新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间急腹症患者急诊手术策略

Emergency surgical strategies for patients with acute abdomen during the COVID-19 outbreak

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨新型冠状病毒肺炎(以下简称新冠肺炎)疫情期间急腹症患者急诊手术策略。
    方法:采用回顾性描述性研究方法。收集2020年1月18日至2月10日华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院收治的20例急腹症患者的临床资料;男13例,女7例;平均年龄为57岁,年龄范围为25~82岁。所有急诊手术患者术前行肺部CT检查,必要时完善咽拭子核酸检测。患者排除新冠肺炎后按常规选择麻醉方式;疑似和确诊新冠肺炎患者,可根据患者病情、手术方式选择麻醉方式。患者排除新冠肺炎后,按常规程序行急诊手术。疑似或确诊新冠肺炎患者,采用三级防护进行急诊手术。观察指标:(1)手术情况。(2)术后情况。正态分布的计量资料以均数(范围)表示。计数资料以绝对数表示。
    结果:(1)手术情况:20例急腹症患者中,16例术前排除新冠肺炎,4例无法排除新冠肺炎。20例急腹症患者均顺利完成急诊腹部手术,其中硬膜外麻醉手术2例(开腹阑尾切除术1例、开腹十二指肠球部穿孔修补术1例),全身麻醉手术18例(腹腔镜胃十二指肠穿孔修补术9例、开腹小肠部分切除术3例、腹腔镜阑尾切除术3例、腹腔镜左半结肠切除术1例、腹腔镜右半结肠切除术1例、胆囊造瘘术1例)。患者手术时间为32~194 min,平均手术时间为85 mim;术中出血量为50~400 mL,平均术中出血量为68 mL。(2)术后情况:16例术前排除新冠肺炎患者术后于普通单间病房治疗,其中1例术后5 d出现发热,急诊复查肺部CT显示双肺多发磨玻璃样改变,高度疑似新冠肺炎,及时转至隔离病房治疗,同时完善咽拭子核酸检测,结果显示双阳性;追问患者病史,患者及家属均为武汉居民,疫情期间未居家隔离,无法确认是否有新冠肺炎患者接触史;参与该例患者治疗的医护人员在14 d医学观察期内未出现新冠肺炎相关症状。其余15例患者术后恢复顺利。4例术前结合病史及肺部CT检查结果不排除新冠肺炎患者,术后直接转入隔离病房治疗,术后连续2次咽拭子核酸检测均为阴性,排除新冠肺炎,患者原发病术后恢复顺利。20例急腹症患者术后发生并发症2例,其中手术切口感染1例,敞开伤口消毒换药后行二次缝合,愈合良好;肠液漏1例,经腹腔引流管引流,保守治疗后好转。20例急腹症患者中,无死亡病例。
    结论:对外科急腹症患者采用急诊关口前移的方式进行筛查。排除新冠肺炎的患者,按常规程序行急诊手术;对于不能排除新冠肺炎患者,采用三级防护行急诊手术。术后密切监测患者的体温、血常规等实验室检查,必要时复查肺部CT及咽拭子核酸检测。术前排除新冠肺炎患者术后于单间病房治疗;术后确诊新冠肺炎须及时转至隔离病房治疗;术前结合病史不排除新冠肺炎患者,术后直接转入隔离病房治疗。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To investigate the emergency surgical strategies for patients with acute abdomen during the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak.
    Methods:The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinical data of 20 patients with acute abdomen who were admitted to the Union Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology between January 18, 2020 and February 10, 2020 were collected. There were 13 males and 7 females, aged from 25 to 82 years, with an average age of 57 years. All the patients with emergency surgeries received pulmonary computed tomography (CT) examination before surgery, and completed nucleic acid detection in throat swab if necessary. Patients excluded from COVID-19 underwent regular anesthesia, suspected and confirmed cases were selected a proper anesthesia based on their medical condition and surgical procedure. Patients excluded from COVID-19 underwent emergency surgeries following the regular procedure, suspected and confirmed cases underwent emergency surgeries following the three-grade protection.Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations; (2) postoperative situations. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as average (range). Count data were described as absolute numbers.
    Results:(1) Surgical situations: of the 20 patients with acute abdomen, 16 patients were excluded from COVID-19, and 4 were not excluded. All the 20 patients underwent emergency abdominal surgeries successfully, of whom 2 received surgeries under epidural anesthesia (including 1 with open appendectomy, 1 with open repair of duodenal bulbar perforation), 18 received surgeries under general anesthesia (including 9 with laparoscopic repair of duodenal bulbar perforation, 3 with open partial enterectomy, 3 with laparoscopic appendectomy, 1 with laparoscopic left hemicolectomy, 1 with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, 1 with cholecystostomy). The operation time of patients was 32-194 minutes, with an average time of 85 minutes. The volume of intraoperative blood loss was 50-400 mL, with an average volume of 68 mL. (2) Postoperative situations: 16 patients excluded from COVID-19 preopratively were treated in the private general ward postoperatively. One of the 16 patients had fever at the postoperative 5th day and was highly suspected of COVID-19 after an emergency follow-up of pulmonary CT showing multiple ground-glass changes in the lungs. The patient was promptly transferred to the isolation ward for treatment, and results of nucleic acid detection in throat swab showed double positive. Medical history described by the patient showed that the patient and family members were residents of Wuhan who were not isolated at home during the epidemic. There was no way to confirm whether they had a history of exposure to patients with COVID-19. Medical staffs involved in this case did not show COVID-19 related symptoms during 14 days of medical observation. The other 15 patients recovered well postoperatively. The 4 patients who were not excluded from COVID-19 preoperatively based on medical history and results of pulmonary CT examination were directly transferred to the isolation ward for treatment postoperatively. They were excluded from COVID-19 for two consecutive negative results of nucleic acid detection in the throat swab and recovered well. Two of the 20 patients with acute abdomen had postoperative complications. One had surgical incision infection and recovered after secondary closure following opening incision, sterilizing and dressing, the other one had intestinal leakage and was improved after conservative treatment by abdominal drainage. There was no death in the 20 patients with acute abdomen.
    Conclusions:Patients with acute abdomen need to be screened through emergency forward. Patients excluded from COVID-19 undergo emergency surgeries following the regular procedure, and patients not excluded from COVID-19 undergo emergency surgeries following the three-grade protection. The temperature, blood routine test and other laboratory examinations are performed to monitor patients after operation, and the pulmonary CT and throat nucleic acid tests should be conducted if necessary. Patients excluded from COVID-19 preopratively are treated in the private general ward postoperatively, and they should be promptly transferred to the isolation ward for treatment after being confirmed. Patients who are not excluded from COVID-19 preoperatively based on medical history should be directly transferred to the isolation ward for treatment postoperatively.

     

/

返回文章
返回