肝囊型包虫病的影像学特征与诊断

Imaging features and diagnosis of hepatic cystic echinococcosis

  • 摘要: 目的:总结肝囊型包虫病CT及MRI影像学检查特征,探讨其诊断及鉴别诊断要点。
    方法回顾性分析2011年8月至2014年8月内蒙古医科大学附属医院收治的58例肝囊型包虫病患者的临床资料。患者行CT平扫及增强扫描、MRI平扫及增强扫描。结合文献将肝囊型包虫病分为5型:Ⅰ型:单纯囊肿型,Ⅱ型:多子囊型,Ⅲ型:内囊分离型,Ⅳ型:实变钙化型,Ⅴ型:混合型。对于明确诊断或疑似诊断肝囊型包虫病患者,予手术治疗。采用门诊和电话方式进行随访。术后3个月、6个月、1年各随访1次,以后每年门诊随访1次,5年以上无复发可停止随访。随访内容主要观察肝囊型包虫病复发情况。随访时间截至2015年8月。
    结果:(1)影像学检查情况:58例患者中,54例行CT扫描,21例行MRI扫描。58例患者中,Ⅰ型肝囊型包虫病17例,CT检查结果示边界清晰的低密度囊性病变;MRI检查结果示单个或多个圆形、椭圆形异常信号,T1WI呈低信号,T2WI呈高信号,囊壁T1WI和T2WI均呈低信号,以T2WI显示更清晰。Ⅱ型肝囊型包虫病13例,CT检查结果示母囊内见多个大小不等的子囊,排列呈“蜂窝状”“车轮状”;MRI检查结果示T1WI子囊信号低于母囊,T2WI子囊信号高于母囊;母囊及子囊囊壁均呈低信号。Ⅲ型肝囊型包虫病6例,CT检查结果示病变呈“套囊征”“水蛇征”等,MRI检查结果示病变呈“飘带征”。Ⅳ型肝囊型包虫病13例,CT检查结果示不规则高密度钙化影, 密度不均匀,病变呈“脑回样”或“卷洋葱皮样”改变。Ⅴ型肝囊型包虫病9例,同时存在上述各型中2种或2种以上类型病变。(2)诊断情况:CT检查误诊 4例,其中3例术前诊断为肝囊肿,1例术前诊断为肝转移癌,诊断准确率为92.6%(50/54)。MRI检查误诊2例,术前均诊断为肝囊腺瘤,诊断准确率为90.5%(19/21)。(3)治疗及随访情况:58例患者均行手术治疗,其中40例行肝囊型包虫病内囊摘除术(31例行开腹手术,9例行腹腔镜手术),10例行肝部分切除术,8例行肝囊型包虫病外囊完整剥除术。58例患者中,术后发生残腔积液3例,外囊不闭合2例,胆汁漏1例,引流4~8周后痊愈。50例患者获得术后随访,随访率为86.2%(50/58),随访时间为12.0~48.0个月,中位随访时间为27.1个月。随访期间,1例肝门部囊型包虫病行内囊摘除术患者术后8个月复发,采用CT引导下无水酒精介入治疗后痊愈。其余患者未见复发。
    结论:CT和MRI影像学检查对肝囊型包虫病具有较高的诊断准确率。“蜂窝状”“车轮状”是多子囊型肝囊型包虫病的特征性表现。内囊分离型肝囊型包虫病CT检查特征表现为“套囊征”“水蛇征”,MRI检查表现为“飘带征”。MRI检查增强的边缘环形强化是肝囊型包虫病与肝囊肿的鉴别要点。不规则钙化是肝包虫病与肝肿瘤的鉴别要点。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To summarize the features of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of hepatic cystic echinococcosis, and investigate the key points of identification and diagnosis. 〖HQK〗
    Methods:The clinical data of 58 patients with hepatic cystic echinococcosis who were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University from August 2011 to August 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients received plain and enhanced scan of CT and MRI. Hepatic cystic echinococcosis was divided into the 5 types according to the literatures, including unilocular echinococcasis in type Ⅰ,  multivesicular hydatid cysts in type Ⅱ, anechoic content with detachment of laminated membrane from the 〖HJ〗cyst wall in type Ⅲ, calcification of lesions in type Ⅳ and mixed echinococcosis in type Ⅴ. Patients who were diagnosed as with definite or suspected hepatic cystic echinococcosis underwent surgery. The followup including observing the recurrence of hepatic cystic echinococcosis was performed by outpatient examination and telephone interview at postoperative month 3, 6, 12 for 1 year and then once every year up to August 2015, and was ended if there was no recurrence for more than 5 years.
    Results: (1) The results of CT and MRI examinations: of the 58 patients, 54 received scan of CT and 21 received scan of MRI. Seventeen patients were detected in type I with clearboundary and lowdensity cystic lesions by CT examination; MRI examinations showed there were single or multiple, round or oval abnormal signal including low T1WI signal, high T2WI signal and low T1WI and T2WI signal of cyst wall. Thirteen patients were detected in type Ⅱ, CT examination showed the “daughter” cysts of multiple sizes were found in the “mother” cyst, arranged in “honeycomb” or “wheel” shape; MRI examination showed there were lower T1WI signal in the “daughter” cyst and higher T2WI signal in the “daughter” cyst compared with signal in the “mother” cyst, and low signal in the cyst wall of the “daughter” cyst and “mother” cyst. Six patients were detected in type III with “capsule in capsule” sign and “water snake” sign by CT examination and “ribbon” sign by MRI examination. Thirteen patients were detected in type Ⅳ, CT examination showed there were irregular highdensity calcified shadow with the performances for “return sample” or “sample volume skins” changes. Nine patients in type Ⅴ had more than 2 kinds of lesions. (2) Diagnosis: 4 patients were misdiagnosed by CT examination including 3 with preoperative diagnosis of hepatic cyst and 1 with preoperative diagnosis of metastatic carcinoma of liver, with an accurate rate of diagnosis of 92.6%(50/54). Two patients with preoperative diagnosis of hepatic cystic adenocarcinoma were misdiagnosed by MRI examination, with an accurate rate of diagnosis of 90.5% (19/21). (3) Treatment and followup: 58 patients underwent surgery, including 40 undergoing internal capsule removal with external capsule suturing (31 with open operation and 9 with laparoscopic operation), 10 undergoing partial hepatectomy and 8 undergoing external capsule enucleation. Of 58 patients, 3 were complicated with effusion of residual cavity, 2 with unclosed external capsule, 1 with bile leakage and then was cured after 4-8 week drainage. Fifty patients were followed up for 12.0-48.0 months with a median time of 27.1 months and a followup rate of 86.2%(50/58). During the followup, 1 patient undergoing internal capsule removal had recurrence at postoperative month 8 and was cured by CTguided interventional therapy using absolute alcohol, and other patients had no recurrence.
    Conclusions:There was a higher accuracy in CT and MRI examinations for hepatic cystic echinococcosis. “Honeycomb” and “wheel” shapes are characteristic findings of hepatic cystic echinococcosis in type II. The characteristic performances of CT examination for hepatic cystic echinococcosis in type III are “capsule in capsule ” and “water snake” signs, and characteristic performances of MRI examination is “ribbon” sign. The ringlike enhancement of edge by MRI examination is an essential of identification and diagnosis between hepatic cystic echinococcosis and hepatic cyst, and irregular calcification is a differential point between hepatic echinococcosis and hepatic tumor.

     

/

返回文章
返回