腹腔镜胃旁路术和二甲双胍治疗肥胖症合并2型糖尿病的临床疗效及影响因素分析

Clinical efficacy and influencing factors of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and metformin in the treatment of obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨腹腔镜胃旁路术和口服二甲双胍治疗肥胖症合并2型糖尿病的临床疗效,以及糖尿病缓解率的影响因素。
    方法:采用病例对照研究方法。收集2010年6月至2015年6月商丘市第一人民医院(43例)和中山大学附属第一医院(129例)收治的172例肥胖症合并2型糖尿病患者的临床资料。172例患者中,82例行腹腔镜胃旁路术治疗,设为A组;90例口服二甲双胍治疗,设为B组。观察指标:(1)随访情况。(2)两组患者治疗后代谢指标比较。(3)行腹腔镜胃旁路术治疗肥胖症合并2型糖尿病患者糖尿病缓解率影响因素分析。(4)口服二甲双胍治疗肥胖症合并2型糖尿病患者糖尿病缓解率影响因素分析。采用门诊和电话方式进行随访,了解患者治疗方式相关并发症发生情况,定期检测代谢指标水平。随访时间截至2017年1月。正态分布计量资料以±s表示,组间比较采用独立样本t检验,重复 测量数据采用重复测量方差分析。计数资料比较和单因素分析均采用x2检验。多因素分析采用Logistic回归。
    结果:(1)随访情况:172例患者均获得治疗后随访,随访时间为19~43个月,中位随访时间为 28个月。随访期间,A组患者中,5例出现轻度腹泻,1例于术后1年出现缺铁性贫血,均经对症治疗后 好转。B组患者无治疗相关并发症发生。(2)两组患者治疗后代谢指标比较:A组患者行腹腔镜胃旁路术前体质量、BMI、餐后2 h血糖、餐后2 h C肽、糖化血红蛋白、空腹胰岛素、餐后2 h胰岛素、低密度脂蛋白、高血压病分别为(89±6)kg、(31.5±2.0)kg/m2、(19.4±3.9)mmol/L、(3.52±0.32)μg/L、15.7%±5.3%、(8.0±1.4)uIU/L、(20.6±2.5)uIU/L、(3.7±1.3)mmol/L、24例,术后上述指标分别为(77±16)kg、(24.2±2.9)kg/m2、(10.6±2.6)mmol/L、(7.19±2.23)μg/L、5.3%±4.5%、(9.2±4.3)uIU/L、(28.3±2.9)uIU/L、(2.2±2.1)mmol/L、9例,术前与术后上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=2.112,3.026,1.253,2.107,1.257,3.473,1.223,2.584, x2=8.540,P<0.05)。B组患者口服二甲双胍治疗前空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖、空腹C肽、餐后2 h C肽、糖化血红蛋白、空腹胰岛素、餐后2 h胰岛素分别为(11.3±2.5)mmol/L、(18.5±4.4)mmol/L、(1.54±0.33)μg/L、(3.57±0.91)μg/L、17.5%±8.0%、(8.2±1.3)uIU/L、(21.2±2.6)uIU/L,治疗后上述指标分别为(6.6±1.1)mmol/L、(10.2±2.8)mmol/L、(3.52±1.34)μg/L、(7.68±1.94)μg/L、5.4%±2.1%、(9.6±3.9)uIU/L、(30.3±3.1)uIU/L,治疗前与治疗后上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=1.245,3.224,3.127,2.064,3.672,2.074,1.137,P<0.05)。A组和B组患者治疗后糖尿病缓解率分别为14.6%和11.1%,多余体质量减少率(EWL)分别为80%±15%和60%±10%。两组患者治疗后体质量、BMI、EWL比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=1.973,2.326,2.347,P<0.05);糖尿病缓解率比较,差异无统计学意义(x2=0.477,P>0.05)。(3)行腹腔镜胃旁路术治疗肥胖症合并2型糖尿病患者糖尿病缓解率影响因素分析:单因素分析结果显示:BMI、糖尿病病程、低密度脂蛋白是行腹腔镜胃旁路术治疗肥胖症合并2型糖尿病患者糖尿病缓解率的影响因素,差异均有统计学意义(x2=11.267,9.519,5.567,P<0.05)。多因素分析结果显示:糖尿病病程<10年是行腹腔镜胃旁路术治疗肥胖症合并2型糖尿病患者糖尿病缓解率良好的独立影响因素,差异有统计学意义(OR=2.202,95%可信区间:1.418~3.420,P<0.05)。(4)口服二甲双胍治疗肥胖症合并2型糖尿病患者糖尿病缓解率影响因素分析:单因素分析结果显示:糖尿病病程、糖化血红蛋白、低密度脂蛋白是口服二甲双胍治疗肥胖症合并2型糖尿病患者糖尿病缓解率的影响因素,差异均有统计学意义(x2=6.306,7.758,4.652,P<0.05)。多因素分析结果显示:糖化血红蛋白<15.0%是口服二甲双胍治疗肥胖症合并2型糖尿病患者糖尿病缓解率良好的独立影响因素,差异有统计学意义(OR= 3.167,95%可信区间:1.586~6.325,P<0.05)。
    结论:腹腔镜胃旁路术和口服二甲双胍治疗肥胖症合并 2型糖尿病均安全有效,糖尿病缓解率相当,前者减轻体质量优势更明显。糖尿病病程<10年和糖化血红蛋白<15.0%分别是行腹腔镜胃旁路术和口服二甲双胍治疗肥胖症合并2型糖尿病患者糖尿病缓解率良好的独立影响因素。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of the laparoscopic RouxenY gastric bypass (LRYGB) and metformin in the treatment of obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and influencing factors of remission rate of diabetes.
    Methods:The casecontrol study was conducted. The clinical data of 172 obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were admitted to the First People′s Hospital of Shangqiu (43 patients) and the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yatsen University (129 patients) from June 2010 to June 2015 were collected. Of 172 patients, 82 undergoing LRYGB were allocated into the group A and 90 taking oral metformin were allocated into the group B. Observation indicators: (1) followup situations; (2) comparison of metabolic indices after treatment between the 2 groups; (3) influencing factors analysis of remission rate of diabetes in patients undergoing LRYGB; (4) influencing factors analysis of remission rate of diabetes in patients taking oral metformin. Followup using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect occurrence of treatmentrelated complications up to January 2017, and metabolic indices were measured regularly. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as ±s and comparison between groups was analyzed using the independentsample t test. Repeated measurement data were analyzed by the repeated measures ANOVA. Comparisons of count data were evaluated by the chisquare test. The univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were respectively done using the chisquare test and Logistic regression model.
    Results:(1) Followup situations: 172 patients were followed up after treatment for 19-43 months, with a median time of 28 months. During the followup, 5 patients complicated with mild diarrhea and 1 complicated with iron deficiency anemia at 1 year postoperatively were improved by symptomatic treatment in the group A, and there was no treatmentrelated complications in the group B. (2) Comparison of metabolic indices after treatment between 2 groups: body mass, BMI, 2hour postprandial blood glucose (2HPBG), 2hour postprandial serum Cpeptide, glycosylated hemoglobin (GHb), fasting insulin, 2hour postprandial insulin (2HPI), lowdensity lipoprotein (LDL) and cases with hypertension in the group A were (89±6)kg, (31.5±2.0)kg/m2, (19.4±3.9)mmol/L, (3.52±0.32)μg/L, 15.7%±5.3%, (8.0±1.4)uIU/L, (20.6±2.5)uIU/L, (3.7±1.3)mmol/L, 24 before LRYGB and (77±16)kg, (24.2±2.9)kg/m2, (10.6±2.6)mmol/L, (7.19±2.23)μg/L, 5.3%±4.5%, (9.2± 4.3)uIU/L, (28.3±2.9)uIU/L, (2.2±2.1)mmol/L, 9 after LRYGB, respectively, with statistically significant differences between preoperative and postoperative indicators (F=2.112, 3.026, 1.253, 2.107, 1.257, 3.473, 1.223, 2.584, x2=8.540, P<0.05). Fasting blood glucose, 2HPBG, fasting serum Cpeptide, 2hour postprandial serum Cpeptide, GHb, fasting insulin and 2HPI in the group B were (11.3±2.5)mmol/L, (18.5±4.4)mmol/L, (1.54±0.33)μg/L, (3.57±0.91)μg/L, 17.5%±8.0%, (8.2±1.3)uIU/L, (21.2±2.6)uIU/L before taking oral metformin and (6.6±1.1)mmol/L,(10.2±2.8)mmol/L, (3.52±1.34)μg/L, (7.68± 1.94)μg/L, 5.4%±2.1%, (9.6±3.9)uIU/L, (30.3±3.1)uIU/L after taking oral metformin, respectively, with statistically significant differences between before and after taking oral metformin (F=1.245, 3.224, 3.127, 2.064, 3.672, 2.074, 1.137, P<0.05). Remission rate of diabetes and excess weight loss (EWL) in patients after treatment were 14.6%, 80%±15% in the group A and 11.1%, 60%±10% in the group B, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in body mass, BMI and EWL after treatment between the 2 groups (t=1.973, 2.326, 2.347, P<0.05), and no statistically significant difference in remission rate of diabetes between the 2 groups (x2=0.477, P>0.05). (3) Influencing factors analysis of remission rate of diabetes in patients undergoing LRYGB: the results of univariate analysis showed that BMI, diabetes duration and LDL were factors affecting remission rate of diabetes in patients undergoing LRYGB, with statistically significant differences (x2=11.267, 9.519, 5.567, P<0.05). The results of multivariate analysis showed that diabetes duration< 10 years was an independent factor affecting good remission rate of diabetes in patients undergoing LRYGB, with statistically significant differences [OR=2.202, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.418-3.420, P<0.05]. (4) Influencing factors analysis of remission rate of diabetes in patients taking oral metformin: the results of univariate analysis showed that diabetes duration, GHb and LDL were factors affecting remission rate of diabetes in patients taking oral metformin, with statistically significant differences (x2=6.306, 7.758, 4.652, P<0.05). The results of multivariate analysis showed that GHb <15.0% was an independent factor affecting good remission rate of diabetes in patients taking oral metformin, with statistically significant differences (OR=3.167, 95%CI: 1.586-6.325, P<0.05).
    Conclusions:LRYGB and oral metformin in the treatment of obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are safe and effective, showing an equivalent remission rate of diabetes, and LRYGB had an advantage of weight loss. Diabetes duration <10 years and GHb <15.0% are respectively independent factors affecting good remission rate of diabetes in patients undergoing LRYGB and taking oral metformin.

     

/

返回文章
返回