• RCCSE中国核心学术期刊(A+)
  • 中国百强报刊
  • 百种中国杰出学术期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 中国高校百佳科技期刊
  • 中国自然科学类核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中华医学会优秀期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊顶尖学术论文(5000)项目来源期刊
  • 入选中国高质量科技期刊分级目录(消化病学)T1级
  • 入选《中国学术期刊影响因子年报(自然科学与工程技术)》Q1区
  • 入选《科技期刊世界影响力指数(WJCI)报告(2022)》
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊(A+)
  • 中国百强报刊
  • 百种中国杰出学术期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 中国高校百佳科技期刊
  • 中国自然科学类核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中华医学会优秀期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊顶尖学术论文(5000)项目来源期刊
  • 入选中国高质量科技期刊分级目录(消化病学)T1级
  • 入选《中国学术期刊影响因子年报(自然科学与工程技术)》Q1区
  • 入选《科技期刊世界影响力指数(WJCI)报告(2022)》
Luo Yang, Yu Minhao, Chen Jianjun, et al. Application value of barbed suture in reinforcing anastomosis during laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2020, 19(11): 1205-1210. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20201020-00664
Citation: Luo Yang, Yu Minhao, Chen Jianjun, et al. Application value of barbed suture in reinforcing anastomosis during laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2020, 19(11): 1205-1210. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20201020-00664

Application value of barbed suture in reinforcing anastomosis during laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer

More Information
  • Objective:To investigate the application value of barbed suture in reinforcing anastomosis during laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer.
    Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 215 patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical resection in the Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine from March 2016 to December 2018 were collected. There were 122 males and 93 females, aged (62.3±0.7)years, with a range from 20 to 75 years. Of 215 patients, 86 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer with barbed suture for anastomosis were allocated into barbed suture group, and 129 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer without reinforced anastomosis were allocated into traditional group, respectively. Observation indicators: (1) intraoperative situations; (2) postoperative situations; (3) follow-up. Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect postoperative complications, anastomotic healing and patency of patients up to May 2019. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range). Count data were described as absolute numbers or percentages, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi-square test. Ordinal data were analyzed using the Friedman non-parametric test.
    Results: (1) Intraoperative situations: patients in the two groups underwent laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer successfully, without conversion to open laparotomy. The volume of intraoperative blood loss, operation time, distance between the anastomosis and dentate line, length of auxiliary incision of the barbed suture group were (127±9)mL, (160.2±3.8)minutes, (3.56±0.15)cm, (4.12±0.11)cm,respectively, versus (114± 6)mL, (128.9±2.4)minutes, (3.67±0.12)cm, (4.25±0.09)cm of the traditional group. There was a significant difference in the operation time between the two groups (t=7.33, P<0.05), but no significant difference in the other indicators between the two groups (t=1.32, 0.61, 0.94, P>0.05). (2) Postoperative situations: the time to first flatus after surgery and duration of postoperative hospital stay of the barbed suture group were (72.5± 2.2)hours and (8.1±0.5)days, respectively, versus (76.2±1.7)hours and (8.0±0.5)days of the traditional group, showing no significant difference between the two groups (t=1.33, 0.87, P>0.05). (3) Follow-up: 215 patients were followed up for 6-12 months, with a median follow-up time of 8 months. In the barbed suture group, 2 patients had postoperative anastomotic leakage, 5 had urinary retention, 6 had incision infection, 4 had intestinal obstruction, 3 had bowel dysfunction in 6 months after operation. In the traditional group, 13 patients had postoperative anastomotic leakage, 15 had urinary retention, 11 had incision infection, 8 had intestinal obstruction, 9 had bowel dysfunction in 6 months after operation. There was a significant difference in the anastomotic leakage between the two groups (t=4.77, P<0.05), but no significant difference in the urinary retention, incision infection, intestinal obstruction, bowel dysfunction in 6 months after operation between the two groups (t=2.07, 0.17, 0.22, 1.26, P>0.05). Patients in the two groups showed unobstructed intestinal tract on enteroscopy.
    Conclusion:The barbed suture for reinforcing anastomosis in radical resection of rectal cancer is safe and feasible, which can reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage.

  • Related Articles

    [1]Xu Lai, Sun Xiyu, Xiao Yi, Lin Guole, Qiu Huizhong, Zhang Yuelun, Zhou Jiaolin, Lu Junyang, Niu Beizhan, Zhang Guannan, Wu Bin. Incidence and influencing factors of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2023, 22(6): 742-747. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20230417-00171
    [2]Ying Jun, Sun Yahuang, Wang Anqi, Bian Ce, Chen Guoliang, Tao Yu, Chen Junnan, Lu Hao, You Qing, Zhang Yu, Zhou Haiyang, Wang Zhiguo, Ruan Canping. Influencing factors of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intersphincter resection for extremely low rectal cancer and construction of nomogram prediction model[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2023, 22(4): 526-531. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20230313-00105
    [3]Luo Yang, Yu Minhao, Jing Ran, Zhou Hong, Yuan Danping, Cui Rong, Li Yong, Zhang Xueli, Feng Shichun, Lu Shaobo, Wang Rongguo, Lu Chunlei, Tang Shaojun, Tang Liming, Zhang Yinxin, Zhong Ming. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic lower anterior resection of rectal cancer and application value of risk assessment scoring model: a multicenter retrospective study[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2021, 20(12): 1342-1350. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20211020-00514
    [4]Ma Xinli, Xu Jia, Gu Jiayi, Yang Linxi, Zhao Enhao, Cheng Gong, Cao Hui, Qiu Jiangfeng. Application value of hand-sewn esophagojejunal anastomosis in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2020, 19(6): 680-685. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20200514-00350
    [5]Sun Yueming, Feng Yifei, Tang Junwei, Xu Ziwei, Huang Yuanjian, Zhang Dongsheng. Clinical effects of laparoscopic left colic artery-preserving total mesorectal excison for middle-low rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2019, 18(5): 478-483. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2019.05.014
    [6]Jiang Caiyun, Chi Pan, Lin Huiming, Lu Xinrong, Huang Ying, Xu Zongbin, Huang Shenghui, Sun Yanwu, Ye Daoxiong.. Influencing factors and prognostic analysis of anastomotic leakage after anus preserving operation in 931 patients with rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2016, 15(8): 795-801. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2016.08.008
    [7]Chi Pan, Chen Zhifen. Updates in the diagnosis and treatment of anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2014, 13(7): 584-590. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2014.07.023
    [8]Zou Kejian, Zhou Weiping, Li Renfeng, Cai Guohao. Risk factors of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer: a Meta analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2014, 13(7): 539-544. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2014.07.010
    [9]Dai Zhihui, Du Jinlin, Wang Jianping, Jin Xihan. Effects of protective transverse colostomy on the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage and stricture after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2014, 13(7): 535-538. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2014.07.009
    [10]LI Jian jun, LU Bang yu, HUANG Yu bin. Application of wrapping pancreatic duct jejunum anastomosis in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2013, 12(2): 116-119. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2013.02.007

Catalog

    Article views (6327) PDF downloads (0) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return