再改良的Sugiura术治疗门静脉高压症的临床疗效

Clinical efficacy of re-modified Sugiura procedure for portal hypertension

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨再改良的Sugiura术治疗门静脉高压症的临床疗效。
    方法:采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2006年6月至2014年10月宜昌市第二人民医院收治的119例门静脉高压症患者的临床资料。72例采用贲门周围血管离断术治疗的患者设为Hassab术组,47例采用再改良的Sugiura术治疗的患者设为RM Sugiura术组。两组患者均先切除脾脏。Hassab术组采用传统的贲门周围血管离断术,RM Sugiura术组对改良Sugiura术作以下改进:(1)斜形横断贲门。(2)选择性贲门周围血管离断,保留食管旁静脉。(3)带蒂大网膜覆盖吻合口前壁并固定于后腹壁。观察指标:(1)术中及术后情况:手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、术后住院时间。(2)术后并发症发生情况:胸腔积液、围术期再出血、吞咽困难、门静脉血栓形成和胃动力障碍。(3)随访情况。采用电话和门诊方式进行随访,主要通过胃镜观察术后6个月、18个月食管静脉曲张程度分级情况。随访时间截至2016年2月。正态分布的计量资料以±s表示,组间比较采用t检验,计数资料采用x2检验,等级资料采用Wilcoxon秩和检验。
    结果:(1)术中及术后情况:全组患者手术成功。Hassab术组和RM Sugiura术组手术时间分别为(201±27)min和(255± 32)min,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=9.67,P<0.05)。Hassab术组和RM Sugiura术组术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、术后住院时间分别为(380±86)mL、(2.7±0.7)d、(14.2±2.4)d和(401±72)mL、(3.0±1.7)d、(15.1±2.7)d,两组上述指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=1.35,1.26,1.86,P>0.05)。(2)术后并发症发生情况:术后第10天出现吞咽困难情况Hassab术组和RM Sugiura术组分别为3、10例,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=0.86,P<0.05)。术后第20天出现吞咽困难情况Hassab术组和RM Sugiura术组分别为1、4例,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.03,P>0.05)。Hassab术组和RM Sugiura术组术后出现胸腔积液、围术期再出血、门静脉血栓形成、胃动力障碍分别为23、6、10、8例和20、1、6、6例,两组上述指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(χ2=1.39,1.02,0.03,0.08,P>0.05)。(3)随访情况:两组患者分别于术后6个月和18个月复查胃镜了解断流术后食管静脉曲张情况。术后6个月Hassab术组静脉曲张G0、GⅠ、 GⅡ、GⅢ分别为0、7、56、9例,RM Sugiura术组为35、12、0、0例,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=-9.64,P<0.05)。术后18个月Hassab术组静脉曲张G0、GⅠ、GⅡ、GⅢ分别为0、0、48、24例,RM Sugiura术组为24、20、3、0例,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=-9.28,P<0.05)。
    结论:再改良的 Sugiura术治疗门静脉高压症的彻底性优于Hassab术,有利于控制再出血,改善患者近远期预后。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of remodified Sugiura procedure for the treatment of portal hypertension.
    Methods:The retrospective cohort study was adopted. The clinical data of 119 patients with portal hypertension who were admitted to Second People′s Hospital of Yichang from June 2006 to October 2014 were collected. Seventytwo patients who underwent pericardial devascularization were allocated into the Hassab group, and the other 47 patients who underwent the remodified Sugiura procedure were allocated into the RM Sugiura group. All the patients firstly underwent splenectomy. The patients of the Hassab group received the classical surgery of pericardial devascularization, and the operation in the RM Sugiura group was improved on the modified Sugiura procedure in several aspects: (1) the cardia was transected obliquely. (2) Paraesophageal vessels were preserved by selective pericardial devascularization. (3) The pedicled omentum covered the anterior anastomosis and was sutured to the posterior abdominal wall. Observed indices included (1) intraoperative and postoperative situations: operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative anal exhaust time and duration of postoperative hospital stay. (2) Postoperative complications: postoperative pleural effusion, perioperative digestive tract rebleeding, difficult swallowing, portal vein thrombosis and gastric dynamic dysfunction. (3) Situation of followup. The followup was performed by telephone interview and outpatient examination to observe the grading of the esophageal varices at postoperative month 6 and 18 using gastroscope till February 2016. Measurement data with normal distribution were presented as ±s, and comparison between groups was done by the t test. Count data were analyzed by the chisquare test. Ranked data were analyzed by Wilcoxon rank test.
    Results:(1) Intraoperative and postoperative situations: operation time of the Hassab group and the RM Sugiura group was (201±27)minutes and (255±32)minutes, respectively, with a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (t=9.67, P<0.05). The volume of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative anal exhaust time and duration of postoperative hospital stay were (380±86)mL, (2.7±0.7)days, (14.2±2.4)days in the Hassab group and (401±72)mL, (3.0±1.7)days, (15.1±2.7)days in the RM Sugiura group, respectively, showing no statistically significant difference (t= 1.35, 1.26, 1.86, P>0.05). (2) Postoperative complications: dysphagia was detected in 3 patients of the Hassab group and in 10 patients of the RM Sugiura group at the postoperative day 10, with a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (χ2=0.86, P<0.05). However, dysphagia was detected in 1 patient of the Hassab group and in 4 patients of the RM Sugiura group at the postoperative day 20, showing no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (χ2=2.03, P> 0.05). The number of postoperative pleural effusion, perioperative digestive tract rebleeding, portal vein thrombosis and gastric dynamic dysfunction of the Hassab group and the RM Sugiura group were 23, 6, 10, 8 cases and 20, 1, 6, 6 cases, respectively, showing no statistically significant difference (χ2=1.39, 1.02, 0.03, 0.08, P>0.05). (3) Situation of followup: all the patients were reexamined using gastroscope to observe the grading of esophageal varices. There were 0, 7, 56, 9 patients of G0, GⅠ, GⅡ, GⅢ grading of varices in the Hassab group and 35, 12, 0, 0 patients in the RM Sugiura group at postoperative month 6, showing a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (Z=-9.64, P<0.05). There were 0, 0, 48, 24 patients of G0, GⅠ, GⅡ, GⅢ grading of varices in the Hassab group and 24, 20, 3, 0 patients in the RM Sugiura group at postoperative month 18, showing a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (Z=-9.28, P<0.05).
    Conclusion:The remodified Sugiura procedure is more effective than the Hassab operation in curing portal hypertension, and it could also reduce the rate of rehemorrhage and improve the shortterm and longterm prognosis.

     

/

返回文章
返回