术前伴发疾病对腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术后腹部并发症的影响

Impact of preoperative comorbidities on abdominal complications after laparoscopeassisted total gastrectomy for gastric cancer

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨术前伴发疾病对腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术(LATG)术后腹部并发症的影响。
    方法:采用回顾性病例对照研究方法。收集2008年1月至2015年12月福建医科大学附属协和医院收治的 1 657例行LATG胃癌患者的临床资料。术后175例患者发生腹部并发症,其中78例无术前伴发疾病, 97例有术前伴发疾病(疾病种类为1种52例、2种30例、≥3种15例)。分析方法和观察指标:(1)行LATG胃癌患者术后发生腹部并发症的危险因素分析。(2)行LATG胃癌患者术后发生腹部并发症的风险评估:以(1)中独立影响因素为因变量,建立列线图,计算一致性指数。(3)不同术前伴发疾病种类患者行LATG术后腹部并发症发生情况比较。(4)有术前伴发疾病行LATG胃癌患者术后发生腹部并发症的多因素分析。(5)随访情况。采用门诊和电话方式进行随访,了解患者术后生存情况。随访时间截至2016年 5月。单因素分析和计数资料比较采用x2检验,多因素分析采用Logistic回归模型。采用KaplanMeier法计算生存率。
    结果:(1)行LATG胃癌患者术后发生腹部并发症的危险因素分析:单因素分析结果显示:年龄、BMI、术前伴发疾病种类、手术时间、术中估计出血量是影响行LATG胃癌患者术后发生腹部并发症的相关因素(x2=4.487,16.602,10.361,4.567,7.482,P<0.05)。多因素分析结果显示: BMI、术前伴发疾病种类、术中估计出血量是影响行LATG胃癌患者术后发生腹部并发症的独立因素(OR=1.966,1.204,1.423,95%可信区间:1.355~2.851,1.014~1.431,1.013~1.999,P<0.05)。(2)行LATG胃癌患者术后发生腹部并发症的风险评估:以BMI、术前伴发疾病种类、术中估计出血量为因变量,建立预测行LATG胃癌患者术后发生腹部并发症风险的列线图;其一致性指数为0.703。(3)不同术前伴发疾病种类患者行LATG术后腹部并发症发生情况比较:术前伴发疾病种类为0种、1种、2种、≥3种患者行LATG术后发生腹腔感染例数分别为21、8、13、3例,发生吻合口漏例数分别为13、10、9、5例,发生腹腔出血例数分别为6、3、6、2例,不同术前伴发疾病种类患者上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(x2=10.677,10.436,9.245,P<0.05)。(4)有术前伴发疾病行LATG胃癌患者术后发生腹部并发症的多因素分析:BMI≥ 25 kg/m2、术中估计出血量>82 mL是影响有术前伴发疾病行LATG胃癌患者术后发生腹部并发症的独立危险因素(OR=2.104,1.771,95%可信区间:1.307~3.387,1.146~2.738,P<0.05)。(5)随访情况:1 657例患者中,1 568例获得术后随访,其中有术前伴发疾病行LATG术后发生腹部并发症的97例患者均获得随访。随访时间为4~99个月,中位随访时间为47个月。随访期间,患者5年生存率为58.1%,其中97例有术前伴发疾病行LATG术后发生腹部并发症的患者5年生存率为57.4%。
    结论:术前伴发疾病是影响行LATG胃癌患者术后发生腹部并发症的独立因素。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To investigate the impact of preoperative comorbidities on the abdominal complications after laparoscopeassisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for gastric cancer.
    Methods:The retrospective casecontrol study was conducted. The clinical data of 1 657 gastric cancer patients who underwent LATG at the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital between January 2008 and December 2015 were collected. There were 175 patients with postoperative abdominal complications, including 78 without preoperative comorbidities and 97 with preoperative comorbidities (52 with 1 comorbidity, 30 with 2 comorbidities and 15 with more than 3 comorbidities). Analysis method and observation indicators: (1) risk factors analysis of abdominal complications after LATG; (2) risk assessment of abdominal complications after LATG: independent influencing factors of risk factors analysis were expressed as dependent variables, alignment diagram was built and then consistency index was calculated; (3) comparisons of abdominal complications among the patients with different kinds of comorbidities after LATG; (4) multivariate analysis of abdominal complications in patients with comorbidities after LATG; (5) followup situations. Followup using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect postoperative survival of patients up to May 2016. The univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were respectively done using the chisquare test and Logistic regression model. The survival rate was calculated by the KaplanMeier method.
    Results:(1) Risk factors analysis of abdominal complications after LATG: results of univariate analysis showed that age, body mass index (BMI), number of preoperative comorbidities, operation time and estimated volume of intraoperative blood loss were related factors affecting abdominal complications of patients after LATG (x2=4.487, 16.602, 10.361, 4.567, 7.482, P<0.05). Results of multivariate analysis showed that BMI, number of preoperative comorbidities and estimated volume of intraoperative blood loss were independent factors affecting abdominal complications of patients after LATG [OR=1.966, 1.204, 1.423, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.355-2.851, 1.014-1.431, 1.013-1.999, P<0.05]. (2) Risk assessment of abdominal complications after LATG: BMI, number of preoperative comorbidities and estimated volume of intraoperative blood loss were expressed as dependent variables, and the alignment diagram on risk prediction of abdominal complications after LATG was built, with a consistency index of 0.703. (3) Comparisons of abdominal complications among the patients with different kinds of comorbidities after LATG: numbers of patients without comorbidity, with 1 comorbidity, 2 comorbidities and ≥3 comorbidities were detected in 21, 8, 13, 3 patients with intraabdominal infection and 13, 10, 9, 5 patients with anastomotic leakage and 6, 3, 6, 2 patients with intraabdominal bleeding, respectively, with statistically significant differences (x2=10.677, 10.436, 9.245, P<0.05). (4) Multivariate analysis of abdominal complications in patients with comorbidities after LATG: BMI≥ 25 kg/m2 and estimated volume of intraoperative blood loss >82 mL were independent risk factors affecting abdominal complications of patients with preoperative comorbidities after LATG (OR=2.104, 1.771 ,95%CI: 1.307-3.387, 1.146-2.738, P<0.05). (5) Followup situations: of 1 657 patients, 1 568 were followed up for 4-99 months, with a median time of 47 months. Ninetyseven patients with preoperative comorbidities undergoing LATG had postoperative abdominal complications and were followed up. During followup, 5year survival rate of patients was 58.1%, and 5year survival rate of 97 patients with preoperative comorbidities undergoing LATG and with postoperative abdominal complications was 57.4%.
    Conclusion:Preoperative comorbidities are independent factors affecting abdominal complications of patients after LATG.

     

/

返回文章
返回