术中多影像融合介入导航系统在复杂肝胆管结石病诊断与治疗中的应用价值

Application value of real-time virtual sonography in diagnosis and treatment of complicated hepatolithiasis

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨术中多影像融合介入导航系统(RVS)在复杂肝胆管结石病诊断与治疗中的应用价值。
    方法:采用回顾性描述性研究方法。收集2017年10月至2018年3月湖南省人民医院收治的10例复杂肝胆管结石病患者的临床资料;男3例,女7例;平均年龄为57岁,年龄范围为40~69岁。患者术前均行腹部(肝胆胰脾)彩色多普勒超声、磁共振胰胆管成像及上腹部薄层螺旋CT平扫+增强检查。CT检查数据导入RVS。采用RVS定位结石、结石与大血管关系、胆管以及肝门部血管解剖结构,手术采用RVS引导下行包括肝门部胆管切开术、狭窄胆管切开整形术、肝胆管盆式内引流术、肝叶(段)切除术、肝实质切开取石术等多种组合手术方式。观察指标:(1)手术及术后情况。(2)典型病例分析。(3)随访情况。采用门诊方式进行术后随访,了解患者结石残留情况。随访时间截至2019年6月。偏态分布的计量资料以 M(范围)表示。计数资料以绝对数表示。
    结果:(1)手术及术后情况:10例患者均成功在RVS引导下行复杂肝胆管结石病手术,RVS配对均获成功(CT检查影像与超声影像差距<2 mm)。术中均通过胆道镜证实取净结石,无残留。10例患者手术时间为285 min(210~360 min),术中出血量为200 mL (100~ 600 mL),无输血患者,住院时间为20.5 d(14.0~29.0 d),无围术期死亡。1例患者术后并发胆汁漏和腹腔感染,经保守治疗后痊愈。(2)典型病例分析:病例10,女,60岁,术前影像学检查提示复杂肝胆管结石病,拟行肝实质切开取石+肝方叶切除肝门胆管整形+盆式内引流术。将患者术前CT检查图像与术中彩色多普勒超声图像进行融合配对,配对层面为门静脉矢状部横切面和门静脉右支横切面,并在图像上标记结石以及重要管道。准确定位后采用刮匙进行取石。在肝脏表面结石感明显处切开肝实质及末梢扩张胆管取石,取出结石后经该肝内胆管与肝门部胆管汇合。胆管切开的左侧终点采用实时超声检查确认。超声检查确定门静脉位置,避开血管行内整形术解除狭窄。(3)随访情况:10例患者均获得术后随访,随访时间为6~ 12个月,中位随访时间为8个月。10例患者中,1例术后2个月造影检查怀疑肝右前叶末梢结石,无法通过胆道镜取出,拔除T管后未见症状复发,9例均未见结石残留。
    结论:RVS应用于复杂肝胆管结石病手术中,有助于术中精准诊断,从而使手术治疗安全有效。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To investigate the application value of realtime virtual sonography(RVS)in the diagnosis and treatment of complicated hepatolithiasis.
    Methods:The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinical data of 10 patients with complicated hepatolithiasis who were admitted to Hunan Provincial People′s Hospital between October 2017 and March 2018 were collected. There were 3 males and 7 females, aged from 40 to 69 years, with an average age of 57 years. Patients received abdominal color Doppler ultrasound examination, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and upper abdominal spiral computed tomography (CT) thinly scanning +enhanced examination. Data of CT examination were imported into RVS. RVS was used to locate hepatolithiasis, relationship between stones and vessels, anatomy of bile ducts and vessels in hepatic hilus. Surgical methods included RVSguided hilar cholangiotomy, biliary stricturoplasty, bilateral hepatojejunostomy, hepatic segmentectomy (lobectomy), and hepatolithotomy. Observation indicators: (1) surgical and postoperative situations; (2) typical case analysis; (3) Follow-up. Follow-up using outpatient examination was performed to detect residual stones up to June 2019. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(range). Count data were described as absolute numbers.
    Results:(1) Surgical and postoperative situations: 10 patients underwent RVSguided surgeries successfully for complicated hepatolithiasis, with successful match in RVS (difference between CT images and ultrosound images <2 mm). No residual stone was identified by choledochoscope during operation. The operation time and volume of intraoperative blood loss were 285 minutes (range, 210-360 minutes) and 200 mL (range, 100-600 mL), respectively. No blood transfusion was needed during the operations. The duration of hospital stay was 20.5 days (range,14.0-29.0 days). There was no perioperative death. One patient had postoperative biliary leakage and abdominal infection, and was cured after conservative treatment. (2) Typical case analysis: the tenth patient, female, 60 years old, was diagnosed with complicated hepatolithiasis, and was prepared to undergo hepatolithotomy+quadrate lobectomy and hilar cholangioplasty+bilateral hepatojejunostomy. Preoperative CT images and intraoperative color Doppler ultrasound images of the patient were fused and matched on the sagittal section of the portal vein and the cross section of the right branch of portal vein, and stones and important vessels were marked on the images. After accurate positioning, a curette was used to remove the stones. Removal of biliary stones through hepatic parenchyma and peripheral dilated bile ducts was conducted at the site where stones obviously existed. After the stones were removed, the intrahepatic bile duct and hilar bile duct merged. The left end of the bile duct split was confirmed by realtime ultrasound. After location of portal vein was determined by ultrasound, vascular plastic surgery was perfomed to avoid stenosis. (3) Follow-up: 10 patients were followed up for 6-12 months, with a median Follow-up time of 8 months. One of 10 patients was suspected residual stones at the right peripheral hepatic anterior lobe by postoperative angiography at 2 months after surgery, and was not removed stones by choledochoscope. The patient had no recurrent symptoms after Ttube removal. The other 9 patients had no residual stones.
    Conclusion:RVS applied in complicated hepatolithiasis is helpful for the precise intraoperative diagnosis, and the surgical treatment can be safe and effective.

     

/

返回文章
返回