胃癌根治术后吻合口漏发生的危险因素分析及建立风险预测评分模型

Risk factors of anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and establishment of risk prediction scoring model

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨胃癌根治术后吻合口漏发生的危险因素,建立术后吻合口漏风险预测评分模型。
    方法:采用回顾性病例对照研究方法。收集2000年2月至2017年12月四川省宜宾市第一人民医院收治的1 757例行胃癌根治术患者的临床病理资料;男1 207例,女550例;年龄为(59±11)岁,年龄范围为48~70岁。观察指标:(1)随访情况。(2)影响胃癌根治术后吻合口漏发生的危险因素分析。(3)风险预测评分模型的建立及验证。(4)风险预测评分及不同评分患者术后发生吻合口漏的概率。采用门诊和电话方式进行随访,了解患者胃癌根治术后吻合口漏发生情况及有无因吻合口漏引起的二次手术或死亡情况。随访时间截至2018年6月。正态分布的计量资料以Mean±SD表示。计数资料以绝对数表示。单因素分析采用x2检验,多因素分析采用Logistic回归模型,应用 Hosmer-Lemeshow检验和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线检测模型的区分度和拟合优度。
    结果:(1)随访情况: 1 757例患者中,800例获得随访,随访时间为出院后1周、1、3、6个月。随访期间,75例患者发生吻合口漏,其中60例经保守治疗后痊愈,9例行二次手术后痊愈,6例因感染性休克和心肺衰竭相关并发症死亡。(2)影响胃癌根治术后吻合口漏发生的危险因素分析。单因素分析结果显示:患者术前合并糖尿病、术前肺功能不全、术前白蛋白水平及术中出血量是影响胃癌根治术后吻合口漏发生的相关因素(x2=5.604,4.975,18.563,35.688,P<0.05)。多因素分析结果显示:术前合并糖尿病、术前肺功能不全、术前白蛋白水平<30 g/L及术中出血量>400 mL是影响胃癌根治术后吻合口漏发生的独立危险因素(比值比=2.337,1.946,3.478,4.357,95%可信区间为1.136~4.804,1.022~3.705,1.871~6.464,2.678~7.090, P<0.05)。(3)风险预测评分模型的建立及验证。根据多因素Logistic回归结果建立风险预测方程:P= 1/1+exp(4.092-0.666*X1-0.849*X2-1.246*X3-1.472*X4),采用Hosmer-Lemeshow检验检测回归方程的拟合优度(P=0.287)。采用ROC曲线评价回归方程的区分度,曲线下面积为0.734(95%可信区间为0.689~0.834,P=0.002)。(4)风险预测评分及不同评分患者术后发生吻合口漏的概率。患者术前合并糖尿病、术前肺功能不全、术前白蛋白水平<30 g/L、术中出血量>400 mL其胃癌根治术后吻合口漏风险评分分别为1、1、2、2分。风险预测评分总分为0、1、2、3、4、5、 6分患者术后发生吻合口漏的概率分别为1.6%、3.2%、5.9%、10.1%、19.3%、31.8%、47.6%。评分≥3分患者发生吻合口漏的概率为13.7%,评分<3分患者发生吻合口漏的概率为3.5%。
    结论:术前合并糖尿病、肺功能不全、白蛋白水平<30 g/L及术中出血量>400 mL是影响胃癌根治术后吻合口漏发生的独立危险因素。建立胃癌根治术后吻合口漏风险预测评分模型,能够有效识别胃癌根治术后发生吻合口漏的高风险患者。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To investigate the risk factors of anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and establish a risk prediction scoring model for postoperative anastomotic leakage.
    Methods:The retrospective casecontrol study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 1 757 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the First People′s Hospital of Yibin from February 2000 to December 2017 were collected. There were 1 207 males and 550 females, aged (59±11)years, with a range from 48 to 70 years. Observation indicators: (1) followup situations; (2) risk factors analysis of anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer; (3) establishment of risk prediction scoring model and verification; (4) risk prediction scores and probability of anastomotic leakage in patients with different scores. Followup using outpatient examination and telephone interview to detect anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy and reoperation or death caused by anastomotic leakage up to June 2018. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD. Count data were described as absolute number. The univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were performed using the chisquare test and Logistic regression model respectively. The discrimination and fitting degree of the model were detected by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve.
    Results: (1) Followup situations: 800 of 1 757 patients were followed up at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after discharge. During the followup, 75 had anastomotic leakage, 60 of which recovered after conservative treatment, 9 recovered after reoperation, 6 died of complications including septic shock and cardiac and respiratory failure. (2) Risk factors analysis of anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: results of univariate analysis showed that patients with diabetes, preoperative pulmonary insufficiency, preoperative level of albumin and volume of intraoperative blood loss were related factors affecting anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer (x2=5.604, 4.975, 18.563, 35.688, P<0.05). Results of multivariate analysis showed that patients with diabetes, preoperative pulmonary insufficiency, preoperative level of albumin <30 g/L and volume of intraoperative blood loss >400 mL were independent risk factors affecting anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer (odds ratio=2.337, 1.946, 3.478, 4.357, 95% confidence interval: 1.136-4.804, 1.022-3.705, 1.871-6.464, 2.678-7.090, P<0.05). (3) Establishment of risk prediction scoring model and verification. Risk prediction equation was established according to the multivariate Logistic regression results: P=1/1+exp(4.092-0.666*X1-0.849*X2-1.246*X3-1.472*X4). The fitting degree of the model was detected by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (P=0.287). The discrimination of the model was detected by the ROC curve, with the area under curve as 0.734 (95% confidence interval: 0.689-0.834, P=0.002) . (4) Risk prediction scores and probability of anastomotic leakage in patients with different scores: the risk prediction scores of anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer were 1, 1, 2, 2 in patients with diabetes,preoperative pulmonary insufficiency, preoperative level of albumin <30 g/L and volume of intraoperative blood loss >400 mL, respectively. The incidence of anastomotic leakage of patients with risk prediction scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 was 1.6%, 3.2%, 5.9%, 10.1%, 19.3%, 31.8% and 47.6%, respectively. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was 13.7% of patients with score ≥3 and 3.5% of patients with score <3.
    Conclusions:Patients with diabetes, preoperative pulmonary insufficiency, preoperative level of albumin <30 g/L and volume of intraoperative blood loss >400 mL are independent risk factors affecting anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Establishment of a risk prediction scoring model for anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer can effectively identify highrisk patients with anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy.

     

/

返回文章
返回