高分辨率MRI检查诊断直肠癌淋巴结转移及分期的准确性

Accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of the lymph node metastases and stage of rectal cancer

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨高分辨率MRI检查诊断直肠癌淋巴结转移及分期的准确性。
    方法:采用回顾性横断面研究方法。收集2014年4月至2016年4月北京大学人民医院收治的65例直肠癌患者的临床病理资料。肿瘤术后病理学检查:65例患者中,淋巴结转移阳性患者24例,阴性41例;N0期41例, N1期 14例,N2期10例。采用3.0T MRI及体部相控阵表面线圈采集图像。直肠癌淋巴结转移诊断标准:标准1:淋巴结边界不规则,不考虑其信号特征;标准2:淋巴结信号不均匀,不考虑边界特征;标准3:淋巴结边界不规则和(或)信号不均匀。直肠癌淋巴结分期(N分期)标准参照美国癌症联合会(AJCC)第七版分期。按照直肠淋巴引流途径将淋巴结位置分布分为:D1:直肠系膜筋膜内;D1a:肿瘤水平以上;D1b:肿瘤水平;D1c:肿瘤水平以下。D2:直肠上动脉及肠系膜下动脉根部周围。D3:盆腔侧方。观察指标:(1)高分辨率MRI检查依据3种标准诊断直肠癌淋巴结转移的效能及比较(以术后病理学检查结果为金标准)。(2)高分辨率MRI检查依据3种标准进行直肠癌N分期的效能及比较(以术后病理学检查结果为金标准)。(3)高分辨率MRI检查依据直肠癌淋巴结最大短径诊断转移的效能:①直肠癌转移阳性与阴性淋巴结最大短径分布范围;②以不同最大短径为阈值诊断转移的灵敏度、特异度、准确率、一致性(以术后病理学检查结果为金标准);③以诊断准确率最高的淋巴结最大短径为阈值诊断转移的准确率与依据3种标准诊断转移准确率的比较;④以诊断准确率最高的淋巴结最大短径为阈值联合(1)中效能最高的标准诊断转移的灵敏度、特异度、准确率、一致性(以术后病理学检查结果为金标准)及与以诊断准确率最高的淋巴结最大短径为阈值诊断转移的准确率比较。(4)高分辨率MRI检查依据3种标准诊断直肠癌淋巴结转移位置分布情况。(5)随访情况。采用门诊和电话方式进行随访,了解患者术后生存情况。随访时间截至2016年10月。灵敏度、特异度和准确率计算及率的比较采用χ2检验,采用κ检验一致性。κ≤0.40为一致性较低,0.40< κ≤0.60为中度一致,0.60<κ≤0.80为一致性较高,κ>0.80为一致性很高。
    结果:(1)高分辨率MRI检查依据3种标准诊断直肠癌淋巴结转移的效能及比较:采用高分辨率MRI检查依据标准1、2、3诊断直肠癌淋巴结转移的准确率分别为93.8%、87.7%、90.8%,与术后病理学检查结果的一致性分别为很高、较高、很高(κ=0.87,0.74,0.81,P<0.05);3者间诊断准确率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.495,P>0.05)。(2)高分辨率MRI检查依据3种标准进行直肠癌N分期的效能及比较:采用高分辨率MRI检查依据标准1、2、3进行直肠癌N分期的准确率分别为87.7%、83.1%、84.6%,与术后病理学检查结果的一致性均较高(κ=0.77,0.68,0.72,P<0.05);3者间N分期准确率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.567,P>0.05)。(3)高分辨率MRI检查依据直肠癌淋巴结最大短径诊断转移的效能:①直肠癌转移阳性与阴性淋巴结最大短径分布范围:直肠癌转移阳性淋巴结最大短径范围为3~18 mm,转移阴性淋巴结最大短径范围为1~9 mm;最大短径<3 mm淋巴结均为转移阴性,≥10 mm淋巴结均为转移阳性。②以不同最大短径为阈值诊断淋巴结转移的效能:以淋巴结最大短径>7 mm为直肠癌淋巴结转移阳性诊断标准时,诊断准确率最高,为70.8%,与术后病理学检查结果的一致性较低(κ=0.29,P<0.05)。③以淋巴结最大短径>7 mm为阈值诊断转移的准确率与依据3种标准诊断转移准确率的比较:4者比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=15.637,P<0.05);依据标准1、2、3诊断直肠癌淋巴结转移准确率均高于以淋巴结最大短径>7 mm为阈值诊断准确率(χ2=10.354,5.656,6.923,P<0.05)。④以淋巴结最大短径>7 mm为阈值联合标准3诊断直肠癌淋巴结转移的准确率及与以淋巴结最大短径>7 mm为阈值诊断转移的准确率比较:因3种标准诊断直肠癌淋巴结转移的准确率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),故选择标准3。以淋巴结最大短径>7 mm为阈值联合标准3诊断直肠癌淋巴结转移准确率为78.5%,与术后病理学检查结果的一致性较低(κ=0.36,P<0.05);与以 淋巴结最大短径>7 mm为阈值诊断准确率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.154,P>0.05)。(4)高分辨率MRI检查依据3种标准诊断直肠癌淋巴结转移位置分布情况:高分辨率MRI检查直肠癌转移阳性淋巴结大部分位于D1(占76.1%~83.1%),且与肿瘤位于同一水平(D1b占77.8%~81.4%)。(5)随访情况:65例患者中,54例获得术后随访。随访时间为6~25个月,中位随访时间为14个月。随访期间,7例患者发生远处转移,47例患者无瘤生存。
    结论:直肠癌患者术前行高分辨率MRI检查诊断淋巴结转移和N分期准确率较高。采用淋巴结形态学特征与大小结合为诊断标准,不能提高淋巴结转移诊断准确率。直肠癌转移阳性淋巴结大部分位于D1,且与肿瘤位于同一水平(D1b)。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To investigate the accuracy of highresolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosis of the lymph nodes metastases (LNMs) and stage of rectal cancer (RC).
    Methods:The retrospective crosssectional study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 65 patients with RC who were admitted to the Peking University People′s Hospital between April 2014 and April 2016 were collected. The results of postoperative pathological examination: of 65 patients with RC, 24 had positive LNMs and 41 had negative LNMs; N0, N1 and N2 were respectively detected in 41, 14 and 10 patients. Imaging data were captured using 3.0Tesla MRI and body phasedarray coil. Diagnostic criteria for LNMs of RC: criterion 1: irregular lymph node boundaries and signal characteristics were not considered; criterion 2: heterogeneous signal of lymph nodes and boundary characteristics were not considered; criterion 3: irregular lymph node boundaries and / or heterogeneous signal of lymph nodes. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) cancer staging manual (7th edition) have established the N staging scheme for RC. Lymph nodes distribution according to the rectal lymphatic drainage: D1 was located in fascia of the mesorectum; D1a above the level of tumor; D1b at the level of tumor; D 1c under the level of tumor; D2 around the superior rectal artery and root of inferior mesenteric artery; D3 on the side of pelvic cavity. Observation indicators: (1) Efficiency and comparison of LNMs of RC diagnosed by highresolution MRI according to the 3 criteria (postoperative pathological result as a gold standard). (2) Efficiency and comparison of N stage of RC diagnosed by highresolution MRI according to the 3 criteria (postoperative pathological result as a gold standard). (3) Efficiency of LNMs of RC diagnosed by highresolution MRI according to the maximum short diameter of lymph nodes: ① maximum short diameter distribution of positive and negative LNMs of RC; ② sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and consistency of LNMs diagnosed using different maximum short diameter of lymph nodes as a threshold (postoperative pathological result as a gold standard); ③ comparison of accuracy of LNMs diagnosed using maximum short diameter of lymph nodes with highest diagnostic accuracy as a threshold and using the 3 criteria; ④ sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and consistency (postoperative pathological result as a gold standard) of LNMs diagnosed using maximum short diameter of lymph nodes with highest diagnostic accuracy as a threshold combined with the highest efficiency in the (1), and its comparison in accuracy of LNMs with highest diagnostic accuracy as a threshold. (4) Distribution of LNMs of RC diagnosed by highresolution MRI according to the 3 criteria. (5) Followup situations. Followup using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect patients′ postoperative survival up to October 2016. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and comparison of ratio were respectively done by the chisquare test. Kappa test was used for consistency, κ≤0.40 was used as low consistency, 0.40<κ≤0.60 as moderate consistency, 0.60<κ≤0.80 as higher consistency, and κ>0.80 very high consistency.
    Results:(1) Efficiency and comparison of LNMs of RC diagnosed by highresolution MRI according to the 3 criteria: accuracies of LNMs of RC diagnosed by highresolution MRI according to the criterion 1, 2 and 3 were respectively 93.8%, 87.7% and 90.8%, showing very high, higher and very high consistencies compared with postoperative pathological results (κ=0.87, 0.74, 0.81, P<0.05), and with no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy among them (χ2=1.495, P>0.05). (2) Efficiency and comparison of N stage of RC diagnosed by highresolution MRI according to the 3 criteria: accuracies of N stage of RC diagnosed by highresolution MRI according to the criterion 1, 2 and 3 were respectively 87.7%, 83.1% and 84.6%, showing the same higher consistencies compared with postoperative pathological result (κ=0.77, 0.68, 0.72, P<0.05), and with no statistically significant difference in N stage among them (χ2=0.567, P>0.05). (3) Efficiency of LNMs of RC diagnosed by highresolution MRI according to the maximum short diameter of lymph nodes: ① maximum short diameter distribution of positive and negative LNMs of RC: maximum short diameter ranges were respectively 3-18 mm in positive LNMs and 1-9 mm in negative LNMs, and maximum short diameter <3 mm and ≥10 mm were respectively negative and positive LNMs. ② Efficiency of LNMs of RC diagnosed using different maximum short diameter of lymph nodes as a threshold: diagnostic accuracy of 70.8% was the highest when maximum short diameter >7 mm was used as a standard of positive LNMs, showing a low consistency compared with postoperative pathological result (κ=0.29, P<0.05). ③ Comparison of accuracy of LNMs diagnosed using maximum short diameter of lymph nodes >7 mm as a threshold and using the 3 criteria: there was a statistically significant difference among them (χ2=15.637, P<0.05); accuracies of LNMs of RC diagnosed by highresolution MRI according to the criterion 1, 2 and 3 were higher than that diagnosed using maximum short diameter of lymph nodes >7 mm as a threshold (χ2=10.354, 5.656, 6.923, P<0.05). ④ Comparison of accuracy of LNMs diagnosed using maximum short diameter of lymph nodes >7 mm combined with the criterion 3 as a threshold and using maximum short diameter >7 mm as a threshold: the criterion 3 was used as a threshold because there was no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy among the 3 criteria (P>0.05). Diagnostic accuracy was 78.5% when maximum short diameter >7 mm combined with the criterion 3 as a threshold, showing a low consistency compared with postoperative pathological result (κ=0.36, P<0.05), with no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy compared with maximum short diameter >7 mm as a threshold (χ2=0.154, P>0.05). (4) Distribution of LNMs of RC diagnosed by highresolution MRI according to the 3 criteria: positive LNMs of RC diagnosed by highresolution MRI located mostly in D1 (76.1%-83.1%)and D1b (77.8%-81.4%). (5) Followup situations: of 65 patients, 54 were followed up for 6-25 months, with a median time of 14 months. During the followup, 7 patients had distant metastases and 47 had tumorfree survival.
    Conclusions:There are higher accuracies of LNMs and N stage of RC diagnosed using preoperative highresolution MRI. Diagnostic accuracy of LNMs of RC cannot be improved when characteristics of lymph node morphology and size are used as a diagnostic standard. The positive LNMs of RC locate mostly in D1 and D1b.

     

/

返回文章
返回