3D腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的临床疗效

Clinical efficacy of threedimensional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨3D腹腔镜在胰十二指肠切除术中的临床应用价值,比较3D腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术的临床疗效。
    方法:采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2014年7月至2016年3月华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院收治的349例行胰十二指肠切除术患者的临床病理资料。146例患者行3D腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术设为3D腹腔镜组,203例行开腹胰十二指肠切除术设为开腹组。观察指标:(1)手术情况:手术时间、术中出血量、术中输血患者例数、淋巴结清扫数目、切缘情况、血管切除联合重建情况。(2)术后情况:胃管拔出时间、ICU入住时间、住院时间。(3)并发症情况:胰瘘、胃排空障碍、腹腔感染或脓肿、胆汁漏、出血、肺部感染或切口感染。(4)随访情况。采用电话方式进行随访,随访内容为患者无瘤生存率。随访时间截至2016年6月。正态分布的计量资料以±s表示,组间比较采用t检验。计数资料比较采用χ2检验。
    结果:(1)手术情况:两组患者均顺利完成胰十二指肠切除术。3D腹腔镜组与开腹组患者手术时间分别为(334±175)min和(320±91)min,术中出血量分别为(254±107)mL和(290± 101)mL,术中输血患者例数分别为29例和35例,淋巴结清扫数目分别为(13±8)枚和(14±9)枚,切缘阳性分别为1例和5例,两组上述指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=0975,1383, χ2=0390,t=12155, 〖KG*4〗χ2=1589,P>005)。3D腹腔镜组与开腹组患者术中联合血管切除重建分别为0和14例,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=10490,P<005)。(2)术后情况:3D腹腔镜组与开腹组患者术后胃管拔出时间分别为(29±19)d和(51±17)d,ICU入住时间分别为(69±21)d和(74±12)d,住院时间分别为(129±72)d和(198±71)d,两组上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=11350,2814, 8903,P<005)。(3)并发症情况:146例3D腹腔镜组患者中,40例发生术后并发症,并发症发生率为2740%(40/146),其中胰瘘29例(A级胰瘘20例、B级和C级胰瘘9例),均经保守治疗后好转;胃排空障碍13例,经胃肠减压,加强胃动力治疗后治愈;术后出血5例,3例经保守治疗好转,2例行再次手术见胰头后方小静脉出血予以术中止血后好转。1例患者因全身炎症反应综合征发生死亡。部分患者合并多种术后并发症。 203例开腹组患者中,60例发生术后并发症,并发症发生率为2956%(60/203),其中胰瘘39例(A级胰瘘31例、B级和C级胰瘘8例);胃排空障碍25例;腹腔感染15例;全身炎症反应综合征13例;上述并发症均经保守治疗后好转;术后出血8例,4例经保守治疗好转,4例经输血及介入治疗无效后行再次手术探查止血痊愈。2例患者因心肺并发症死亡。部分患者合并多种术后并发症。两组患者术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=10490,P>005)。(4)随访情况:3D腹腔镜组患者6个月无瘤生存率为9041%(132/146),开腹组为8522%(173/203),两组比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.076,P> 0.05)。
    结论:与开腹手术比较,3D腹腔镜行胰十二指肠切除术,可提供更真实的视觉效果,实现精细化操作,能取得良好的近期疗效。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To investigate the application value of threedimensional (3D) laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) and compare the clinical outcomes between 3DLPD and open pancreaticoduo denectomy (OPD).
    Methods:The retrospective cohort study was adopted. The clinicopathological data of 349 〖HQK〗patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at the Affiliated Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology between July 2014 and March 2016 were collected. Of 349 patients, 146 undergoing 3DLPD were allocated into the 3D group and 203 undergoing OPD were allocated into the OPD group. Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations: operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, cases of blood transfusion, number of lymph node dissected, resection margin and vascular resection and reconstruction, (2) postoperative situations: time of gastric tube removal, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, duration of hospital stay, (3) complications: pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, intraabdominal infection or abscess, bile leakage, hemorrhage, pulmonary infection or wound infection, (4) followup. All the patients were followed up by telephone interview to detect the tumorfree survival rate up to June 2016. Measurement data with normal distribution were presented as ±s and comparison between groups was analyzed using the t test. Count data were analyzed using the chisquare test.
    Results:(1) Surgical situations: all the patients underwent successful pancreaticoduodenectomy. Operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, cases of blood transfusion, number of lymph node dissected and positive resection margin were (334±175)minutes, (254±107)mL, 29, 13±8, 1 in the 3D group and(320±91)minutes, (290±101)mL, 35, 14±9, 5 in the OPD group, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (t=0.975, 1.383, χ2= 0.390, t=12.155, χ2=1.589, P>0.05). Vascular resection and reconstruction were respectively applied to 0 patient in the 3D group and 14 patients in the OPD group, with a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (χ2=10.490, P<0.05). (2) Postoperative situations: time of gastric tube removal, duration of ICU stay and duration of hospital stay were (2.9±1.9)days, (6.9±2.1)days, (12.9±7.2)days in the 3D group and (5.1±1.7)days, (7.4±1.2)days, (19.8±7.1)days in the OPD group, respectively, with statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (t=11.350, 2.814, 8.903, P<0.05). (3) Complications: of 146 patients in the 3D group, 40 had postoperative complications with incidence of complications of 27.40% (40/146). Twentynine patients with pancreatic fistula (20 in grade A, 9 in grade B and C) were improved by conservative treatment. Thirteen patients with delayed gastric emptying were cured by gastrointestinal decompression and enhancing gastric motility. Of 5 patients with postoperative hemorrhage, 3 were improved by conservative treatment, and 2 were improved by small vein hemostasis behind the head of pancreas. One patient died of systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Partial patients were combined with multiple complications. Of 203 patients in the OPD group, 60 had postoperative complications with incidence of complications of 29.56% (60/203), including 39 patients with pancreatic fistula (31 in grade A, 8 in grade B and C), 25 with delayed gastric emptying, 15 with intraabdominal infection and 13 with systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and they were improved by conservative treatment. Of 8 patients with postoperative hemorrhage, 4 were improved by conservative treatment, and 4 were cured by hemostatic therapy after ineffectual blood transfusion and interventional treatment. Two patients died of cardiopulmonary complication. Partial patients were combined with multiple complications.There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complication between the 2 groups (χ2=10.490, P>0.05). (4) Followup: all the patients were followed up at postoperative month 6. Tumorfree survival rate was 90.41%(132/146) in the 3D group and 85.22%(173/203) in the OPD group, with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (χ2=2.076, P>0.05).
    Conclusion:Compared with OPD, 3DLPD can provide the more realistic visual effects and refinement of surgical procedures, with a good shortterm outcome.

     

/

返回文章
返回