Bolondi再分期模型对中期肝癌患者肝切除术后生存的预测作用

Survival prediction of the Bolondi substaging model for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨巴塞罗那中期肝细胞癌(肝癌)Bolondi再分期模型对肝切除术后患者总体生存的预测作用。
    方法:采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2008年2月至2010年1月第二军医大学东方肝胆外科医院收治的343例中期肝癌患者的临床病理资料。患者入院后均进行详细的病史采集和体格检查,完善相关实验室和影像学检查。根据评估结果行肝切除术。研究方法:(1)按Bolondi再分期模型将患者分为B1组、B2组和B3/4组,并分析各组患者的预后。(2)分析影响B1组和B2组患者预后的因素。(3)以微血管侵犯(MVI)情况,将B1组和B2组患者分为4组(M1组:B1组MVI阴性,M2组:B1组MVI阳性,M3组:B2组MVI阴性,M4组:B2组MVI阳性)进行分层分析。观察指标:(1)患者基本临床病理特征。(2)B1组、B2组和B3/4组患者生存情况。(3)影响B1组和B2组患者预后的危险因素分析。(4) B1组和B2组患者MVI分层分析。所有患者在术后采用电话或门诊进行随访。术后2年内每3个月检查1次腹部超声,肝功能和血清AFP。2年后每6个月复查1次。随访截止时间为2014年2月。连续变量资料以M(Qn)表示,分类变量以例数及百分比方式表示。多组间连续性变量比较采用方差分析或KruskalWallis检验,分类变量采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法,若为单向有序分类变量,则选择KruskalWallis检验。KaplanMeier法绘制生存曲线,生存情况的单因素分析采用Logrank检验,多因素分析采用COX比例风险模型。
    结果:(1)患者基本临床病理特征:343例肝癌患者中,B1、B2、B3/4组患者分别为143例、183例、17例(B3期12,B4期5例)。3组患者在年龄、腹腔积液、TBil、Alb、ALT、PT、PLT、AFP、肝切除范围、手术切缘侵犯、肿瘤直径、肿瘤数目、EdmondsonSteiner分级、Upto7评分、Upto7标准、ChildPugh评分方面比较,差异有统计学意义(F=3.377,NA,11.245,32.616,6.884,11.564, 33.100,12.902,NA,NA,239.089,10.357,χ2=8.906,F=251.508,χ2=343.000,106.790,P<0.05)。(2)患者生存情况:343例患者获得随访,随访时间为2.8~70.8个月,中位随访时间为38.7个月。B1、B2、B3/4组患者术后1年生存率分别为85.8%、72.8%、52.9%,3年生存率分别为63.2%、47.5%、16.8%,5年生存率分别为45.5%、30.4%、8.4%,中位生存时间分别为55.1个月、35.1个月、12.2个月。3组患者生存率比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=22.800,P<0.05)。(3)危险因素分析:单因素分析结果表明:腹腔积液、Alb、Hb、AFP、食管胃底静脉曲张、手术切缘侵犯、肿瘤直径、MVI和EdmondsonSteiner分级是影响B1组和B2组中期肝癌患者肝切除术后预后的相关危险因素(HR=2.04,2.46,2.50,1.78,1.55,3.54,1.71,1.76,1.69,95%可信区间:1.13~3.69,1.20~5.02,1.51~4.15,1.29~2.45,1.06~2.25,1.65~7.61,1.23~2.38,1.23~2.51,1.08~2.64,P<0.05)。多因素分析结果表明: Alb<35 g/L、Hb低于正常下限、肿瘤侵犯手术切缘、肿瘤直径> 5 cm以及MVI阳性是影响B1组和B2组的中期肝癌患者肝切除术后总体生存的独立危险因素(HR=2.82,2.16,2.93,1.48,1.53,95%可信区间:1.37~5.80,1.27~3.69,1.33~6.44,1.05~2.09,1.06~2.22,P<0.05)。(4)B1组和B2组326例患者中,M1组61例,M2组82例,M3组57例,M4组126例。M2组与M3组的术后生存表现极似,将其合并为M2/3组,M1、M2/3、M4组患者术后1年生存率分别为90.0%、83.2%、67.7%,3年生存率分别为68.8%、59.9%、41.6%,5年生存率分别为52.7%、42.1%、23.6%,中位生存时间分别为69.0个月、49.2个月、24.9个月,3组患者生存率比较,差异有统计学意义 (χ2=20.200,P<0.05)。
    结论:Bolondi再分期模型对中期肝癌患者肝切除术后生存具有良好的预测作用。B1期和B2期肝癌患者肝切除术后可获得较好的远期生存。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To investigate the overall survival prediction of the Bolondi substaging model for patients in intermediatestage of Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) after hepatectomy.
    MethodsThe retrospective cohort study was adopted. The clinical data of 343 patients with intermediatestage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who were admitted to the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital of the Second Military Medical University between February 2008 and January 2010 were collected. All the patients received the detailed medical history collection, physical examination, laboratory and imaging examinations after admission, and then hepatectomy was performed according to the results of above examinations. Research methods: (1) patients were allocated into the B1, B2 and B3/4 groups based on the Bolondi′s substaging model, and the prognostic analyses among groups were conducted. (2) The related factors affecting the prognosis of patients in the B1 and B2 groups were analyzed. (3) The patients in the B1 and B2 groups were allocated into the 4 groups [patients of B1 group with negative microvascular invasion (MVI) were divided in the M1 group, patients of B1 group with positive MVI in the M2 group, patients of B2 group with negative MVI in the M3 group and patients of B2 group with positive MVI in the M4 group] according to the situations of MVI, and stratified analysis was conducted. Observation indicators: basic clinical and pathological features and survival of patients in the B1, B2 and B3/4 groups were observed. Risk factors analysis affecting the prognosis of patients and stratified analysis of MVI in the B1 and B2 groups were conducted. All the patients were followed up by outpatient examination and telephone interview up to February 2014, and the abdominal ultrasound, liver function and serum alphafetoprotein (AFP) tests was performed once every 3 months within 2 years postoperatively and once every 6 months after 2 years postoperatively. The continuous variables and categorical variables were respectively represented as M(Qn) and percentage. The comparisons of continuous variables and categorical variables among groups were analyzed by ANOVA or KruskalWallis test and chisquare test or Fisher exact probability, respectively, and oneway ordinal categorical variables were analyzed by the KruskalWallis test. The survival curve was drawn using the KaplanMeier method. The univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were done using the Logrank test and COX regression model.
    Results: (1) The basic clinical pathological features: of 343 patients with HCC, 143, 183 and 17 patients (12 in the B3 substaging and 5 in the B4 substaging) were respectively allocated into the B1, B2 and B3/4 groups. There were statistically significant differences in the age, peritoneal effusion, total bilirubin (TBil), albumin (Alb), alanine transaminase (ALT), prothrombin time (PT), platelet (PLT), alphafetoprotein (AFP), extent of liver resection, surgical margin ivasion, tumor diameter, number of tumor, EdmondsonSteiner grade, Upto7 score, Upto7 standard and Childpugh score among the 3 groups (F=3.377, NA, 11.245, 32.616, 6.884, 11.564, 33.100, 12.902, NA, NA, 239.089, 10.357, χ2=8.906, F=251.508, χ2=343.000, 106.790, P<0.05). (2) Survival of patients: all the patients were followed up for 2.8-70.8 months with a median time of 38.7 months. The 1, 3, 5year survival rates and median survival time in the B1, B2 and B3/4 groups were 85.8%, 72.8%, 52.9% and 63.2%, 47.5%, 16.8% and 45.5%, 30.4%, 8.4% and 55.1 months, 35.1 months, 12.2 months, respectively, showing a statistically significant difference (χ2=22.800, P<0.05). (3) Risk factors analysis: the results of univariate analysis showed that the peritoneal effusion, Alb, Hb, AFP, esophagogastric varices, surgical margin invasion, tumor diameter, MVI and EdmondsonSteiner grade were related risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with HCC after hepatectomy [HR=2.04, 2.46, 2.50, 1.78, 1.55, 3.54, 1.71, 1.76, 1.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-3.69, 1.20-5.02, 1.51-4.15, 1.29-2.45, 1.06-2.25, 1.65-7.61, 1.23-2.38, 1.23-2.51, 1.08-2.64, P<0.05]. The results of multivariate analysis showed that the Alb<35 g/L, Alb<low limit of normal, tumor invading to surgical margin, tumor diameter > 5 cm and positive MVI were independent risk factors affecting the overall survival of patients with HCC after hepatectomy (HR=2.82, 2.16, 2.93, 1.48, 1.53, 95%CI: 1.37-5.80, 1.27-3.69, 1.33-6.44, 1.05-2.09, 1.06-2.22, P<0.05). (4) There were 61, 82, 57 and 126 patients in the M1, M2, M3 and M4 groups, and M2 and M3 groups were merged into the M2/3 group because of being similar survival situations of patients. The 1, 3, 5year survival rates and median survival time in the M1, M2/3, and M4 groups were 90.0%, 83.2%, 67.7% and 68.8%, 59.9%, 41.6% and 52.7%, 42.1%, 23.6% and 69.0 months, 49.2 months, 24.9 months, respectively, with a statistically significant difference among the 3 groups(χ2=20.200, P<0.05).
    Conclusions: The Bolondi substaging model produces an optimal survival prediction for patients in intermediate stage of BCLC after hepatectomy. The patients in the B1 and B2 substaging have better longterm survival outcomes after hepatectomy.

     

/

返回文章
返回