去盆腔神经对大鼠结肠动力与结肠黏膜瞬时受体电位通道A1的影响

Effects of pelvic nerve transection on the colonic motility and the expression of transit receptor potential ankyrin 1 in a rat model

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨去盆腔神经对大鼠结肠动力与结肠黏膜瞬时受体电位通道A1(TRPA1)的影响。
    方法:将96只成年大鼠按随机数字表法分为3组:(1)对照组18只,大鼠不做特殊处理,仅常规饲养。(2)假手术组39只,大鼠开腹后剥离出盆腔神经,缝合切口,关闭腹腔。(3)手术组39只,大鼠开腹后分离出盆腔神经,显微剪剪断,缝合切口,关闭腹腔。通过计算各组大鼠术后第1、3、7天结肠组织和粪便中铬( 51Cr)分布的几何中心(GC)检测结肠传输功能。运用Western blot检测各组大鼠术后第1、3、7天近端及远端结肠黏膜TRPA1的表达。符合正态分布的计量资料以±s表示,多组间比较采用重复测量的方差分析,两两比较采用LSD检验。
    结果:假手术组大鼠 51Cr的GC值术后第1、3、7天分别为5.8±0.9、7.5± 0.5、7.3±0.5,3者比较,差异有统计学意义(F=9.508,P<0.05)。手术组大鼠 51Cr的GC值术后第1、3、 7天分别为4.9±0.4、5.6±0.4、6.4±0.8,3者比较,差异有统计学意义(F=11.689,P<0.05)。假手术组和手术组大鼠 51Cr的GC值术后第1、3天分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.227,7.144,P<0.05);术后7天两组比较,差异无统计学意义(t=2.162,P>0.05)。Western blot检测结果显示:对照组大鼠近端结肠黏膜中 TRPA1相对表达量术后第1、3、7天分别为1.00±0.05、1.00±0.07、1.00±0.06,3者比较,差异无统计学意义(F=0.055,P>0.05)。假手术组大鼠近端结肠黏膜中TRPA1相对表达量术后第1、3、7天分别为0.78±0.09、0.94±0.08、0.95±0.12,3者比较,差异有统计学意义(F=5.651,P<0.05)。手术组大鼠近端结肠黏膜中TRPA1相对表达量术后第1、3、7天分别为0.37±0.12、0.89±0.10、0.92±0.14,3者比较,差异有统计学意义(F=41.005,P<0.05)。对照组、假手术组和手术组大鼠近端结肠黏膜中TRPA1相对表达量术后第1天比较,差异有统计学意义(F=73.497,P<0.05);对照组分别与假手术组和手术组比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=4.224,11.954,P<0.05);手术组和假手术组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=7.730,P<0.05)。对照组、假手术组和手术组大鼠近端结肠黏膜中TRPA1相对表达量术后第3、7天比较,差异均无统计学意义(F=2.087,0.656,P>0.05)。对照组大鼠远端结肠黏膜中TRPA1相对表达量术后第1、3、7天分别为1.00±0.05、1.00±0.07、1.00±0.06,3者比较,差异无统计学意义(F=0.055,P> 0.05)。假手术组大鼠远端结肠黏膜中TRPA1相对表达量术后第1、3、7天分别为0.68±0.11、0.98± 0.12、1.11±0.16,3者比较,差异有统计学意义(F=16.975,P<0.05)。手术组大鼠远端结肠黏膜中 TRPA1相对表达量术后第1、3、7天分别为0.39±0.12、0.78±0.10、1.06±0.13,3者比较,差异有统计学意义(F=50.417,P<0.05)。对照组、假手术组和手术组大鼠远端结肠黏膜中TRPA1相对表达量术后第1、3天比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=58.773,8.680,P<0.05)。术后第1天,对照组分别与假手术组和手术组比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=5.706,10.837,P<0.05);手术组和假手术组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=5.131,P<0.05)。术后第3天,对照组与假手术组比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.166,P>0.05);对照组与手术组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=3.694,P<0.05);假手术组和手术组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=3.528,P< 0.05)。对照组、假手术组和手术组大鼠远端结肠黏膜中TRPA1相对表达量术后第7天比较,差异无统计学意义(F=1.319,P>0.05)。
    结论:去盆腔神经支配后,大鼠结肠动力减弱,远端结肠黏膜中TRPA1表达下调,但随时间推移可逐渐恢复,两者在恢复趋势上存在一致性。

     

    Abstract: thor: Tong Weidong, Email: vdtong@163.com
    【Abstract】Objective:To investigate the effects of pelvic nerve transection on the colonic motility and the expression of transit receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) in the colon mucosa.
    Methods:Ninetysix SpragueDawley 〖HQK〗rats were divided into 3 groups based on a random number table: (1) 18 rats in the control group remained untreated and were fed regularly; (2) 39 rats in the sham operation group received laparotomy, and the pelvic nerves were stripped; (3) 39 rats in the operation group received laparotomy with pelvic nerve transection before abdominal closure. Colonic transit was assessed respectively at postoperative day 1, 3, and 7 by injecting and calculating the geometric center (GC) of the distribution of 51Cr after 3 hours of propagation. The expression of TRPA1 in the colonic mucosa was determined by Western blot at postoperative day 1, 3, 7. Data with normal distribution were expressed by ±s, and were analyzed using the repeated measures ANOVA or LSD test.
    Results The GC values of the distribution of 51Cr in the sham operation group at postoperative day 1, 3, 7 were 5.8±0.9, 7.5±0.5, 7.3±0.5, with a significant difference (F=9.508, P<0.05). The GC values of the distribution of 51Cr in the operation group at postoperative day 1, 3, 7 were 4.9±0.4, 5.6±0.4, 6.4±0.8, with a significant difference (F=11.689, P<0.05). There were significant differences in the GC values of the distribution of 51Cr at postoperative day 1 and 3 between the sham operation group and the operation group (t=2.227, 7.144, P< 0.05), while no significant difference was detected at postoperative day 7 (t= 2.162, P>0.05). The results of Western blot showed that the relative expressions of TRPA1 in the proximal part of the colon at postoperative day 1, 3, 7 were 1.00±0.05, 1.00±0.07, 1.00±0.06 in the control group, with a significant difference (F= 0.055, P>0.05). The relative expressions of TRPA1 in the proximal part of the colon at postoperative day 1, 3, 7 were 0.78±0.09, 0.94±0.08, 0.95±0.12 in the sham operation group, with a significant difference (F= 5.651, P<0.05). The relative expressions of TRPA1 in the proximal part of the colon at postoperative day 1, 3, 7 were 0.37±0.12, 0.89±0.10, 0.92±0.14 in the operation group, with a significant difference (F= 41.005, P<0.05). There was significant difference in the relative expressions of TRPA1 in the proximal part of the colon among the 3 groups at postoperative day 1 (F=73.497, P<0.05), while significant differences were respectively detected between the control group and the sham operation group and the operation group at postoperative day 1 (t=4.224, 11.954, P<0.05), and significant difference between the operation group and the sham operation group was also observed (t=7.730, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the relative expression of TRPA1 in the proximal part of the colon among the 3 groups between day 3 and day 7 (F=2.087, 0.656, P>0.05). The relative expressions of TRPA1 in the distal part of the colon at postoperative day 1, 3, 7 were 1.00±0.05, 1.00±0.07, 1.00±0.06 in the control group, with no significant difference (F= 0.055, P>0.05). The relative expressions of TRPA1 in the distal part of the colon at postoperative day 1, 3, 7 were 0.68±0.11, 0.98±0.12, 1.11±0.16 in the sham operation group, with a significant difference (F= 16.975, P<0.05). The relative expressions of TRPA1 in the distal part of the colon at postoperative day 1, 3, 7 were 0.39±0.12, 0.78±0.10, 1.06±0.13 in the operation group, with a significant difference (F= 50.417, P<0.05). There were significant differences in the relative expression of TRPA1 in the distal part of the colon among the 3 groups between day 1 and day 3 (F=58.773, 8.680, P<0.05), while significant differences were respectively detected between the control group and the sham operation group and the operation group at postoperative day 1 (t=5.706, 10.837, P<0.05), and significant difference was also detected between the operation group and the sham operation group (t=5.131, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the relative expression of TRPA1 in the distal part of the colon between the control group and the sham operation group at postoperative day 3 (t=0.166, P>0.05), while significant differences were respectively detected between the control group and the operation group and between the sham operation group and the operation group at postoperative day 3 (t=3.694, 3.528, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the relative expression of the TRPA1 in the distal part of the colon between the 3 groups at postoperative day 7 (F=1.319, P>0.05).
    Conclusions: Injury to pelvic nerves adversely affects colonic transit and expression of TRPA1 in mucosa. With a compensatory mechanism from the intestinal itself, these alterations in intestinal motility function normalize over time suggesting expression of TRPA1 in mucosa plays a crucial role in the recovery of intestinal motility function.

     

/

返回文章
返回