腹腔镜根治性手术治疗肥胖直肠癌患者的安全性及近期疗效

Safety and short term efficacy of laparoscopic radical rectal resection for obese patients with rectal cancer

  • 摘要:
    目的  探讨新疆地区肥胖直肠癌患者行腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的安全性、可行性及近期疗效。
    方法  回顾性分析2008年4月至2012年4月新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院收治的205例行根治性手术的肥胖直肠癌患者的临床资料,按手术方式以及体质指数进行分组:腹腔镜组95例(Ⅰ度肥胖60例、Ⅱ度肥胖35例),开腹组110例(Ⅰ度肥胖65例、Ⅱ度肥胖45例)。对比分析腹腔镜组和开腹组患者术中和术后情况及近期生存情况。患者采用邮件和电话等方式进行随访,随访截至2012年6月。计量资料比较采用t检验,计数资料比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。应用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,采用Log-rank检验分析生存情况。
    结果  Ⅰ度肥胖患者中腹腔镜组和开腹组的手术时间分别为(235±25)min和(241±23)min,淋巴结清扫数目分别为(19±6)枚和(19±6)枚,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(t=-1.416,0.100,P>0.05);术中出血量、肛门排气时间、术后住院时间、总并发症发生率分别为(195±77)ml、(1.7±0.6)d、(10.9±2.3)d、21.7%(13/60)和(393±170)ml、(3.8±1.1)d、(15.2±2.6)d、38.5%(25/65),两组比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=-8.229,-12.192,-12.002,χ2=4.159,P<0.05)。Ⅱ度肥胖患者中腹腔镜组和开腹组的手术时间分别为(242±24)min和(250±23)min,淋巴结清扫数目分别为(17±5)枚和(18±7)枚,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(t=-1.556,-0.397,P>0.05);术中出血量、肛门排气时间、术后住院时间、总并发症发生率分别为(253±96)ml、(1.8±0.7)d、(11.2±2.5)d、17.1%(6/35)和(443±180)ml、(4.2±1.2)d、(16.2±2.4)d、37.8%(17/45),两组比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=-5.634,-11.205,-8.824,χ2=4.092,P<0.05)。本组185例患者获得随访,中位随访时间为23个月,腹腔镜组与开腹组患者累积生存率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.203,P>0.05)。
    结论  肥胖直肠癌患者行腹腔镜直肠癌根治术安全可行,能满足肿瘤根治的需要,不影响患者的生存时间。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  To investigate the safety, feasibility and short-term efficacy of laparoscopic radical rectal resection for obese patients with rectal cancer.
    Methods  The clinical data of 205 obese patients with rectal cancer who received radical resection at the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from April 2008 to April 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were divided into 2 groups according to the surgical procedure and body mass index: 95 patients were in the laparoscopic resection (LR) group (60 cases of Ⅰdegree obesity and 35 cases of Ⅱdegree obesity) and 110 patients were in the open resection (OR) group (65 cases of Ⅰdegree obesity and 45 cases of Ⅱ degree obesity). Patients were followed up till June 2012 by mail and phone call. The differences in intra- and postoperative situations and short-term survival rates of the 2 groups were compared using the t test, chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. The survival curve was drawn by Kaplan-Meier method, and the survival was analyzed using the Log-rank test.
    Results  For patients with Ⅰdegree obesity, the mean operation time and number of lymph node dissected were (235±25)minutes and 19±6 in the LR group, and (241±23)minutes and 19±6 in the OR group, with no significant difference between the 2 groups (t=-1.416, 0.100, P>0.05). The volume of blood loss, first flatus, duration of postoperative hospital stay, incidence of complications were (195±77)ml, (1.7±0.6)days, (10.9±2.3)days and 21.7%(13/60) in the LR group, and (393±170)ml, (3.8±1.1)days, (15.2±2.6)days, 38.5%(25/65) in the OR group, with significant differences between the 2 groups (t=-8.229,-12.192,-12.002, χ2=4.159, P<0.05). For patients with Ⅱdegree obesity, the mean operation time and number of lymph node dissected were (242±24)minutes and 17±5 in the LR group, and (250±23)minutes and 18±7 in the OR group, with no significant difference between the 2 groups (t=-1.556,-0.397, P>0.05). The volume of blood loss, first flatus, duration of postoperative hospital stay, incidence of complications were (253±96)ml, (1.8±0.7)days, (11.2±2.5)days and 17.1%(6/35) in the LR group, and (443±180)ml, (4.2±1.2)days, (16.2±2.4)days, 37.8%(17/45) in the OR group, with significant differences between the 2 groups (t=-5.634,-11.205,-8.824, χ2=4.092, P<0.05). One hundred and eighty-five patients were followed up, with a median time of 23 months. There was no significant difference in the accumulative survival rate between the 2 groups 2=0.203, P>0.05).
    Conclusions  Laparoscopic radical rectal resection is safe and feasible for obese patients. It could radically dissect tumors without influencing the survival time.
     

     

/

返回文章
返回