加速康复外科在腹腔镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石中的应用价值

Application value of enhanced recovery after surgery in the laparoscopic surgery for cholecystolithiasis comorbid with choledocholithiasis

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨加速康复外科(ERAS)在腹腔镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石中的应用价值。
    方法:采用前瞻性研究方法。选择2016年9月至2018年9月遵义医科大学第三附属医院收治的52例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者的临床资料。采用随机数字表法将患者分为两组,患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除+胆总管切开取石+胆道镜探查取石+T管引流术(或胆总管一期缝合术)的围术期处理采用ERAS理念指导方案,设为观察组;患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除+胆总管切开取石+胆道镜探查取石+T管引流术(或胆总管一期缝合术)的围术期处理采用传统方案,设为对照组。观察指标:(1)手术情况。(2)术后情况。(3)术后并发症情况。(4)术后疼痛评分。(5)围术期肝功能及血常规变化情况。采用门诊和电话方式进行随访,了解患者术后6个月内并发症发生情况。随访时间截至2019年3月。正态分布的计量资料以±s表示,组间比较采用配对t检验或重复测量方差分析。计数资料以绝对数或百分比表示,组间比较采用x2检验或Fisher确切概率法。
    结果:筛选出符合条件的患者52例,男20例,女32例;平均年龄为53岁,年龄范围为25~68岁。52例患者中,观察组30例,对照组22例。(1)手术情况:观察组患者手术时间、术中出血量分别为(133±19)min、(47±21)mL,对照组上述指标分别为(136±22)min、(49±23)mL,两组患者上述指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=-0.386,-0.211,P>0.05)。(2)术后情况:观察组患者术后首次下床活动时间、术后首次进食时间、术后首次肛门排气时间、术后住院时间、住院费用分别为(18±4)h、(19±5)h、(28±2)h、(4.0±1.0)d、(1.82±0.22)万元,对照组上述指标分别为(29±7)h、(46±9)h、(37±4)h、(6.6±1.6)d、(2.25±0.29)万元,两组患者上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=-7.054,-14.169,-9.426,-6.582, -5.809,P<0.05)。(3)术后并发症情况:观察组患者总体并发症发生率为3.3%(1/30),其中胆汁漏1例,经对症支持治疗后痊愈;对照组患者总体并发症发生率为27.3%(6/22),其中胆汁漏2例,出血、腹腔感染、肺部感染、泌尿系统感染各1例,经对症支持治疗后痊愈。两组患者总体并发症发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(x2=4.358,P<0.05)。(4)术后疼痛评分:观察组患者术后疼痛评分术后6 h到术后48 h由(2.4±0.7)分变化为(1.9±0.9)分,对照组患者由(4.1±0.7)分变化为(2.9±0.9)分,两组患者术后疼痛评分变化趋势比较,差异有统计学意义(F=78.053,P<0.05)。(5)围术期肝功能及血常规变化情况:观察组患者丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)术前到术后第3天从(77±20)U/L变化为(53±12)U/L,天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)术前到术后第3天从(85±22)U/L变化为(61±17)U/L,γ谷氨酰转移酶(GGT)术前到术后第3天从(166±39)U/L变化为(55±24)U/L,总胆红素(TBil)术前到术后第3天从(40±13)μmol/L变化为(29±12)μmol/L,白细胞(WBC)计数术前到术后第3天从(7.0±2.0)×109/L变化为(6.8±1.9)×109/L;对照组患者上述指标变化情况分别为(79±23)U/L变化为(62±14)U/L,(88±24)U/L变化为(64±17)U/L,(179±34)U/L变化为(74±29)U/L,(45±13)μmol/L变化为(35±12)μmol/L,(7.9±2.4)×109/L变化为(7.5±1.9)×109/L。观察组与对照组ALT、AST、GGT、TBiL、WBC计数表现为术后第1天升高,术后第3天逐渐下降的趋势,两组患者上述指标变化趋势比较,差异均无统计学意义(F=0.058,0.471,3.021,1.593,2.172, P>0.05)。
    结论:ERAS用于腹腔镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石安全、有效。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To explore the clinical application value of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the laparoscopic surgery for cholecystolithiasis comorbid with choledocholithiasis.
    Methods:The prospective study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 52 patients with cholecystolithiasis comorbid with choledocholithiasis who were admitted to the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University from September 2016 to September 2018 were collected. Patients were divided into 2 groups by random number table: patients in observation group received laparoscopic cholecystectomy + choledocholithotomy + choledochoscopic exploration + Ttube drainage (or primary suture of common bile duct) and perioperative management guided by the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), and patients in control group received traditional perioperative management. Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations; (2) postoperative situations; (3) postoperative complications; (4) postoperative pain scores; (5) changes in hepatic function and blood routine during perioperative period. Followup using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect complications during the postoperative 6 months up to March 2019. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the paired t test or repeated ANOVA. Count data were described as absolute numbers and percentages, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chisquare test or Fisher exact probability.
    Results:Fiftytwo patients were screened for eligibility, including 20 males and 32 females, aged 25-68 years, with an average age of 53 years. There were 30 patients in the observation group and 22 in the control group. (1) Surgical situations: the operation time and volume of intraoperative blood loss were (133±19)minutes and (47±21)mL in the observation group, and (136±22)minutes and (49±23)mL in the control group, respectively, showing no significant difference between the two groups (t=-0.386,-0.211, P>0.05). (2) Postoperative situations: time to outofbed activity, time to initial food intake, time to first anal flatus, duration of postoperative hospital stay, and hospital expenses were (18± 4)hours, (19±5)hours, (28±2)hours, (4.0±1.0)days, and (1.82±0.22)×104 yuan in the observation group, and (29±7)hours, (46±9)hours, (37±4)hours, (6.6±1.6)days, and (2.25±0.29)×104 yuan in the control group, respectively, showing significant differences between the two groups (t=-7.054,-14.169,-9.426, -6.582,-5.809, P<0.05). (3) Postoperative complications: 1 of 30 patients in the observation group had postoperative biliary leakage, with a postoperative complication rate of 3.3%, and was cured after symptomatic support treatment. Six of 22 patients in the control group had postoperative complication, with a postoperative complication rate of 27.3%, including 2 of biliary leakage, 1 of hemorrhage, 1 of abdominal infection, 1 of pulmonary infection, 1 of urinary infection, and they were cured after symptomatic support treatment. There was a significant difference between the two groups (x2=4.358, P<0.05). (4) Postoperative pain scores: from postoperative 6 hours to 48 hours, the postoperative pain score changed from 2.4±0.7 to 1.9±0.9 in the observation group, and from 4.1±0.7 to 2.9±0.9 in the control group, respectively, showing a significant difference in the changing trend between the two groups (F=78.053, P<0.05). (5) Changes in hepatic function and blood routine during perioperative period: from preoperation to postoperative 3 days, levels of alamine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), gammaglutamyltransferase (GGT), total bilirubin (TBil), and count of white blood cells in the observation group changed from (77±20)U/L to (53±12)U/L, from (85±22)U/L to (61±17)U/L, from (166±39)U/L to (55±24)U/L, from (40±13)μmol/L to (29± 12)μmol/L, from (7.0±2.0)×109/L to (6.8±1.9)×109/L, and changed from (79±23)U/L to (62±14)U/L, from (88±24)U/L to (64±17)U/L, from (179±34)U/L to (74±29)U/L, from (45±13)μmol/L to (35± 12)μmol/L, from (7.9±2.4)×109/L to (7.5±1.9)×109/L in the control group, respectively. The levels of ALT, AST, GGT, TBiL, and count of WBC showed increasing at postoperative 1 day, and decreasing at postoperative 3 days. There was no significant difference in the changing trend between the two groups (F=0.058, 0.471, 3.021, 1.593, 2.172, P>0.05).
    Conclusion:ERAS is safe and effective in the laparoscopic surgery for choledocholithiasis comorbid with cholecystolithiasis.

     

/

返回文章
返回