3D与2D腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术的疗效分析

Effect analysis of threedimensional and twodimensional laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨3D与2D腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术的临床疗效。
    方法:采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2014年3月至2015年11月郑州大学人民医院收治的83例行腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术患者的临床资料。其中2014年3-12月采用2D腹腔镜行结直肠癌根治术患者42例,设为2D腹腔镜组;2015年 1-11月采用3D腹腔镜行结直肠癌根治术患者41例,设为3D腹腔镜组。术者严格按照结直肠癌根治术标准行淋巴结清扫,遵循无瘤原则。观察指标:(1)手术情况:手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数目。(2)术后恢复情况:术后胃肠功能恢复时间、术后并发症、术后住院时间、住院费用。(3)术后病理学情况:结直肠标本长度、肿瘤距下切缘距离。(4)随访情况。采用门诊及电话方式进行随访,了解患者术后生存及肿瘤转移、复发情况。随访时间截至2016年3月。正态分布的计量资料以±s表示,组间比较采用t检验。计数资料比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。
    结果:(1)手术情况:两组患者均顺利完成腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术,无中转开腹,无围术期死亡患者。2D腹腔镜组和3D腹腔镜组结直肠癌患者手术时间分别为(171±18)min和(125±13)min,术中出血量分别为(112±18)mL和(101±16)mL,淋巴结清扫数目分别为(140±14)枚和(146±09)枚,两组患者上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=-13091, -2962,-3623,P<0.05)。(2)术后恢复情况:2D腹腔镜组和3D腹腔镜组结直肠癌患者术后胃肠功能恢复时间分别为(30±06)d和(30±06)d,两组患者比较,差异无统计学意义(t=3423,P>0.05)。2D腹腔镜组患者术后并发症发生率为71%(3/42),分别为吻合口瘘1例、腹腔出血1例、腹腔感染1例;3D腹腔镜组患者并发症发生率为49%(2/41),分别为吻合口瘘1例、肠麻痹1例,两组患者并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。发生并发症患者均经对症处理后好转。2D腹腔镜组和3D腹腔镜组结直肠癌患者术后住院时间分别为(100±08)d和(100±06)d,住院费用分别为(70±14)万元和(73±15)万元,两组患者上述指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=15716,0941,P>005)。(3)术后病理学情况:2D腹腔镜组和3D腹腔镜组结直肠癌患者结直肠标本长度分别为(18±7)cm和(20±8)cm,肿瘤距下切缘距离分别为(47±06)cm和(49±07)cm,两组上述指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=0742,1401,P>005)。(4)随访情况:83例患者中,82例获得术后随访。随访时间为5~24个月,中位随访时间为12个月。随访期间,无患者因肿瘤死亡,无穿刺孔复发、转移。2D腹腔镜组和3D腹腔镜组患者发生腹腔内复发分别为3例和2例,吻合口复发分别为2例和1例,远处转移均为1例,两组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。
    结论与2D腹腔镜比较,3D腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术安全可行,近期疗效较好,能有效减少术中出血,淋巴结清扫更彻底。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To explore the clinical effect of threedimensional (3D)and twodimensional (2D) laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer.
    Methods:The retrospective cohort study was adopted. The clinical data of 83 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer at the People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University from March 2014 to November 2015 were collected. Fortytwo patients undergoing 2D laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer between March 2014 and December 2014 were allocated into the 2D group and 41 patients undergoing 3D laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer between January 2015 and November 2015 were allocated into the 3D group. All the patients in the 2 groups underwent 2D or 3D laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer based on the principles of lymph node dissection and tumorfree survival. Observation indicators included: (1) surgical situations: operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph node dissected, (2) postoperative recovery: recovery time of gastrointestinal function, postoperative complications, duration of postoperative hospital stay, hospital expenses, (3) postoperative pathological situations: length of colorectal specimens, distance from tumor to distal incision margin, (4) followup. All the patients were followed up to detect postoperative survival, tumor metastasis and recurrence using outpatient examination and telephone interview up to March 2016. Measurement data with normal distribution were presented as ±s and comparison between groups was analyzed using the t test. Count data were analyzed using chisquare test or Fisher exact probability.
    Results:(1) Surgical situations: all the patients underwent successful laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer, without conversion to open surgery and perioperative death. Operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss and number of lymph node dissected were (171±18) minutes, (112±18)mL, 140 ±14 in the 2D group and (125±13) minutes, (101±16)mL, 146±09 in the 3D group, respectively, with statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (t= -13091,-2962,-3623, P<005). (2) Postoperative recovery: recovery time of gastrointestinal function was (30±06)days in the 2D group and (30±06)days in the 3D group, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (t=3423, P>005). Incidence of postoperative complications in the 2D and 3D groups was 71%(3/42) and 49%(2/41), respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P>005). One, 1, 1 patients in the 2D group were respectively complicated with anastomotic fistula, intraabdominal hemorrhage and intraabdominal infection, 1 and 1 patients in the 3D group were respectively complicated with anastomotic fistula and intestinal paralysis, and they were improved by symptomatic treatment. Duration of postoperative hospital stay and hospital expenses was (100±08)days, (70±14)×104 yuan in the 2D group and (100±06)days, (73±15)×104 yuan in the 3D group, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (t=15716, 0941, P>005). (3) Postoperative pathological situations: length of colorectal specimens and distance from tumor to distal incision margin were (18±7)cm, (47±06)cm in the 2D group and (20±8)cm, (49±07)cm in the 3D group, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (t=0742, 1401, P>005). (4) Followup: of 83 patients, 82 were followed up for 5-24 months with a median time of 12 months. During the followup, there was no occurrence of tumorrelated death and recurrence and metastasis of sites of puncture. Intraabdominal tumor recurrence, recurrence of anastomotic tumor and tumor distant metastasis were detected in 3, 2, 1 patients in the 2D group and 2, 1, 1 patients in the 3D group, with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P>005).
    Conclusion:Compared with 2D laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer, 3D laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer is safe and feasible, and it can also reduce intraoperative blood loss and increase the rate of lymph node dissected, with a good shortterm outcome.

     

/

返回文章
返回