肠型与胰胆管型壶腹部浸润性腺癌的影像学特征

Imaging features of intestinal type and pancreaticobiliary type invasive adenocarcinoma of the ampullary region

  • 摘要: 目的:分析肠型与胰胆管型壶腹部浸润性腺癌(IAAR)的CT、MRI影像学检查特征,探讨其诊断及鉴别诊断的要点。
    方法采用回顾性横断面研究方法。收集2013年9月至2015年8月兰州大学第二医院(20例)和宁波大学医学院附属医院(13例)收治的33例IAAR患者的临床病理资料。患者行CT或MRI平扫及增强扫描检查。(1)观察肿瘤的大小、形态、生长方式、边界、内部结构、密度和(或)信号、强化模式和(或)程度、胆管和(或)胰管改变、侵犯和转移情况。(2)比较肠型IAAR和胰胆管型IAAR临床和影像学特征。(3)完善术前相关检查后行手术治疗,术后行病理学检查和免疫组织化学染色检测。正态分布的计量资料以±s表示,组间比较采用独立样本t检验;计数资料比较采用χ2检验。
    结果:(1) 33例IAAR患者,19例行CT平扫,其中17例同时行增强扫描;14例患者行MRI平扫(9例包括DWI序列),其中12例同时行增强扫描。33例患者肿瘤的最大直径为(2.8±1.4)cm。14例患者肿瘤呈圆形或卵圆形,19例形态不规则。24例患者肿瘤呈腔内型,6例呈腔外型,3例呈混合型。17例患者肿瘤边界清晰,16例边界模糊。5例患者瘤体内出现坏死和(或)囊变,33例均未见出血或钙化。18例患者肿瘤密度和信号均匀,15例不均匀。29例行CT或MRI增强扫描患者中强化模式:14例肿瘤呈均匀强化,15例呈不均匀强化;强化程度:15例肿瘤呈轻度强化,14例呈中等强化,没有明显强化患者。9例患者肿瘤在DWI上呈略高或高信号。30例患者继发胆管扩张(轻度3例、中度6例、重度21例),3例胆管未见改变。26例患者继发胰管扩张,7例胰管未见改变。16例患者肿瘤侵犯胰腺组织;7例患者发生淋巴结转移。(2)33例IAAR患者中,肠型IAAR 19例(男8例、女11例),胰胆管型IAAR 14例(男11例、女3例)。两种病理学类型患者性别比例比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.388,P<0.05)。肠型IAAR和胰胆管型IAAR影像学特征表现中:肿瘤生长方式腔内型、腔外型、混合型分别为17、0、2例和7、6、1例;肿瘤边界清晰和模糊分别为13、6例和4、10例;肿瘤密度和(或)信号均匀和不均匀分别为14、5例和4、10例;侵犯胰腺有和无分别为6、13例和10、4例;两种病理学类型患者上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=9.971,5.125,6.617, 5.125,P<0.05)。(3)33例IAAR患者均经手术治疗,并经病理学检查和免疫组织化学染色检查对肿瘤进行综合诊断及分型。
    结论:肠型IAAR和胰胆管型IAAR的CT、MRI检查表现具有一定特征性,患者的性别、肿瘤的生长方式、边界、密度和(或)信号、侵犯胰腺对鉴别诊断具有参考价值。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To analyze the computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of intestinaltype and pancreaticobiliarytype invasive adenocarcinomas of the ampullary region (IAARs) and investigate the value of the differential diagnosis.
    Methods:The retrospective crosssectional study was adopted. The clinicopathological data of 33 patients with IAAR who were admitted to the Lanzhou University Second Hospital (20 patients) and Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University (13 patients) between September 2013 and August 2015 were collected. The patients underwent plain and enhanced scans of CT and MRI. (1) Observation indictors included tumor size, shape, growth pattern, boundary, internal structure, density and-/or signal, style and-/or degree of contrast enhancement, changes of bile and-/or pancreatic duct, invasion and metastasis. (2) The clinical and imaging features of intestinaltype and pancreaticobiliarytype IAARs were compared. (3) Operation was performed after preoperative examinations, and patients received the postoperative pathological examination and immunohistochemistry. Measurement data with normal distribution were presented as ±s. Comparison between groups was evaluated with an independent sample t test, and count data were analyzed using the chisquare test.
    Results:(1) Of 33 patients with IAAR, 19 received plain scan of CT, including 17 receiving simultaneous enhanced scan of CT. Fourteen patients [9 receiving diffussionweighted imaging (DWI) sequence of MRI] received plain scan of MRI, including 12 receiving simultaneous enhanced scan of MRI. The maximum diameter of IAAR in 33 patients was (2.8±1.4)cm. Fourteen tumors were roundlike or oval shape and 19 tumors were irregular shape. The intracavity type, extracavity type and mixed type of tumors were detected in 24, 6 and 3 patients, respectively. There were clear boundary of tumors in 17 patients and fuzzy boundary of tumors in 16 patients. Tumors of 5 patients had appeared necrotic and-/or cystic, no hemorrhage or calcification was found in tumors of 33 patients. Density and signal of tumors were homogeneous in 18 patients and inhomogeneous in 15 patients. Of 29 patients receiving enhanced scan of CT or MRI, homogeneous enhancement and inhomogeneous enhancement were respectively detected in 14 and 15 patients, and mild enhancement, moderate enhancement and no enhancement were respectively detected in 15, 14 and 0 patients. Tumors of 9 patients in DWI showed slightly high or high signal. Thirty patients had secondary bile duct dilatation (3 with mild dilatation, 6 with moderate dilatation and 21 with severe dilatation), and 3 patients had no changes of bile duct. Twentysix patients had secondary pancreatic duct dilatation and 7 had no changes of pancreatic duct. Sixteen patients had tumor invasion to pancreatic tissues and 7 had lymph node metastases. (2) Of 33 patients with IAAR, 19 had intestinaltype IAAR (8 males and 11 females) and 14 had pancreaticobiliarytype IAAR (11 males and 3 females). There was statistically significant difference in the gender between the 2 types of IAAR (χ2=4.388, P<0.05). The intracavity type, extracavity type and mixed type of tumors, clear boundary and fuzzy boundary of tumors, homogeneous and inhomogeneous density and-/or signal of tumors, with and without tumor invasion to pancreatic tissues were respectively detected in 17, 0, 2, 13, 6, 14, 5, 6, 13 patients with intestinaltype IAAR and 7, 6, 1, 4, 10, 4, 10, 10, 4 patients with pancreaticobiliarytype IAAR, with statistically significant differences between the 2 types of IAAR (χ2=9.971, 5.125, 6.617, 5.125, P<0.05). (3) All the patients underwent surgery and received comprehensive diagnosis and tumor classification after pathological examination and immunohistochemistry.
    Conclusion: There are certain characteristics of CT and MRI in intestinaltype and pancreaticobiliarytype IAARs, and gender, tumor growth pattern, boundary, density and-/or signal, tumor invasion to pancreatic tissues have certain reference values for the differential diagnosis of intestinal type and pancreaticobiliary-type IAARs.

     

/

返回文章
返回