肝细胞癌大体形态分型的临床意义

Clinical value of morphological classification of hepatocellular carcinoma

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨肝细胞癌(以下简称肝癌)大体形态分型与患者临床病理特征及预后的关系,以及影响肝癌患者预后的相关因素。
    方法:回顾性分析2008年1月至2013年12月南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院收治的119例肝癌患者的临床资料。将手术切除标本沿冠状位切成厚度约1 cm的切片并拍照,记录病理学特点。参照文献,结合临床经验,将肝癌手术切除标本大体形态分为结节型(1型)、结节突起型(2型)、结节融合型(3型)、浸润型(4型)。比较4种类型患者的临床病理因素。采用门诊及电话方式进行随访,随访时间截至2014年4月或患者死亡。正态分布的计量资料以〖AKx-D〗±s表示,多组间比较采用方差分析,两两比较采用LSDt检验;偏态分布数据以M(P25,P75)表示,多组间比较采用KruskalWallis检验,两两比较采用MannWhitney检验。计数资料比较和单因素分析采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。采用KaplanMeier法绘制生存曲线,Logrank检验进行生存分析。采用COX逐步回归模型进行多因素分析。
    结果:119例肝癌患者中,1型占20.17%(24/119),2型占25.21%(30/119),3型占21.85%(26/119),4型占32.77%(39/119)。4种不同大体形态分型的肝癌患者年龄、HBsAg阳性、术前AFP、手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、T分期、微血管侵犯比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=4.499, χ2=2.944,3.516,F=1.028,2.837,2.419, χ2=6.606,12.732,P<0.05)。进一步两两比较:患者术前AFP,4型显著高于3型、2型和1型,差异均有统计学意义(Z=2.183,1.851,2.083,P<0.05)。患者手术时间,4型显著长于3型和1型,差异均有统计学意义(t=1.825,1.758,P<0.05);4型与2型比较,差异无统计学意义(t=1.521,P>0.05)。患者术中出血量,4型显著多于3型、2型和1型,差异均有统计学意义(t=1.769,1.875,2.205,P<0.05)。患者住院时间,4型显著长于2型和1型,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.159,1.975,P<0.05);4型与3型比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.248,P>0.05)。患者微血管侵犯,4型显著多于3型、2型和1型,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=5.905,8.291,4.729,P<0.05)。119例肝癌患者中,116例术后获得随访,随访率为97.48%(116/119),中位随访时间为26个月(4~74月)。119例患者总体中位生存时间为25个月(1~73个月),1、3、5年总体生存率分别为83.2%、70.7%、63.4%;无瘤中位生存时间为14个月(1~70个月),1、3、5年无瘤生存率分别为73.3%、42.7%、11.4%。1型肝癌患者总体中位生存时间为56个月(51~61个月),1、3、5年总体生存率分别为94.1%、82.5%、65.3%,无瘤中位生存时间为48个月(41~54个月),1、3、5年无瘤生存率分别为81.3%、66.7%、58.6%;2型肝癌患者总体中位生存时间为56个月(52~60个月),1、3、5年总体生存率分别为91.6%、82.6%、82.6%,无瘤中位生存时间为46个月(40~51个月),1、3、5年无瘤生存率分别为81.4%、64.1%、64.1%;3型肝癌患者总体中位生存时间为53个月(48~58个月),1、3、5年总体生存率分别为91.6%,84.7%,77.8%,无瘤中位生存时间为42个月(36~48个月),1、3、5年无瘤生存率分别为80.1%、62.3%、50.0%;4型肝癌患者总体中位生存时间为46个月(40~51个月),1、3、5年总体生存率分别为65.7%、51.5%、45.6%,无瘤中位生存时间为29个月(23~34个月),1、3、5年无瘤生存率分别为64.3%、31.6%、22.3%。不同大体形态分型肝癌患者预后(总体生存率和无瘤生存率)比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.971,7.652,P<0.05)。患者预后(总体生存率和无瘤生存率)4型显著差于3型、2型和1型,差异均有统计学意义(总体生存率: χ2=4.823,6.131,5.785,P<0.05;无瘤生存率:χ2=5.184,5.634,9.262,P<0.05)。单因素分析结果显示:术前AFP、T分期、微血管侵犯、肿瘤大体形态分型是影响肝癌患者预后的相关因素(χ2=3.516,6.687,6.165,7.974,P<0.05)。多因素分析结果显示:T3~T4期、微血管侵犯、肿瘤大体形态分型为4型是影响肝癌患者预后的独立危险因素(RR=3.646,2.397,1.617,95%可信区间:1.042~12.713,1.063~5.403,1.119~2.337,P<0.05)。
    结论:肝癌的大体形态分型可能与患者临床病理因素相关,浸润型肝癌患者术前AFP高、术中出血量大、微血管侵犯发生率高,预后差。T3~T4期、微血管侵犯、肿瘤大体形态分型为浸润型是影响肝癌患者预后的独立危险因素。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To investigate the relationship between morphologic classification of hepatocellular carcinoma and clinicopathological features and prognosis in patients, as well as the factors affecting the prognosis of patients.
    Methods:The clinical data of 119 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who received surgical treatment at the Drum Tower Hospital from January 2008 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. The tumors of all the patients were cut into sections with thickness of 1 cm in a coronal plane and were taken pictures for recording pathological features. The sections of tumors were divided into 4 types according to the references and clinical experiences: single nodular type(type 1), single nodular with extranodular growth type (type 2), confluent multinodular type (type 3)and infiltrating type (type 4). The clinicopathological features of patients with 4 types of tumors were compared. Patients were followed up via outpatient examination and telephone interview up to April 2014 or death. Data with normal distribution were presented as  〖AKx-D〗±s. Comparison among groups was evaluated with the repeated measures ANOVA and done by the KruskalWallis method.  Pairwise comparison was analyzed using LSDt test and MannWhitney test. Data with skew distribution were presented as M(P25,P75). Count data and univariate analysis were done using chisquare test or Fisher exact probability. Survival curve was drawn by KaplanMeier method. Survival analysis were done using the Logrank test, and multivariate analysis was done using the COX regression model.
    Results:Of the 119 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, 20.17% patients (24/119) were in type 1, 25.21% patients (30/119) in type 2, 21.85% patients (26/119) in type 3 and 32.77% patients (39/119) in type 4. The age, positive HBsAg, preoperative alpha fetoprotein (AFP), operation time, volume of blood loss, duration of hospital stay, T stage and microvascular invasion in the patients with hepatocellular carcinoma of the 4 types were compared, showing significant differences (F=4.499, χ2=2.944, 3.516, F=1.028, 2.837, 2.419, χ2=6.606, 12.732, P<0.05). The preoperative AFP of the patients in type 4 was significantly higher than that in type 3, type 2 and type 1 (Z=2.183, 1.851, 2.083, P<0.05). The operation time of patients in type 4 was significantly longer than that in type 3 and type 1 (t=1.825, 1.758, P<0.05), and was no significantly different from that in type 2 (t=1.521, P>0.05). The volume of intraoperative blood loss of the patients in type 4 was obviously more than that in type 3, type 2 and type 1(t=1.769, 1.875, 2.205, P<0.05). The duration of hospital stay of patients in type 4 was significantly longer than that in type 2 and type 1 (t=2.159, 1.975, P<0.05), and was no significantly different from that in type 3 (t=0.248, P>0.05). The microvascular invasion of the patients in type 4 was significantly more than that in type 3, type 2 and type 1 (χ2=5.905, 8.291, 4.729, P<0.05). Of the 119 patients, 116 patients were followed up with a followup rate of 97.48% (116/119), and the median time of followup was 26 months (range, 4-74 months). The median overall survival time of 119 patients was 25 months (range, 1-73 months). The 1, 3, 5year overall survival rates were 83.2%, 70.7% and 63.4%, respectively. The tumor free median survival time was 14 months (range, 1-70 months). The 1, 3, 5year tumor free survival rates were 73.3%, 42.7% and 11.4%, respectively. The median overall survival time of 24 patients in type 1 was 56 months (range, 51-61 months), the 1, 3, 5year overall survival rates were 94.1%, 82.5% and 65.3%, respectively,  the tumor free median survival time was 48 months (range, 41-54 months),  and the 1, 3, 5year tumor free survival rates were 81.3%, 66.7% and 58.6%,  respectively. The median overall survival time of 30 patients in type 2 was 56 months (range, 52-60 months), the 1, 3, 5year overall survival rates were 91.6%, 82.6% and 82.6%, respectively, the tumor free median survival time was 46 months (range, 40-51 months),  and the 1, 3, 5year tumor free survival rates were 81.4%, 64.1% and 64.1%, respectively. The median overall survival time of 26 patients in type 3 was 53 months (range, 48-58 months), the 1, 3, 5year overall survival rates were 91.6%,84.7% and 77.8%, respectively, the tumor free median survival time was 42 months (range, 36-48 months),  and the 1, 3, 5year tumor free survival rates were 80.1%, 62.3% and 50.0%, respectively. The median overall survival time of 39 patients in type 4 was 46 months (range, 40-51 months), the 1, 3, 5year overall survival rates were 65.7%, 51.5% and 45.6%, respectively, the tumor free median survival time was 29 months (range, 23-34 months), and the 1, 3, 5year tumor free survival rates were 64.3%, 31.6% and 22.3%, respectively. There was a significant difference between the overall survival rates and the tumor free survival rates in the patients with morphologic classification of hepatocellular carcinoma (χ2=7.971, 7.652, P<0.05). The overall survival rates and tumor free survival rates of the patients in type 4 were significantly different from those in type 3, type 2 and type 1 (overall survival rates: χ2=4.823, 6.131, 5.785, P<0.05; tumor free survival rates: χ2=5.184, 5.634, 9.262, P<0.05). The results of univariate analysis showed that preoperative AFP, T stage, microvascular invasion and morphologic classification of hepatocellular carcinoma were related factors affecting the prognosis of patients (χ2=3.516, 6.687, 6.165, 7.974, P<0.05). The results of multivariate analysis showed that T3-T4 stage ,  microvascular invasion and hepatocellular carcinoma in type 4 were the independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients (RR=3.646, 2.397, 1.617, 95%  confidence interval: 1.042-12.713, 1.063-5.403,  1.119-2.337, P<0.05).
    Conclusions:The morphologic classification of hepatocellular carcinoma may be associated with the clinicopathological factors of patients. The patients with infiltrating hepatocellular carcinoma have the high level of preoperative AFP, much intraoperative blood loss, high incidence of microvascular invasion and poor prognosis. The T3-T4 Stage, microvascular invasion and infiltrating type of morphological classification are the independent risk factors affecting the prognoses of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

     

/

返回文章
返回