加速康复外科在胆道外科手术中的应用价值

Application value of enhanced recovery after surgery in the perioperative period of biliary surgery

  • 摘要: 目的:探究加速康复外科(ERAS)在胆道外科手术围术期中的临床价值。
    方法:采用前瞻性研究方法。选取2011年3月至2015年1月河北省沧州市中心医院收治的800例胆道系统良性疾病患者的临床资料,采用随机数列法将患者分为观察组和对照组,观察组患者采用ERAS围术期处理方案,对照组患者采用传统围术期处理方案。观察指标:(1)应激状态评价:计算两组患者胰岛素抵抗指数(IR)和检测血清C反应蛋白(CRP)水平。(2)炎症因子水平:采用ELISA检测两组患者血清IL-6和TNFα水平。(3)营养状态:检测两组患者血清前白蛋白(PA)水平。(4)术后情况:两组患者术后首次排气时间、术后排便时间、住院时间、治疗费用。(5)术后并发症发生情况。正态分布的计量资料以±s表示,两组比较采用t检验。重复测量数据采用重复测量方差分析。计数资料以率表示,采用χ2检验。
    结果:筛选出符合研究条件的患者800例,观察组和对照组各400例。(1)两组患者应激状态指标比较:观察组和对照组患者术前至术后第7天IR变化分别为3.8±0.8~3.7±0.7、3.9±0.9~3.8±1.0;血清CRP水平变化分别为(18±5)μg/L~(27±8)μg/L、(18±5)μg/L~(38±9)μg/L;两组患者术前至术后第7天IR与血清CRP水平变化趋势比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=12.38,17.85,P<0.05)。(2)两组患者炎症因子水平比较:观察组和对照组患者术前至术后第7天血清IL-6变化分别为(9.3±3.1)ng/L~(12.5± 2.8)ng/L、(8.9±3.3)ng/L~(17.3±6.5)ng/L;血清TNFα变化分别为(10.2±3.5)ng/L~(12.8±3.3)ng/L、 (9.9±2.8)ng/L~(14.3±4.2)ng/L;两组患者术前至术后第7天血清IL-6、TNFα水平变化趋势比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=19.93,15.74,P<0.05)。(3)两组患者营养状态比较:观察组和对照组患者术前至术后第7天PA水平变化分别为(335±53)mg/L~(332±50)mg/L、(330±49)mg/L~(331± 45)mg/L,两组患者术前至术后第7天PA水平变化趋势比较,差异有统计学意义(F=4.46,P<0.05)。(4)两组患者术后情况比较:观察组和对照组患者术后首次排气时间、术后排便时间、住院时间、治疗费用分别为 (30±10)h和(54±8)h、(51±13)h和(70±16)h、(7.7±2.5)d和(15.4±3.1)d、(10.2±2.3)千元和(15.6±4.7)千元,两组患者上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=37.73,18.62,38.67,20.64, P<0.05)。(5)两组患者术后并发症比较:观察组和对照组患者术后并发症发生率分别为15.00% (60/400)和22.50%(90/400),其中切口感染、恶心呕吐、腹部感染、腹腔感染、尿路感染、腹腔出血、胆汁漏分别为23例和30例、15例和20例、8例和13例、5例和10例、4例和7例、3例和5例、2例和5例;两组患者并发症发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.39,P<0.05)。结论:胆道手术围术期应用ERAS有利于患者术后康复,可减轻患者应激状态和炎症反应,缩短住院时间,降低治疗费用,降低术后并发症发生率。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To explore the clinical value of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the perioperative period of biliary surgery.
    Methods:The prospective study was adopted. The clinical data of 800 patients diagnosed as benign biliary tract diseases who were admitted to the Cangzhou′s Central Hospital from March 2011 to January 2015 were collected. Patients were randomly divided into the case and control groups 〖HJ*3〗by random sequence method. The patients of case group received the ERAS management and patients of the control group received traditional perioperative management. (1) Stress state evaluation: the insulin resistance (IR) index and level of serum Creactive protein (CRP) were calculated. (2) Levels of inflammatory cytokines: levels of IL-6 and TNFα in the 2 groups were detected by enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). (3) Nutritional status: level of serum prealbumin (PA) was detected. (4) Postoperative status: time to anal exsufflation, time of defecation, duration of hospital stay and treatment expenses were recorded. (5) Postoperative complications were observed. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as ±s and comparison between groups was analyzed using t test. Repeated measurement data were analyzed by the repeated measures ANOVA. Count data were represented as ratio and analyzed using the chisquare test.
    Results:The 800 patients were screened for eligibility, including 400 in each group. (1) Stress state evaluation: the levels of IR and CRP from preoperation to 7 days after operation were from 3.8±0.8 to 3.7±0.7 and from (18±5)μg/L to (27± 8)μg/L in the case group, from 3.9±0.9 to 3.8±1.0 and from (18±5)μg/L to (38±9)μg/L in the control group, respectively, with statistically significant differences in the changing trends (F=12.38, 17.85, P< 0.05). (2) Comparisons of levels of inflammatory cytokines: levels of IL-6 and TNFα from preoperation to 7 days after operation were from (9.3±3.1)ng/L to (12.5±2.8)ng/L and from (10.2±3.5)ng/L to (12.8±3.3)ng/L in the case group, from (8.9±3.3)ng/L to (17.3±6.5)ng/L and from (9.9±2.8)ng/L to (14.3±4.2)ng/L in the control group, with statistically significant differences in the changing trends (F=19.93, 15.74, P<0.05). (3) Comparison of nutritional status: level of PA from preoperation to 7 days after operation was from (335±53)mg/L to (332±50)mg/L in the case group and from (330±49)mg/L to (331±45)mg/L in the control group, with a statistically significant difference in the changing trends (F=4.46, P<0.05). (4) Comparisons of postoperative status: time to anal exsufflation, time of defecation, duration of hospital stay and treatment expenses were (30±10)hours, (51±13)hours, (7.7±2.5)days, (10.2±2.3)×103 yuan in the case group and (54±8)hours, (70±16)hours, (15.4±3.1)days, (15.6±4.7)×103 yuan in the control group, with statistically significant differences (t=37.73, 18.62, 38.67, 20.64, P<0.05). (5) Comparisons of postoperative complications: incidence of complications was 15.00%(60/400)in the case group and 22.50%(90/400) in the control group, and the numbers of patients with incision infection, nausea and vomiting, abdominal infection, intraabdominal infection, urinary tract infection, introabdominal hemorrhage and bile leakage were 23, 15, 8, 5, 4, 3, 2 in the case group and 30, 20, 13, 10, 7, 5, 5 in the control group, respectively, showing statistically significant differences in the incidence of complications (χ2=7.39, P<0.05).
    Conclusion:ERAS management in the perioperative period of biliary surgery is beneficial to postoperative recovery of patients, and it can also relieve postoperative stress state and inflammatory response, reduce the duration of hospital stay, treatment expenses and incidence of postoperative complications.

     

/

返回文章
返回