Results 

    (1) Surgical situations: among 652 patients, 617 cases underwent D2 lymph node dissection and 35 cases underwent D2+ lymph node dissection. There were 348 cases with Billroth Ⅱ anastomosis, 218 cases with Billroth Ⅰ anastomosis, 25 cases with Roux-en-Y anastomosis and 61 cases with other digestive tract reconstruction methods. Twelve patients had combined visceral resection. There were 569 patients with intraoperative blood transfusion and 83 cases without blood transfusion. The operation time of 652 patients was 187(155,240)minutes and volume of intraoperative blood loss was 100(50,150)mL. (2) Postoperative pathological examina-tion: the maximum diameter of tumor was (4.5±2.0)cm of 652 patients. The number of lymph node dissected of 652 patients was 26(19,35), in which the number of lymph node dissected was >15 of 570 cases and ≤15 of 82 cases. The number of metastatic lymph node was 4(1,9). The proximal tumor margin was (4.8±1.6)cm and the distal tumor margin was (4.5±1.5)cm. Among 652 patients, 255 cases were classified as Borrmann type Ⅰ-Ⅱ, 334 cases were classified as Borrmann type Ⅲ-Ⅳ, and 63 cases had missing Borrmann classification data. The degree of tumor differentiation was high or medium in 171 cases, low or undifferentiated in 430 cases, and the tumor differentiation data was missing in 51 cases. There were 123, 253 and 276 cases in pathological stage T2, T3 and T4a, respectively. There were 116, 131, 214 and 191 cases in pathological stage N0, N1, N2 and N3, respectively. There were 260 and 392 cases in pathological TNM stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ, respectively. (3) Postoperative recovery and complications: the time to postoperative first out-of-bed activities, time to postoperative first flatus, time to the initial liquid food intake, duration of postoperative hospital stay of 652 patients were 3(2,4)days, 4(3,5)days, 5(4,6)days, 10(9,13)days, respectively. Among 652 patients, 69 cases had postoperative complications. Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ, grade Ⅲa, grade Ⅲb, and grade Ⅳa complications occurred in 60, 3, 5 and 1 cases, respectively (some patients could have multiple complications). The duodenal stump leakage was the most common surgical complication, with the incidence of 3.07%(20/652). Respiratory complication was the most common systemic complication, with the incidence of 2.91%(19/652). All the 69 patients were recovered and discharged successfully after treatment. (4) Follow-up: 652 patients were followed up for 110-193 months, with a median follow-up time of 124 months. There were 298 cases with postoperative recurrence and metastasis. Of the 255 patients with the time to postoperative recurrence and metastasis ≤5 years, there were 21 cases with distant metastasis, 69 cases with peritoneal metastasis, 37 cases with local recurrence, 52 cases with multiple recurrence and metastasis, 76 cases with recurrence and metastasis at other locations. The above indicators were 5, 9, 10, 4, 15 of the 43 patients with the time to postoperative recurrence and metastasis >5 years. There was no significant difference in the type of recurrence and metastasis between them (χ²=5.52, P>0.05). Cases in pathological TNM stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ were 62 and 193 of the patients with the time to postoperative recurrence and metastasis ≤5 years, versus 23 and 20 of the patients with the time to postoperative recurrence and metastasis >5 years, showing a significant difference in pathological TNM staging between them (χ²=15.36, P<0.05). Cases in pathological stage T2, T3, T4a were 42, 95, 118 of the patients with the time to postoperative recurrence and metastasis ≤5 years, versus 9, 21, 13 of the patients with the time to postoperative recurrence and metastasis >5 years, showing no significant difference in pathological T staging between them (Z=-1.80, P>0.05). Further analysis showed no significant difference in cases in pathological stage T2 or T3 (χ²=0.52, 2.08, P>0.05) but a significant difference in cases in pathological stage T4a between them (χ²=3.84, P<0.05). Cases in pathological stage N0, N1, N2, N3 were 19, 44, 85, 107 of the patients with the time to postoperative recurrence and metastasis ≤5 years, versus 12, 5, 18, 8 of the patients with the time to postoperative recurrence and metastasis >5 years, showing a significant difference in pathological N staging between them (Z=-3.34, P<0.05). Further analysis showed significant differences in cases in pathological stage N0 and N3 (χ²=16.52, 8.47, P<0.05) but no significant difference in cases in pathological stage N1 or N2 (χ²=0.85, 1.18, P>0.05). The median overall survival time was 81 months after surgery and 10-year overall survival rate was 46.1% of 652 patients. The 10-year overall survival rates of patients in TNM stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ were 59.6% and 37.5%, respectively, showing a significant difference between them (χ²=35.29, P<0.05). In further analysis, the 10-year overall survival rates of patients in pathological TNM stage ⅡA, ⅡB, ⅢA, ⅢB and ⅢC were 65.6%, 55.8%, 46.9%, 37.1% and 24.0%, respectively, showing a significant difference between them (χ²=55.06, P<0.05). The 10-year overall survival rates of patients in patholo-gical stage T2, T3 and T4a were 55.2%, 46.5% and 41.5%, respectively, showing a significant difference between them (χ²=8.39, P<0.05). The 10-year overall survival rates of patients in patholo-gical stage N0, N1, N2 and N3 were 63.7%, 56.2%, 48.5% and 26.4%, respectively, showing a signifi-cant difference between them (χ²=54.89, P<0.05). (5) Prognostic factors analysis: results of univariate analysis showed that age, maximum diameter of tumor, degree of tumor differentiation as low or undifferentiated, pathological TNM staging, pathological T staging, pathological stage N2 or N3, post-operative chemotherapy were related factors for the 10-year overall survival rate of locally advanced gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic D2 radical distal gastrectomy (hazard ratio=1.45, 1.64, 1.37, 2.05, 1.30, 1.68, 3.08, 0.56, 95% confidence interval as 1.15-1.84, 1.32-2.03, 1.05-1.77, 1.62-2.59, 1.05-1.61, 1.17-2.42, 2.15-4.41, 0.44-0.70, P<0.05). Results of multivariate analysis showed that maximum diameter of tumor >4 cm, low-differentiated or undifferentiated tumor, pathological TNM stage Ⅲ were independent risk factors for the 10-year overall survival rate of locally advanced gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic D2 radical distal gastrectomy (hazard ratio=1.48,1.44, 1.81, 95% confidence interval as 1.19-1.84, 1.11-1.88, 1.42-2.30, P<0.05) and postoperative chemotherapy was a independent protective factor for the 10-year overall survi-val rate of locally advanced gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic D2 radical distal gastrec-tomy (hazard ratio=0.57, 95% confidence interval as 045-0.73, P<0.05).

    Conclusions 

    Laparoscopic assisted D2 radical distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer has satisfactory 10-year oncologic outcomes. A high proportion of patients in pathological TNM stage Ⅲ, pathological stage T4a, pathological stage N3 have the time to postoperative recurrence and metastasis ≤5 years, whereas a high proportion of patients in pathological TNM stage Ⅱ or pathological stage N0 have the time to postoperative recurrence and metastasis >5 years. Maximum diameter of tumor >4 cm, low-differentiated or undifferentiated tumor, pathological TNM stage Ⅲ are independent risk factors for the 10-year overall survival rate of locally advanced gastric cancer patients undergoing laparos-copic D2 radical distal gastrectomy. Postoperative chemotherapy is a independent protective factor for the 10-year overall survival rate of locally advanced gastric cancer patients undergoing laparos-copic D2 radical distal gastrectomy.

  • [1]
    SungH, FerlayJ, SiegelRL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2021,71(3):209‑249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660.
    [2]
    CaoW, ChenHD, YuYW, et al. Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020[J]. Chin Med J (Engl),2021,134(7):783‑791. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001474.
    [3]
    KitanoS, IsoY, MoriyamaM, et al. Laparoscopy‑assisted Billroth Ⅰ gastrectomy[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc,1994,4(2):146‑148.
    [4]
    KimHH, HyungWJ, ChoGS, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report-a phase Ⅲ multicenter, prospective, randomized trial (KLASS Trial)[J]. Ann Surg,2010,251(3):417‑420. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc8f6b.
    [5]
    KimW, KimHH, HanSU, et al. Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage Ⅰ gastric cancer: short‑term out-comes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS‑01)[J]. Ann Surg,2016,263(1):28-35. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001346.
    [6]
    KataiH, SasakoM, FukudaH, et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy‑assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancrea-tic nodal dissection for clinical stage Ⅰ gastric cancer: a multicenter phase Ⅱ trial (JCOG 0703)[J]. Gastric Cancer,2010,13(4):238‑244. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-010-0565-0.
    [7]
    HondaM, HikiN, KinoshitaT, et al. Long‑term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for clinical stage Ⅰ gastric cancer: the LOC‑1 study[J]. Ann Surg,2016,264(2):214‑222. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001654.
    [8]
    KimHH, HanSU, KimMC, et al. Effect of laparoscopic dis-tal gastrectomy vs open distal gastrectomy on long‑term survival among patients with stage Ⅰ gastric cancer: the KLASS‑01 randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Oncol,2019,5(4):506‑513. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6727.
    [9]
    KataiH, MizusawaJ, KatayamaH, et al. Survival outcomes after laparoscopy‑assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage ⅠA or ⅠB gastric cancer (JCOG0912): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol,2020,5(2):142‑151. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30332-2.
    [10]
    Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver.4)[J]. Gastric Cancer,2017,20(1):1‑19. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4.
    [11]
    LiG, HuY, LiuH. Current status of randomized controlled trials for laparoscopic gastric surgery for gastric cancer in China[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg,2015,8(3):263‑267. DOI:10. 1111/ases.12198.
    [12]
    胡彦锋,余江,张策,等.胃癌外科临床数据挖掘系统的构建与实现[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2010,13(7):510‑515. DOI:10. 3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2010.07.012.
    [13]
    HuY, HuangC, SunY, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advan-ced gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Clin Oncol,2016,34(12):1350‑1357. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2015.63. 7215.
    [14]
    YuJ, HuangC, SunY, et al. Effect of laparoscopic vs open distal gastrectomy on 3‑year disease‑free survival in pati-ents with locally advanced gastric cancer: the CLASS‑01 randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA,2019,321(20):1983-1992. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.5359.
    [15]
    HuangC, LiuH, HuY, et al. Laparoscopic vs open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: five‑year outcomes from the CLASS‑01 randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Surg,2022,157(1):9‑17. DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2021. 5104.
    [16]
    NCCNClinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Gastric Cancer Version2. 2021)[DB/OL]. National Comprehensive Cancer Network,Inc.,2021[2022-02-21]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/gastric.pdf.
    [17]
    HartgrinkHH, van de VeldeCJ, PutterH, et al. Extended lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: who may benefit? Final results of the randomized Dutch gastric cancer group trial[J]. J Clin Oncol,2004,22(11):2069-2077. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.026.
    [18]
    SongunI, PutterH, KranenbargEM, et al. Surgical treat-ment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol,2010,11(5):439-449. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70070-X.
    [19]
    HyungWJ, YangHK, ParkYK, et al. Long‑term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: the KLASS‑02‑RCT randomized clinical trial[J]. J Clin Oncol,2020,38(28):3304‑3313. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.01210.
    [20]
    李国新,张策,余江.腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌D2根治术:基于解剖的艺术[J].外科理论与实践,2007,12(6):533‑538. DOI:10. 3969/j.issn.1007-9610.2007.06.007.
    [21]
    李国新.腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌D2根治术[J/CD].消化肿瘤杂志:电子版,2010,2(4):249‑254.
    [22]
    LiGX, ZhangC, YuJ, et al. A new order of D2 lymphadenec-tomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer: live anatomy-based dissection[J]. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol,2010,19(6):355‑363. DOI: 10.3109/13645706.2010.527775.
    [23]
    SasakiT. In regard to gastric cancer treatment guidelines-a revised edition[J]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho,2004,31(12):1947-1951.
    [24]
    Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric can-cer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3)[J]. Gastric Cancer,2011,14(2):113-123. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-011-0042-4.
    [25]
    DindoD, DemartinesN, ClavienPA. Classification of surgi-cal complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey[J]. Ann Surg,2004,240(2):205‑213. DOI:10.1097/01.sla.0000133 083.54934.ae.
    [26]
    WashingtonK. 7th editionof the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach[J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2010,17(12):3077-3079. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1362-z.
    [27]
    ObaK, PaolettiX, AlbertsS, et al. Disease‑free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in adjuvant trials of gastric cancer: a meta‑analysis[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst,2013,105(21):1600‑1607. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djt270.
    [28]
    王玮,孙哲,邓靖宇,等.基于多中心大样本数据库的胃癌外科治疗相关数据的整合与分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2016,19(2):179‑185. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274. 2016.02.014.
    [29]
    LinJX, LinJP, LiP, et al. Which staging system better predicts 10‑year survival for gastric cancer? A study using an international multicenter database[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol,2018,44(8):1205‑1211. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.05.014.
    [30]
    WangJ, SunY, BertagnolliMM. Comparison of gastric cancer survival between Caucasian and Asian patients treated in the United States: results from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database[J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2015,22(9):2965-2971. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4388-4.
    [31]
    WohnrathDR, AraujoR. D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer as an independent prognostic factor of 10‑year overall survival[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol,2019,45(3):446‑453. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.10.538.
    [32]
    LongD, FengQ, LiZS, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gas-trectomy for serosa‑invasive gastric cancer: a single-cen-ter retrospective cohort study[J]. Surgery,2021,169(6):1486-1492. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.11.032.
    [33]
    LiZ, LiuY, HaoY, et al. Surgical and long‑term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for serosa-positive (pT4a) gastric cancer: A propensity score-match-ed analysis[J]. Surg Oncol,2019,28:167‑173. DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.01.003.
    [34]
    ParkCH, SongKY, KimSN. Treatment results for gastric cancer surgery: 12 years′ experience at a single institute in Korea[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol,2008,34(1):36‑41. DOI:10.10 16/j.ejso.2007.03.004.
    [35]
    BrundellSM, TuckerK, TexlerM, et al. Variables in the spread of tumor cells to trocars and port sites during operative laparoscopy[J]. Surg Endosc,2002,16(10):1413-1419. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-9112-8.
    [36]
    WangSJ, EmeryR, FullerCD, et al. Conditional survival in gastric cancer: a SEER database analysis[J]. Gastric Cancer,2007,10(3):153-158. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-007-0424-9.
    [37]
    LeeJW, AliB, YooHM, et al. Conditional survival analysis in Korean patients with gastric cancer undergoing cura-tive gastrectomy[J]. BMC Cancer,2015,15:1005. DOI:10.11 86/s12885-015-2022-2.
    [38]
    WangP, SunZ, WangW, et al. Conditional survival of pati-ents with gastric cancer who undergo curative resection: a multi‑institutional analysis in China[J]. Cancer,2018,124(5):916‑924. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31160.
    [39]
    KimY, EjazA, SpolveratoG, et al. Conditional survival after surgical resection of gastric cancer: a multi-institutional analysis of the us gastric cancer collaborative[J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2015,22(2):557‑564. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4116-5.
    [40]
    李国新,余江,胡彦锋,等.南方医院腹腔镜胃肠外科教学培训十年[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2017,20(11):1217‑1221. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2017.11.002.
    [41]
    余江,李国新.立足解剖注重团队面向需求——10年腔镜培训体会与反馈[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2013,16(10):922-924. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2013.010.004.
    [42]
    YuJ, HuJ, HuangC, et al. The impact of age and comor-bidity on postoperative complications in patients with ad-vanced gastric cancer after laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy: results from the Chinese laparoscropic gastrointestinal surgery study (CLASS) group[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol,2013,39(10):1144-1149. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.06.021.
    [43]
    HuY, YingM, HuangC, et al. Oncologic outcomes of lapa-roscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a large-scale multicenter retrospective cohort study from China[J]. Surg Endosc,2014,28(7):2048-2056. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3426-9.
    [44]
    中国腹腔镜胃肠外科研究组(CLASS),中国抗癌协会胃癌专业委员会,中华医学会外科分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组.腹腔镜局部进展期远端胃癌D2根治术标准操作流程:CLASS-01研究共识[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2019,22(9):807‑811. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.09.002.
    [45]
    李国新.腔镜为笔著经典 微创做书写春秋[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2021,24(8):657-661. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn.4415 30-20210728-00301.

Catalog

    Article views (1460) PDF downloads (0) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return