头侧中间入路与传统中间入路腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的疗效分析

Effect analysis of cephalo medial to lateral and traditional medial to lateral approaches for laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨头侧中间入路与传统中间入路腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的临床疗效。
    方法: 采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2015年6-10月上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院收治的82例直肠癌患者的临床资料。 30例患者采用头侧中间入路,设为头侧中间入路组;52例患者采用传统中间入路,设为传统中间入路组。头侧中间入路组从肠系膜下动脉(IMA)头侧的腹主动脉表面腹膜处打开进入左结肠后间隙。观察指标:(1)手术情况:手术时间、打开头侧左结肠后间隙时间、清扫IMA周围淋巴结时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数目、第253组淋巴结清扫数目、肿瘤下切缘距离。(2)术后情况:术后并发症、术后住院时间。(3)随访情况:患者术后生存,肿瘤复发、转移情况。采用门诊或电话方式进行随访,随访时间截至2016年4月。正态分布的计量资料以±s表示,组间比较采用t检验。计数资料比较采用X2检验。
    结果:(1)手术情况:82例患者均顺利完成腹腔镜直肠癌根治术,无中转开腹,围术期无死亡患者。头侧中间入路组打开头侧左结肠后间隙时间为(8±6)min。头侧中间入路组和传统中间入路组手术时间分别为(107± 24)min和(102±15)min,清扫IMA周围淋巴结时间分别为(9±6)min和(15±4)min,术中出血量分别为(91±27)mL和(94±26)mL,淋巴结清扫数目分别为(18.1±7.0)枚和(16.2±5.7)枚,第253组淋巴结清扫数目分别为(3.5±2.2)枚和(1.6±0.7)枚,肿瘤下切缘距离分别为(2.5±0.9)cm和(2.6±1.8)cm。两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数目、肿瘤下切缘距离比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=1.079,-0.455,1.368,-0.150,P>0.05);清扫IMA周围淋巴结时间、第253组淋巴结清扫数目比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=-4.264,-4.268,P<0.05)。头侧中间入路组中1例ⅢC期患者第253组淋巴结病理学检查结果示肿瘤学阳性,占同组12例Ⅲ期患者的1/12。(2)术后情况:头侧中间入路组和传统中间入路组术后发生并发症例数分别为5例和9例,两组均有患者同时合并多种并发症,肠梗阻分别为2例和3例,吻合口漏分别为1例和4例,吻合口出血分别为1例和0,切口感染均为1例,尿路感染分别为1例和2例,所有并发症经对症保守治疗后好转;术后住院时间分别为(10±3)d和(11±6)d。两组患者术后并发症和术后住院时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(χ2=0.941,t=-0.697,P>0.05)。(3)随访情况:82例患者均获得术后随访。随访时间为6~10个月,中位随访时间为8个月。随访期间,无患者肿瘤复发、转移,无肿瘤相关死亡。
    结论:与传统中间入路腹腔镜直肠癌根治术比较,头侧中间入路腹腔镜直肠癌根治术同样安全有效,并不延长总手术时间,其可能在第253组淋巴结清扫方面更具优势。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To investigate clinical effect of the cephalomedial to lateral and traditional medialtolateral approaches for laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer.
    Methods:The retrospective cohort study was adopted. The clinical data of 82 patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer at the Ruijin Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine between June 2015 and October 2015 were collected. Thirty patients undergoing cephalomedial to lateral approach and 52 patients undergoing traditional medialtolateral approach were respectively allocated into the CML group and ML group. Cephalomedial to lateral approach procedures included that peritoneum at surface of the abdominal aorta located at the cephalic inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) was excised and then opening the left Toldt space. Observation indexes: (1) operation situations: operation time, time to open the left Toldt space, time of lymph node dissected around IMA, volume of intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph node dissected, number of No.253 lymph node dissected, distance to distal resection margin, (2) postoperative situations: postoperative complications, duration of postoperative hospital stay, (3) followup situations: postoperative survival, tumor recurrence and metastasis. Patients were followed up by outpatient examination and telephone interview up to April 2016. Measurement data with normal distribution were presented as ±s and comparison between groups was analyzed using the t test. Count data were analyzed using the chisquare test.
    Results:(1) Operation situations: 82 patients underwent successful laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer, without conversion to open surgery and perioperative death. Time to open the left Toldt space was (8± 6)minutes in the CML group. Operation time, time of lymph node dissected around IMA, volume of intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph node dissected, number of No.253 lymph node dissected and distance to distal resection margin were (107±24)minutes, (9±6)minutes, (91±27)mL, 18.1±7.0, 3.5±2.2, (2.5±0.9)cm in the CML group and (102±15)minutes, (15±4)minutes, (94±26)mL, 16.2±5.7, 1.6±0.7, (2.6±1.8)cm in the ML group, respectively, with no statistically significant difference in operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph node dissected and distance to distal resection margin between the 2 groups (t=1.079,-0.455, 1.368,-0.150, P>0.05) and with statistically significant differences in time of lymph node dissected around IMA and number of No.253 lymph node dissected between the 2 groups (t= -4.264,-4.268, P<0.05). Pathological examination showed that No.253 lymph node of 1 patient with stage ⅢC in the CML group was positive, and positive rate of tumor in the CML group was 1/12. (2) Postoperative situations: 5 and 9 patients in the CML group and ML group had respectively postoperative complications, some of them were combined with multiple complications. Intestinal obstruction, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, incision infection, urinary tract infection and duration of hospital stay were 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, (10±3)days in the CML group and 3, 4, 0, 1, 2, (11±6)days in the ML group, respectively, showing no statistically significant difference in postoperative complications and duration of hospital stay between the 2 groups (χ2=0.941, t=-0.697, P>0.05). (3) Followup situations: 82 patients were followed up for 6-10 months with a median time of 8 months, without the occurrence of tumor recurrence and metastasis and tumorrelated death.
    Conclusion:Compared with traditional medialtolateral approach, cephalomedial to lateral approach is safe and feasible for laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer, and it cannot extend the operation time, with an advantage of No.253 lymph node dissection.

     

/

返回文章
返回