距肛缘距离≤8.0 cm T1期直肠癌不同手术方式疗效及预后因素分析

Outcomes of different surgical approaches and prognostic factors of T1 rectal cancer with distance from anal verge ≤8.0 cm

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨经肛门局部切除术和经腹根治性切除术治疗距肛缘距离(DAV)≤8.0 cm T1期直肠癌的临床疗效,分析DAV≤8.0 cm T1期直肠癌患者行非姑息性切除术后预后因素。
    方法:采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2000年12月至2014年12月福建医科大学附属协和医院收治的82例DAV≤ 8.0 cm T1期直肠癌患者的临床病理资料。82例患者中,42例行经肛门局部切除术,设为局切组;40例行经腹根治性切除术,设为根治组。局切组患者若术后病理学检查结果提示存在高危因素,补充行经腹根治性切除术或术后行辅助放、化疗。观察指标:(1)两组患者手术及术后情况比较。(2)随访情况。(3)DAV≤8.0 cm T1期直肠癌患者行非姑息性切除术后预后因素分析。采用门诊和电话方式进行随访,了解患者排便功能、性功能、生存和肿瘤复发情况。随访时间截至2017年1月。正态分布的计量资料以±s表示,组间比较采用独立样本t检验。计数资料比较采用x2检验或Fisher确切概率法。采用KaplanMeier法计算总体生存率、无瘤生存率,采用Logrank检验进行生存分析。多因素分析采用COX风险回归模型。
    结果:
    (1)两组患者手术及术后情况比较:82例患者均顺利完成手术。局切组42例患者中,28例行单纯经肛门局部切除术,2例术后1个月内补充行经腹根治性切除术,6例术后行辅助放、化疗,5例术后行辅助放疗, 1例术后行辅助化疗(患者无法耐受未完成规定疗程)。根治组40例患者均行标准低位经腹直肠前切除或联合腹会阴切除的直肠癌根治性切除术。局切组患者DAV、手术时间、术中出血量、术后胃肠功能恢复时间、肺部感染患者、术后住院时间分别为(4.9±1.3)cm、(65±33)min、(11±7)mL、(1.2±0.4)d、0、(2.2±0.9)d,根治组患者分别为(6.7±1.9)cm、(256±35)min、(65±47)mL、(2.4±0.8)d、6例、(6.9±1.1)d,两组患者上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=4.882,12.448,3.553,4.025, x2=6.797,t=10.367, P<0.05);局切组腹腔感染、切口感染、尿路感染、炎症性肠梗阻、吻合口瘘、乳糜漏、直肠阴道瘘患者均为0、切缘阳性患者为1例,根治组分别为1、0、0、1、0、2、1、0例,两组患者上述指标比较,差异均无统计学意义 (x2=1.063,1.063,2.153,1.063,P>0.05)。所有并发症经保守治疗后治愈。(2)随访情况:82例患者中,67例获得排便功能随访(局切组和根治组分别为37、30例),40例患者获得性功能随访(局切组和根治组分别为25、15例),76例获得生存随访;随访时间为1~145个月,中位随访时间为31个月。局切组和根治组患者肛门失禁分别为0、4例,性功能障碍分别为0、3例,两组患者上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(x2=5.247,5.405,P<0.05)。局切组和根治组患者5年肿瘤局部复发例数分别为1例、0,5年总体生存率分别为94.1%、87.6%,5年无瘤生存率分别为91.0%、87.6%,两组上述指标比较,差异均无统计学意义 (x2=0.833,2.313,0.849,P>0.05)。(3)DAV≤8.0 cm T1期直肠癌患者行非姑息性切除术后预后因素分析:多因素分析结果显示:年龄是影响DAV≤8.0 cm T1期直肠癌患者行非姑息性切除术后预后的独立因素(RR=1.254,95%可信区间:1.055~1.491,P<0.05)。
    结论:经肛门局部切除术治疗DAV≤8.0 cm T1期直肠癌可获得与经腹根治性切除术相近的肿瘤局部控制效果和远期预后,且前者在排便功能和性功能保护上优于后者。年龄是影响DAV≤8.0 cm T1期直肠癌患者行非姑息性切除术后预后的独立因素。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To investigate the clinical outcomes of transanal local excision (LE) and transabdominal radical surgery (RS) for T1 rectal cancer with distance from anal verge (DAV) ≤8.0 cm, and analyze the prognostic factors after nonpalliative resection of T1 rectal cancer with DAV ≤8.0 cm.
    Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 82 T1 rectal cancer patients with DAV ≤8.0 cm who were admitted to the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital between December 2000 and December 2014 were collected. Among 82 patients, 42 undergoing transanal LE and 40 undergoing transabdominal RS were allocated into the LS and RS groups, respectively. Fortytwo patients in the LE group received transabdominal RS or postoperative adjuvant radiochemotherapy if results of postoperative pathological examination showed high risk. Observation indicators: (1) comparisons of surgical and postoperative situations between the 2 groups; (2) followup situations; (3) prognostic factors analysis after nonpalliative resection of T1 rectal cancer with DAV ≤8.0 cm. Followup using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect the defecation and sexual functions, survival and tumor recurrence up to January 2017. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as ±s, and comparisons between groups were evaluated with an independent sample t test. Comparisons of count data were analyzed using the chisquare test or Fisher exact probability. The Kaplan Meier method was used for calculating overall survival rate and tumorfree rate, and survival was analyzed using the Logrank test. Multivariate analysis was done using the COX regression model.
    Results:(1) Comparisons of surgical and postoperative situations between the 2 groups: all the 82 patients underwent successful surgery. Of 42 patients in the LE group, 28 underwent single transanal LE, 2 underwent additional transabdominal RS within 1 month postoperatively, 6 underwent postoperative adjuvant radiochemotherapy, 5 underwent postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy and 1 underwent postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (didn′t complete course due to poor tolerance). Forty patients in the RS group underwent transabdominal anterior resection of rectum or combined with abdominal perineal resection for rectal cancer. DAV, operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, time of postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery, cases with pulmonary infection and duration of postoperative hospital stay were (4.9±1.3)cm, (65±33)minutes, (11±7)mL, (1.2±0.4)days, 0, (2.2±0.9)days in the LE group and (6.7±1.9)cm, (256±35)minutes, (65± 47) mL, (2.4±0.8)days, 6, (6.9±1.1)days in the RS group, respectively, with statistically significant differences (t=4.882, 12.448, 3.553, 4.025, x2=6.797, t=10.367, P<0.05). Cases with intraperitoneal infection, wound infection, urinary tract infection, inflammatory intestinal obstruction, anastomotic fistula, chyle leakage, rectovaginal fistula and positive surgical margin were 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1 in the LE group and 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 2, 1, 0 in the RS group, respectively, with no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (x2=1.063, 1.063, 2.153, 1.063, P>0.05). All patients with complications were cured by conservative treatment. (2) Followup situations: of 82 patients, 67 were followed up for defecation function (37 in the LE group and 30 in the RS group), 40 were followed up for sexual function (25 in the LE group and 15 in the RS group), 76 were followed up for survival. Followup time was 1-145 months, with a median time of 31 months. Cases with fecal incontinence and sexual dysfunction were respectively 0, 0 in the LE group and 4, 3 in the RS group, showing statistically significant differences (x2=5.247, 5.405, P<0.05). Cases with 5year local recurrence, 5year overall survival rate and 5year tumorfree survival rate were respectively 1, 94.1%, 91.0% in the LE group and 0, 87.6%, 87.6% in the RS group, showing no statistically significant differences (x2=0.833, 2.313, 0.849, P>0.05). (3) Prognostic factors analysis after nonpalliative resection of T1 rectal cancer with DAV ≤8.0 cm: results of multivariate analysis showed that age was an independent factor affecting prognosis of T1 rectal cancer patients with DAV ≤8.0 cm after nonpalliative resection (RR=1.254, 95% confidence interval: 1.055-1.491, P<0.05).
    Conclusions: Transanal LE in treatment of T1 rectal cancer patients with DAV ≤ 8.0 cm is consistent with RS in local control and long term prognosis, and the protection of defecation and sexual functions in LE is superior to that in RS. Age is an independent factor affecting prognosis of T1 rectal cancer patients with DAV ≤8.0 cm after nonpalliative resection.

     

/

返回文章
返回