腹股沟疝日间手术在年龄≥70岁患者中的可行性探讨

Clinical feasibility of ambulatory surgery for inguinal hernia in 70 years of age or older patients

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨腹股沟疝日间手术在年龄≥70岁患者中的可行性。
    方法:采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2015年1月至2016年5月四川大学华西医院收治的675例行腹股沟疝日间手术患者及同时期464例行腹股沟疝住院手术患者(年龄≥70岁)的临床资料。675例日间手术患者中,594例年龄< 70岁的患者设为日间<70岁组,81例年龄≥70岁的患者设为日间≥70岁组;464例年龄≥70岁的住院手术患者设为住院≥70岁组。观察指标:(1)
    日间手术患者疗效:①麻醉方式、手术方法和手术时间。②延迟出院例数和非计划再入院例数。③术后并发症情况,包括切口感染与裂开、阴囊水肿、尿潴留、慢性疼痛和补片感染。(2)住院手术患者疗效:①麻醉方式、手术方法及手术时间。②术后并发症情况(同日间手术)。③术后住院时间。(3)随访情况。所有患者出院后第1、2、3天由专人对患者进行电话随访。术后 2周、3、6、12个月定期对患者进行门诊和电话随访。了解患者生存和疝复发及再入院情况。随访时间截至2016年7月。正态分布的计量资料以±s表示,组间比较采用t检验;计数资料比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。
    结果:(1)日间手术患者疗效:①麻醉方式、手术方法和手术时间情况:日间<70岁组和日间≥70岁组患者均在局部麻醉下完成腹膜前间隙无张力修补术。日间<70岁组患者手术时间为 (29±11)min,日间≥70岁组患者手术时间为(28±10)min,两组患者比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.378, P>0.05)。②延迟出院例数和非计划再入院例数情况:日间<70岁组患者中有2例延迟出院,1例非计划再入院。日间≥70岁组无延迟出院及非计划再入院患者,两组患者比较,差异均无统计学意义(χ2=0.601,0.137,P>0.05)。③术后并发症:日间<70岁组患者术后出现切口感染与裂开、阴囊水肿、尿潴留及慢性疼痛例数分别为4、2、1、3例,日间≥70岁组患者分别为1、0、0、1例,两组患者上述指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者均无补片感染出现。(2)住院手术患者疗效:①麻醉方式、手术方法和手术时间情况:住院≥70岁组患者均在局部麻醉下完成腹膜前间隙无张力修补术,手术时间为(29±10)min,与日间≥70岁组患者比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.806,P>0.05)。②术后并发症:住院≥70岁组患者术后出现切口感染与裂开、阴囊水肿、尿潴留及慢性疼痛例数分别为3、1、1、2例,上述指标分别与日间≥70岁组患者比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),无补片感染患者。③术后住院时间:住院≥70岁组患者中,住院时间≤1 d 439例,>1 d 25例。(3)随访情况:675例行日间手术患者中625例获得随访,中位随访时间为9个月(2~18个月)。日间<70岁组患者中1例发生疝复发,经再次手术治疗后治愈。日间≥70岁组患者未出现疝复发。住院≥70岁组患者中432例获得随访,中位随访时间为9个月(2~18个月);1例患者发生疝复发,经再次手术治疗后治愈。
    结论:腹股沟疝日间手术可在大部分年龄≥70岁患者中安全开展。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To explore the clinical feasibility of ambulatory surgery for inguinal hernia in 70 years of age or older patients.
    Methods:The retrospective cohort study was adopted. The clinical data of 675 patients undergoing ambulatory surgery for inguinal hernia and 464 patients (age≥70 years) undergoing inpatient surgery for inguinal hernia who were admitted to the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2015 to May 2016 were collected. Of 675 patients undergoing ambulatory surgery, 594 patients with age<70 years and 81 with age≥70 years were respectively allocated into the under 70 years group and 70 years or older group. Four hundred sixtyfour patients undergoing inpatient surgery with age≥70 years were allocated into the inpatient surgery group. Observation indicators included: (1) efficacies of patients undergoing ambulatory surgery: ① type of anesthesia, surgical procedures and operation time, ② cases with delayed discharge and cases with unplanned readmission, ③postoperative complications, including wound infection and dehiscence, edema of scrotum, urinary retention, chronic pain and patch infection. (2) Efficacies of patients with inpatient surgery: ① type of anesthesia, surgical procedures and operation time, ② postoperative complications, including wound infection and dehiscence, edema of scrotum, urinary retention, chronic pain and patch infection, ③ duration of postoperative hospital stay. (3) Followup. Patients were regularly followed up using telephone interview at postoperative day 1, 2, 3, and using outpatient examination and telephone interview at postoperative week 2 and month 3, 6, 12 up to July 2016. Followup included the survival of patients, recurrence of hernia and number of readmission. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as ±s and comparison between groups was evaluated with the t test. Comparison of count data were analyzed using the chisquare or Fisher exact probability.
    Results:(1)Efficacies of patients undergoing ambulatory surgery: ① type of anesthesia, surgical procedures and operation time: patients in the under 70 years group and 70 years or older group underwent tensionfree repair under local anesthesia. The operation time in the under 70 years group and 70 years or older group was respectively (29±11)minutes and (28±10)minutes, with no statistically significant difference between 2 groups (t=0.378, P>0.05). ② The cases with delayed discharge and with unplanned readmission: there were 2 patients with delayed discharge and 1 with unplanned readmission in the under 70 years group and no case in the 70 years older group, with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (χ2=0.601, 0.137, P> 0.05). ③ The postoperative complications: wound infection and dehiscence, edema of scrotum, urinary retention and chronic pain were detected in 4, 2, 1, 3 patients in the under 70 years group and 1, 0, 0, 1 patients in the 70 years or older group, respectively, showing no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P> 0.05). No patch infection occured. (2) Efficacies of patients undergoing inpatient surgery: ① type of anesthesia, surgical procedures and operation time: patients in the inpatient surgery group underwent tensionfree repair under local anesthesia and operation time was (29±10)minutes. There was no statistically significant difference in operation time between the inpatient surgery group and 70 years or older group (t=0.806, P> 0.05). ② The wound infection and dehiscence, edema of scrotum, urinary retention and chronic pain in the inpatient surgery group were respectively detected in 3, 1, 1, 2 patients, showing no statistically significant difference between the inpatient surgery group and 70 years or older group (P>0.05 ). No patch infection occured. ③ Duration of postoperative hospital stay was less than 1 day in 439 patients and more than 1 day in 25 patients in the inpatient surgery group, respectively. (3) Followup: 625 of 675 patients undergoing ambulatory surgery were followed up for a median time of 9 months (range, 2-18 months). One patient in the under 70 years group was complicated with recurrence of hernia and then was cured by reoperation. There was no recurrence of hernia in the 70 years or older group. Of 464 patients in the inpatient surgery group, 432 were followed up for a median time of 9 months (range, 2-18 months), and 1 patient with recurrence of hernia was cured by reoperation.
    Conclusion:Ambulatory surgery for inguinal hernia is feasible in 70 years or older patients.

     

/

返回文章
返回