血红素氧合酶-1对大鼠肝移植缺血再灌注损伤后缺氧诱导因子-1α 和血管内皮生长因子表达的影响

Effect of heme oxygenase-1 on expressions of hypoxia inducing factor 1 alpha and vascular endothelial growth factor 1 alpha after orthotopic liver transplantation ischemia reperfusion injury in rats

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨血红素氧合酶1(HO-1)对大鼠肝移植缺血再灌注损伤后肝脏组织中缺氧诱导因子1α(HIF-1α)、VEGF的表达和肝内血管再生的影响。
    方法:采用实验研究方法。240只大鼠按随机数字表法,分为3组,每组80只,空病毒组大鼠转染空病毒,诱导组大鼠转染HO-1过表达腺病毒,抑制组大鼠转染HO-1 RNAi腺病毒。大鼠进行1:1-配对,选取体质量较小者作为供体,体质量较大者作为受体,参照“二袖套”法大鼠肝移植模型行肝移植。供、受体大鼠均于手术前24 h经尾静脉注射腺病毒。(1)术前腺病毒转染效率检测:注射腺病毒后12、24 h,Western blot检测3组大鼠肝脏组织中HO-1的表达量。(2)肝移植术后受体大鼠肝功能检测:肝移植术后1、3、7、14 d检测3组受体大鼠肝功能指标(ALT、AST、ALP、GGT)。(3)肝移植术后受体大鼠肝组织病理形态学和损伤评分:术后1 d和14 d取受体大鼠肝脏组织制备成石蜡切片,HE染色观察,并采用Suzuki损伤评分标准评价。(4)Western blot检测受体大鼠肝脏组织中HIF-1α、VEGF、HO-1相对蛋白表达量。(5)免疫荧光染色检测3组受体大鼠肝移植术后14 d肝脏组织中血管性血友病因子(vWF),计数小血管数量。正态分布的计量资料以±s表示,两组间比较采用独立样本的t检验,多组间比较采用单因素方差分析,两两比较采用LSD检验。
    结果:(1)术前腺病毒转染效率检测:空病毒组、诱导组和抑制组大鼠术前注射腺病毒12 h时肝脏组织中HO-1相对表达量分别为1.08±0.16、1.18±0.21、0.87±0.26,24 h时分别为1.08±0.26、1.39±0.19、0.57±0.12,3组不同时间点比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=4.232,36.513,P<0.05)。(2)肝移植术后受体大鼠肝功能情况:肝移植术后3 d空病毒组、诱导组和抑制组大鼠ALT分别为(504±67)U/L、(438±47)U/L、(490±39)U/L,3组比较,差异有统计学意义(F=3.517,P<0.05)。肝移植术后7d 空病毒组、诱导组和抑制组大鼠ALT分别为(443±49)U/L、(382±49)U/L、(493±44)U/L,AST分别为(430±34)U/L、(372±50)U/L、(455±62)U/L,ALP分别为(455±38)U/L、(394±25)U/L、(470±72)U/L,3组上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=10.950,5.667,5.398,P<0.05)。肝移植术后14 d空病毒组、诱导组和抑制组大鼠ALT分别为(394±46)U/L、 (283±47)U/L、(446±43)U/L,AST分别为(361±68)U/L、(288±60)U/L、(422±51)U/L,ALP分别为(417±17)U/L、(332±46)U/L、(423±63)U/L,GGT分别为(4.5±1.1)U/L、(2.5±0.5)U/L、(4.3±1.3)U/L,3组上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=26.906,9.924,8.013,9.279,P<0.05)。(3)肝移植术后受体大鼠肝脏组织病理形态学和损伤评分:肝移植术后1 d空病毒组、诱导组和抑制组大鼠肝脏组织均见细胞肿胀,胞质疏松,汇管区见数量不等炎性细胞浸润。术后14 d空病毒组大鼠见汇管区仍有少量炎症细胞浸润,肝细胞排列基本正常,但稍显肿胀。诱导组大鼠见肝细胞肿胀较前减少、肝小叶结构基本正常。抑制组大鼠见肝细胞出现小片状、局灶性坏死,汇管区大量炎症细胞浸润、胆管结构破坏。空病毒组、诱导组、抑制组受体大鼠肝移植术后1 d Suzuki损伤评分分别为(6.7±1.7)分、(6.1±1.2)分、(7.6±1.3)分,3组比较,差异无统计学意义(F=2.257,P>0.05)。术后14 d Suzuki损伤评分分别为(4.0±0.8)分、(2.9±0.8)分、(5.1±1.4)分, 3组比较,差异有统计学意义(F=9.776,P<0.05)。(4)Western blot检测结果显示:空病毒组、诱导组和抑制组受体大鼠肝移植术后1d肝脏组织中相关蛋白的相对表达量:HIF-1α分别为0.21±0.10、0.23±0.09、0.17±0.06,VEGF(43 KD)分别为0.30±0.12、0.34±0.14、0.29±0.11,3组上述指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(F=0.902,0.410,P>0.05);VEGF(24 KD)分别为1.21±0.25、2.13±0.40、0.91±0.22,HO-1分别 为0.55±0.12、0.72±0.12、0.26±0.07,3组上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=35.158,39.082,P<0.05)。空病毒组、诱导组和抑制组受体大鼠肝移植术后7 d肝脏组织中相关蛋白的相对表达量:HIF-1α分别为0.49±0.22、0.83±0.26、0.24±0.09,VEGF(43 KD)分别为0.46±0.13、0.63±0.19、0.30±0.12,VEGF(24 KD)分别为0.98±0.37、1.60±0.33、0.64±0.18,HO-1分别为0.98±0.37、1.49±0.46、0.75±0.26,3组上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=16.853,10.021,20.756,8.156,P<0.05)。(5)免疫荧光染色检测结果显示:空病毒组、诱导组、抑制组大鼠肝移植术后14 d小血管数量分别为(7.9±2.0)条、(10.6±1.9)条、(7.6±1.9)条,3组比较,差异有统计学意义(F=5.921,P<0.05)。
    结论:HO-1能够促进大鼠肝移植缺血再灌注损伤后肝脏组织中HIF-1α和VEGF表达并增加肝内血管再生,明显减轻肝移植术后胆道缺血再灌注损伤。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To explore the effect of heme oxygenase1 (HO-1)on expressions of hypoxia inducing factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)and regeneration of hepatic vascular plexus after orthotopic liver transplantation ischemiareperfusion injury in rats.
    Methods:The experimental study was conducted. According to the random number table, 240 SD rats were divided into the 3 groups, 80 rats in each group. Empty virus group: rats were transfected with the empty virus. Induced group: rats were transfected with HO-1 overexpression adenovirus. Inhibited group: rats were transfected with HO-1 RNAi adenovirus. Rats were made pairs (1:1) and established rat liver transplantation model according to “two cuffs method”. Rats with less weight and with heavier weight were respectively chosen as donor rats and recipient rats, and then recieved tail intravenous injection of adenovirus at 24 hours before operation. (1) Detection of transfection efficiency of adenovirus before operation: HO-1 expression of liver tissue of rats in each group was detected by Western blot at 12 and 24 hours after injection of adenovirus. (2) Liver function test of recipient rats after liver transplantation: liver functions of recipient rats [alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gammaglutamyl transferase (GGT)] were detected at 1, 3, 7 and 14 days postoperatively. (3) Pathological histology of liver tissue and injury scores of recipient rats in the 3 groups after liver transplantation: paraffin sections of recipient rats in the 3 groups at postoperative 1 and 14 days were stained by HE staining and observed by light microscope, and were evaluated by Suzuki damage score standard. (4) Relative expressions of HIF-1α, VEGF and HO-1 in liver tissue of recipient rats were detected by Western blot. (5) Von Willebrand factor (vWF) in liver tissue of recipient rats at 14 days postoperatively was detected by immunofluorescence staining and small vessels were counted. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as ±s. Comparison between groups was analyzed by the independentsample t test, comparison among groups was done using oneway ANOVA, and pairwise comparison was analyzed by the LSD test.
    Results:(1) Detection of transfection efficiency of adenovirus before operation: the relative expression of HO-1 of liver tissue of rats at 12 and 24 hours preoperatively after injection of adenovirus was 1.08±0.16 and 1.08±0.26 in the empty virus group, 1.18±0.21 and 1.39±0.19 in the induced group, 0.87±0.26 and 0.57±0.12 in the inhibited group, respectively, with statistically significant differences in different time points (F=4.232, 36.513, P<0.05). (2) Liver function test of recipient rats after liver transplantation: level of ALT at 3 days postoperatively in the empty virus group, induced group and inhibited group was (504±67)U/L, (438±47)U/L and (490±39)U/L, with a statistically significant difference (F=3.517, P<0.05). Levels of ALT, AST and ALP at 7 days postoperatively were (443±49)U/L, (430±34)U/L, (455±38)U/L in the empty virus group and (382±49)U/L, (372±50)U/L, (394±25)U/L in the induced group and (493±44)U/L, (455±62)U/L, (470±72)U/L in the inhibited group, respectively, with statistically significant differences (F=10.950, 5.667, 5.398, P<0.05). Levels of ALT, AST, ALP and GGT at 14 days postoperatively were (394±46)U/L, (361±68)U/L, (417± 17)U/L, (4.5±1.1)U/L in the empty virus group and (283±47)U/L, (288±60)U/L, (332±46)U/L, (2.5±0.5)U/L in the induced group and (446±43)U/L, (422±51)U/L, (423±63)U/L, (4.3±1.3)U/L in the inhibited group, respectively, with statistically significant differences (F=26.906, 9.924, 8.013, 9.279, P<0.05). (3) Pathological histology of liver tissue and injury scores of recipient rats in the 3 groups after liver transplantation: liver cell swelling, loose cytoplasm and a varying quantity of inflammatory cell infiltration in the portal regions in the liver tissue of 3 groups were observed at 1 day postoperatively. A few inflammatory cell infiltrations in the portal regions, basically normal liver cell arrangement and a slightly swelling of liver cell were found in the empty virus group at 14 days postoperatively. Reduced liver cell swelling and basically normal structure of liver lobule were observed in the induced group. There were small patchy or focal necrosis of liver cell, masses of inflammatory cell infiltration in the portal regions and damage of bile duct in the inhibited group. Suzuki score at 1 day postoperatively in the empty virus group, induced group and inhibited group were respectively 6.7±1.7, 6.1±1.2 and 7.6±1.3, with no statistically significant difference (F=2.257, P>0.05). Suzuki score at 14 day postoperatively in the empty virus group, induced group and inhibited group were respectively 4.0±0.8, 2.9±0.8 and 5.1±1.4, with a statistically significant difference (F=9.776, P<0.05). (4) Western blot results: the relative expressions of HIF-1α and VEGF (43 KD) in liver tissue of recipient rats at 1 day postoperatively were 0.21±0.10, 0.30±0.12 in the empty virus group and 0.23±0.09, 0.34±0.14 in the induced group and 0.17±0.06, 0.29±0.11 in the inhibited group, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (F=0.902, 0.410, P>0.05). The relative expressions of VEGF (24 KD) and HO-1 in liver tissue of recipient rats at 1 day postoperatively were 1.21±0.25, 0.55±0.12 in the empty virus group and 2.13±0.40, 0.72±0.12 in the induced group and 0.91±0.22, 0.26±0.07 in the inhibited group, respectively, with statistically significant differences (F=35.158, 39.082, P<0.05). The relative expressions of HIF-1α, VEGF (43 KD), VEGF (24 KD) and HO-1 in liver tissue of recipient rats at 7 days postoperatively were 0.49±0.22, 0.46±0.13, 0.98±0.37, 0.98±0.37 in the empty virus group and 0.83±0.26, 0.63±0.19, 1.60±0.33, 1.49±0.46 in the induced group and 0.24±0.09, 0.30±0.12, 0.64±0.18, 0.75±0.26 in the inhibited group, respectively, with statistically significant differences (F=16.853, 10.021, 20.756, 8.156, P<0.05). (5) Immunofluorescence staining results: number of small vessels at 14 days postoperatively in the empty virus group, induced group and inhibited group was respectively 7.9±2.0, 10.6±1.9 and 7.6 ±1.9, with a statistically significant difference (F=5.921, P<0.05).
    Conclusion:HO-1 could promote expressions of HIF-1α and VEGF in liver tissue after liver transplantation ischemiareperfusion injury and regeneration of intrahepatic vascular plexus, and it also alleviate bile duct ischemiareperfusion injury after liver transplantation.

     

/

返回文章
返回