亚急性胆囊穿孔CT检查影像学特征

Imaging features of computed tomography examination of subacute gallbladder perforation

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨亚急性胆囊穿孔的CT检查影像学特征。
    方法:采用回顾性横断面研究方法。收集2013年1月至2018年1月南京医科大学附属无锡第二医院收治的24例亚急性胆囊穿孔患者的临床资料。患者行腹部CT平扫和动脉期、门静脉期双期增强扫描检查。根据患者具体情况,选择行胆囊穿刺引流术、胆囊切除术、胆总管切开取石术、T管引流术。观察指标及评价标准:(1)CT检查情况。“堰塞湖征”定义为胆囊壁存在明显或隐匿性破口,胆囊壁不连续,门静脉期见明显中断线,破口不强化;胆囊破口周围存在环形壁包裹的片状积液,形似“堰塞湖”状,可呈椭圆形、半圆形、扇形、三角形等;环形壁可为脓肿壁、肝脏边缘或由两者共同构成;脓肿壁内壁较光滑,外壁不规则,可伴炎性渗出影和索条影,脓肿壁静脉期强化明显。(2)治疗及随访情况。采用门诊和电话方式进行随访,了解患者出院后并发症发生情况。随访时间截至2018年1月。偏态分布的计量资料以M(范围)表示。
    结果:(1)CT检查情况。①检查完成情况和原发疾病情况:24例患者中,2例行腹部CT平扫检查,22例行腹部CT平扫和动脉期、门静脉期增强扫描检查;原发疾病均为胆道结石,18例位于胆囊腔,4例位于胆囊颈部,2例为胆囊结石合并胆总管结石, 24例患者结石最大径为2.0 cm(0.3~2.5 cm)。②亚急性胆囊穿孔破口情况。A.部位和数目:胆囊底部11例,体部7例(1例为体部多处穿孔),颈部1例,底部和体部多处穿孔2例,3例无法判断穿孔部位; B.最大径:2例隐匿性破口最大径<0.2 cm,其余22例患者破口最大径为0.5 cm(0.2~1.0 cm)。③“堰塞湖征”影像学表现:24例患者均有“堰塞湖征”。A.环形壁构成:环形壁为脓肿壁、肝脏边缘、两者共同构成分别为15、3、6例;B.胆囊被脓肿包绕:局部和完全包绕分别为21例和3例。④胆囊情况。A.形态:24例患者中,胆囊体积明显增大和轻度缩小分别为23例和1例;B.最大直径:中位值10.0 cm(6.0~13.0 cm); C.胆囊壁厚度:中位值0.5 cm(0.3~1.3 cm),水肿增厚。⑤其他积液征象:24例患者胆囊周围脂肪间隙密度增高,部分呈线条状、索条状改变。(2)治疗及随访情况:24例患者中,10例行LC,6例行开腹胆囊切除术,4例行胆囊切除+胆总管切开取石+T管引流术,1例行腹腔镜探查术后中转开腹行胆囊切除+胆总管切开取石+T管引流术,3例行胆囊穿刺引流术并抗炎治疗2个月后行胆囊切除术。22例患者获得术后随访,随访时间为6~31个月,中位随访时间为11个月。随访期间,2例患者发现术后残留结石(分别位于胆囊窝和胆总管末端),2例并发胆管炎、结石,1例因肿瘤死亡,其余17例患者未见结石复发和其他并发症发生,健康生存。结论:“堰塞湖征”可作为亚急性胆囊穿孔的CT检查影像学直接征象,有助于及时、准确地鉴别诊断和临床治疗。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To investigate the imaging features of computed tomography (CT) examination of subacute gallbladder perforation.
    Methods:The retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted. The clinical data of 24 patients with subacute gallbladder perforation who were admitted to the Affiliated Wuxi No.2 People′s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between January 2013 and January 2018 were collected. Patients underwent abdominal plain scan and enhanced scan in the arterial phase and portal venous phase of CT, and received percutaneous cholecystostomy, cholecystectomy, choledocholithotomy, T-tube drainage according to their conditions. Observation indicators and evaluation criteria: (1) CT examination situations. “Barrier lake sign” is defined as presence of obvious or occult crevasse in the discontinuous gallbladder wall, with interrupt line seen in the portal venous phase and without crevasse enhancement. There is patchy effusion circled by annular wall around crevasse of gallbladder, shape like barrier lake, appearing as oval, semicircle, circular sector, triangle, etc. Annular wall consists of abscess wall, liver margin or both of them. With smooth inner wall of the abscess and irregular outer wall, abscess wall may be complicated with inflammatory exudation and strip shadow, showing intense enhancement in the venous phase. (2) Treatment and follow-up situations. follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview to detect complications after discharge up to January 2018. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M (range).
    Results:(1) CT examination situations. ① Completion status and primary diseases: of 24 patients, 2 underwent abdominal plain scan, 22 underwent abdominal plain scan combined with enhanced scan in the arterial phase and portal venous phase. The primary disease of all the 24 patients was biliary stone, including 18 located in gallbladder cavity, 4 located at gallbladder neck and 2 combined with gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones. The maximum diameter was 2.0 cm (range, 0.3-2.5 cm) in the 24 patients. ② Crevasse of subacute gallbladder perforation: perforations were detected at the bottom of gallbladder in 11 patients, at body of gallbladder in 7 patients (1 with multiple perforations), at gallbladder neck in 1 patient, at bottom and body of gallbladder in 2 patients, and perforation spot was unable to judge in 3 patients. The maximum diameter of occult crevasses was <0.2 cm in 2 patients and maximum diameter of crevasses was 0.5 cm (range, 0.2-1.0 cm) in other 22 with defined perforation spot. ③ Imaging manifestations of “barrier lake sign”: 24 patients had manifestation of “barrier lake sign”. Annular wall consisted of abscess wall, liver margin or both of them was found in 15, 3, 6 patients respectively. Gallbladder was partially or totally wrapped by abscess in 21 and 3 patients respectively. ④ Gallbladder situation: of 24 patients, 23 and 1 had gall bladder volume increased significantly and decreased slightly, with a maximum diameter of 10.0 cm (range, 6.0- 13.0 cm) and thickness of hydropic gallbladder wall as 0.5 cm (range, 0.3-1.3 cm). ⑤ Other effusion signs: 24 patients had increased fat interval density around gallbladder, partly showing cordlike and linelike changes. (2) Treatment and follow-up situations: of 24 patients, 10 underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 6 underwent open cholecystectomy, 4 underwent cholecystectomy+choledocholithotomy+T-tube drainage, 1 was converted to open cholecystectomy+choledocholithotomy+T-tube drainage after laparoscopic exploration, 3 underwent cholecystectomy at 2 months after percutaneous cholecystostomy combined with antiinflammatory treatment. Of 24 patients, 22 were followed up for 6-31 months with a median time of 11 months. During the follow-up, 2 patients were detected residual stones at fossa for gallbladder and end of the common bile duct, 2 were detected cholangitis with stones, 1 died of tumor, and other 17 survived well without recurrence of calculus or other complications.
    Conclusion:The “barrier lake sign” is a typical feature of CT examination of subacute gallbladder perforation, which provides timely and accurately differential diagnosis and clinical treatment.

     

/

返回文章
返回