术前NLR-PLR评分与结直肠癌临床病理特征及预后关系的研究

Association of preoperative NLR-PLR score with clinicopathological parameters and prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨术前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)联合血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)(NLR-PLR)评分与结直肠癌临床病理特征及预后的关系。
    方法:采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2013年1月至2014年12月中国医科大学附属第一医院收治的178例结直肠癌患者的临床病理资料;男101例,女77例;平均年龄为63岁,年龄范围为21~90岁。患者均行结直肠癌根治术。观察指标:(1)NLR和PLR临界值及其相关性。(2)术前NLR-PLR评分与结直肠癌患者临床病理特征的关系。(3)随访和生存情况。(4)影响结直肠癌患者预后的危险因素分析。采用门诊或电话方式进行随访,每3个月进行定期随访。随访内容包括肿瘤标志物、X线计算机体层摄影术检查、肠镜检查,了解患者术后生存情况。随访时间截至2017年6月。总体生存时间定义为自手术日期至末次有效随访日期或患者死亡日期。偏态分布的计量资料以M(范围)表示。计数资料以绝对数表示,组间比较采用x2检验。等级资料比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,采用Log-rank检验进行生存分析。采用COX比例风险模型进行单因素和多因素分析。
    结果:(1)NLR和PLR临界值及其相关性。NLR、PLR的受试者工作特征结果显示:NLR临界值为2.7[曲线下面积(AUC)=0.739,95%可信区间为0.638~0.841,P<0.05],PLR临界值为246(AUC=0.640,95%可信区间为0.521~0.758,P<0.05)。NLR与PLR具有相关性(r=0.712,P<0.05)。(2)术前NLR-PLR评分与结直肠癌患者临床病理特征的关系。术前NLR-PLR评分结果显示:NLR-PLR评分0分、1分、2分患者分别为99例、52例、27例。术前NLR-PLR不同评分患者中,肿瘤直径、肿瘤浸润程度、TNM分期、Dukes分期及远处转移比较,差异均有统计学意义(x2=11.294,10.816,9.802,9.525,8.759,P<0.05)。(3)随访和生存情况:178例患者均获得随访。随访时间为1~53个月,中位随访时间为37个月。178例患者平均生存时间为37个月,其中99例NLR-PLR评分为0分患者平均生存时间为50个月,52例NLR-PLR评分为1分患者平均生存时间为44个月,27例NLR-PLR评分为2分患者平均生存时间为35个月。NLR-PLR评分为0分患者生存时间与NLR-PLR评分为1分、2分患者生存时间比较,差异均有统计学意义(x2=6.388,26.388,P<0.05)。NLR-PLR评分为1分患者生存时间与NLR-PLR评分为2分患者生存时间比较,差异有统计学意义(x2=5.350,P<0.05)。(4)影响结直肠癌患者预后的危险因素分析。单因素分析结果显示:肿瘤浸润程度、TNM分期、Dukes分期、远处转移、NLR-PLR评分、血小板-NLR评分是影响结直肠癌患者预后的相关因素(风险比=2.439,2.472,2.221,9.020,2.671,2.099,95%可信区间为1.443~4.124,1.413~4.323,1.282~3.849,4.449~18.082,1.742~4.097,1.339~3.290,P<0.05)。多因素分析结果显示:肿瘤浸润程度、远处转移和NLR-PLR评分是影响结直肠癌患者预后的独立因素(风险比=2.045,5.641,2.271,95%可信区间为1.051~3.979,2.590~12.288,1.185~4.354,P<0.05)。
    结论:术前NLR-PLR评分与结直肠癌患者的肿瘤直径、肿瘤浸润程度、TNM分期、Dukes分期和远处转移相关,评分越高的患者肿瘤直径越大、肿瘤浸润程度越高、肿瘤分期越高、越容易远处转移。术前NLR-PLR评分可有效评估结直肠癌患者的预后。NLR-PLR评分越高的患者平均生存时间越短。术前NLR-PLR评分是影响结直肠癌患者预后的独立因素。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To investigate the association of preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio combined with platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR-PLR) score with clinicopathological parameters and prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer.
    Methods:
    The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 178 patients with colorectal cancer who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University from January 2013 to December 2014 were collected. There were 101 males and 77 females, aged from 21 to 90 years, with an average age of 63 years. All patients underwent radical resection of colorectal cancer. Observation indicators: (1) cutoffs of NLR and PLR and correlation between them; (2) association between preoperative NLR-PLR score and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with colorectal cancer; (3) follow-up and survival; (4) analysis of the risk factors for prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer. Follow-up was performed once every 3 months using outpatient examination or telephone interview including tumor markers, computed tomography and enteroscopy to detect postoperative survival of patients up to June 2017. Overall survival time was defined as the date of surgery to the date of the last valid follow-up or the date of death. Measurement data with skewed distribution were expressed as M (range). Count data were expressed as absolute numbers, and comparison between groups was performed using the chi-square test. Comparison of ordinal data was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw survival curve, and Log-rank test was used for survival analysis. The COX proportional hazard model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses.
    Results: (1) Cutoffs of NLR and PLR and correlation between them. Receiver working characteristics of NLR and PLR showed that the NLR had a cutoff of 2.7 [area under curve (AUC)=0.739, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.638-0.841, P<0.05] and PLR had a cutoff of 246 (AUC=0.640, 95%CI: 0.521-0.758, P<0.05). There was a correlation between NLR and PLR (r=0.712, P<0.05). (2) Association between preoperative NLR-PLR score and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with colorectal cancer. Results of preoperative NLR-PLR score showed that the NLR-PLR score was 0, 1, and 2 in 99, 52, and 27 patients, respectively. There were significant differences in tumor diameter, degree of tumor invasion, TNM staging, Dukes staging, and distant metastasis between patients with different preoperative NLR-PLR scores (x2=11.294, 10.816, 9.802, 9.525, 8.759, P<0.05). (3) Follow-up and survival: 178 patients were followed up for 1-53 months, with a median follow-up time of 37 months. The average survival time was 37 months for all the 178 patients, 50 months for 99 patients with NLR-PLR score of 0, 44 months for 52 patients with NLR-PLR score of 1, and 35 months for 27 patients with NLR-PLR score of 2. There was a significant difference in survival time between patients with NLR-PLR score of 0 and patients with NLR-PLR score of 1 (x2=6.388, P<0.05), between patients with NLR-PLR score of 0 and patients with NLR-PLR score of 2 (x2=26.388, P<0.05), between patients with NLR-PLR score of 1 and patients with NLR-PLR score of 2 (x2=5.350, P<0.05). (4) Analysis of the risk factors for prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer. Results of univariate analysis showed that degree of tumor invasion, TNM staging, Dukes staging, distant metastasis, NLR-PLR score, and platelet-NLR score were related factors for prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer [hazard ratio (HR)=2.439, 2.472, 2.221, 9.020, 2.671, 2.099, 95%CI: 1.443-4.124, 1.413-4.323, 1.282-3.849, 4.449-18.082, 1.742-4.097, 1.339-3.290, P<0.05]. Results of multivariate analysis showed that degree of tumor invasion, distant metastasis, and NLR-PLR score were independent factors for prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (HR=2.045, 5.641, 2.271, 95%CI: 1.051-3.979, 2.590-12.288, 1.185-4.354, P<0.05).
    Conclusions:The preoperative NLR-PLR score is associated with tumor diameter, degree of tumor invasion, TNM staging, Dukes staging, and distant metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer. Patients with higher score have larger tumor diameter, higher degree of tumor invasion, higher stage, and easier distant metastasis. Preoperative NLR-PLR score can effectively evaluate the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer. Patients with higher NLR-PLR score have shorter survival time. The NLR-PLR score is an independent influencing factor for prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer.

     

/

返回文章
返回