术后辅助化疗对胃癌根治术患者预后的影响(附6 135例报告)

Impact of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on the prognosis of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer (a report of 6 135 cases)

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨术后辅助化疗对胃癌根治术患者预后的影响。
    方法 采用倾向评分匹配及回顾性队列研究方法。收集2007年1月至2019年12月浙江省肿瘤医院收治的6 135例胃癌根治术患者的临床病理资料;男4 376例,女1 759例;年龄为61(19~92)岁。6 135例患者中,3 530例术后未行辅助治疗,设为NAC组;2 605例术后行辅助治疗,设为AC组。观察指标:(1)倾向评分匹配及匹配后患者临床病理特征比较。(2)随访情况。(3)影响患者预后的相关因素分析。(4)不同年龄患者预后情况。计数资料组间比较采用χ²检验。等级资料组间比较采用非参数秩和检验。采用Cox比例风险模型进行单因素和多因素分析。采用Kaplan‑Meier法绘制生存曲线并计算总生存率,Log‑rank检验进行生存分析。倾向评分匹配按1∶1最近邻匹配法匹配,卡钳值为0.02。
    结果 (1)倾向评分匹配及匹配后患者临床病理特征比较:6 135例患者中,3 642例匹配成功,每组各1 821例。倾向评分匹配后,消除年龄、家族史、手术方式、胃切除范围、肿瘤部位、病理学类型、肿瘤分化程度、脉管侵犯、神经侵犯、复发转移、病理学TNM分期、病理学T分期、病理学N分期混杂因素的影响,具有可比性。(2)随访情况:倾向评分匹配后,患者均获得术后随访,随访时间为60(0~180)个月。NAC组和AC组随访期间死亡894例和673例。NAC组和AC组患者术后3年总生存率分别为56.3%和69.5%,5年总生存率分别为46.0%和61.2%。两组患者总生存情况比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ²=74.45,P<0.05)。(3)影响患者预后的相关因素分析:倾向评分匹配后多因素分析结果示性别、年龄(中年比青年)、年龄(老年比青年)、术后辅助化疗、手术方式、胃切除范围(远端胃切除比近端胃切除)、肿瘤部位(≥2处比胃上1/3)、病理学类型、脉管与神经侵犯、复发转移、病理学T分期(T3期比T1期)、病理学T分期(T4期比T1期)、病理学N分期(N1期比N0期)、病理学N分期(N2期比N0期)、病理学N分期(N3期比N0期)均是影响胃癌根治术患者预后的独立因素(风险比=0.88,1.40,2.14,0.63,1.22,0.66,1.28,1.26,1.22,1.22,1.82,2.41,3.30,1.50,2.11,4.10,95%可信区间为0.79~0.99,1.03~1.89,1.59~2.86,0.57~0.69,1.03~1.46,0.50~0.87,1.10~1.50,1.09~1.45,1.09~1.37,1.08~1.38,1.51~2.19,1.51~3.86,2.07~5.27,1.10~2.05,1.51~2.94,2.92~5.75,P<0.05)。(4)不同年龄患者预后情况:倾向评分匹配后,1 091例中年患者中,531例术后行和560例未行辅助治疗患者的3年总生存率分别为81.4%和71.7%、5年总生存率分别为76.2%和65.4%,两类患者比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ²=11.63,P<0.05)。2 313例老年患者中,1 181例术后行和1 132例未行辅助治疗患者的3年总生存率分别为69.5%和56.3%、5年总生存率分别为61.2%和46.0%,两类患者比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ²=64.93,P<0.05)。
    结论 胃癌根治术后行辅助化疗对患者预后有获益,尤其是中老年患者,可以显著提高总生存率。性别、年龄、术后辅助化疗、手术方式、胃切除范围、肿瘤部位、病理学类型、脉管与神经侵犯、复发转移、病理学T分期、病理学N分期均是影响胃癌根治术患者预后的独立因素。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the impact of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on the prognosis of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
    Methods The propensity score matching (PSM) and retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 6 135 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from January 2007 to December 2019 were collected. There were 4 376 males and 1 759 females, aged 61 (range, 19-92) years. Among the 6 135 patients, 3 530 cases who did not receive postoperative adjuvant therapy were assigned to the NAC group, and 2 605 patients who received postoperative adjuvant therapy were assigned to the AC group. Observation indicators: (1) propensity score matching and comparison of clinicopathological characteristics of patients after matching; (2) follow‑up; (3) analysis of prognostic factors of patients; (4) prognosis of patients with different age. Comparison of count data between groups was conducted using the chi‑square test. Comparison of ordinal data was conducted using the non‑parametric rank‑sum test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard model. The Kaplan‑Meier method was used to calculate survival rates and draw survival curves. The Log‑rank test was used for survival analysis. PSM was done by the 1∶1 nearest neighbor matching method, with a caliper of 0.02.
    Results (1) Propensity score matching and comparison of clinicopathological characteristics after matching: among the 6 135 patients, 3 642 cases were successfully matched, with 1 821 cases in each group. After PSM, potential confounding biases including age, family history, surgical approach, extent of gastrectomy, tumor location, pathological type, differentiation degree, vascular invasion, neural invasion, recurrence/metastasis, pathological TNM stage, pathological T stage, and pathological N stage were eliminated, ensuring comparability between the two groups. (2) Follow‑up: after PSM, all patients were followed up postoperatively for 60 (range, 0-180) months. During follow‑up, 894 deaths occurred in the non‑AC group and 673 deaths occurred in the AC group. The 3‑, 5‑year overall survival rates were 56.3% and 46.0% in the non‑AC group, versus 69.5% and 61.2% in the AC group, respectively, showing a significant difference of overall survival between the two groups (χ²=74.45, P<0.05). (3) Analysis of prognostic factors of patients: results of multivariate analysis after PSM showed that gender, age (middle age versus youth), age (old age versus youth), adjuvant chemotherapy, surgical approach, extent of gastrectomy (proximal gastrectomy versus distal gastrectomy), tumor location (≥2 locations versus 1/3 of the upper part of stomach), pathological type, vascular and neural invasion, recurrence and metastasis, pathological T stage (T3 stage versus T1 stage), pathological T stage (T4 stage versus T1 stage), and pathological N stage (N1 stage versus N0 stage), pathological N stage (N2 stage versus N0 stage), pathological N stage (N3 stage versus N0 stage) were independent prognostic factors for patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer (hazard ratio=0.88, 1.40, 2.14, 0.63, 1.22, 0.66, 1.28, 1.26, 1.22, 1.22, 1.82, 2.41, 3.30, 1.50, 2.11, 4.10, 95% confidence interval as 0.79-0.99, 1.03-1.89, 1.59-2.86, 0.57-0.69, 1.03-1.46, 0.50-0.87, 1.10-1.50, 1.09-1.45, 1.09-1.37, 1.08-1.38, 1.51-2.19, 1.51-3.86, 2.07-5.27, 1.10-2.05, 1.51-2.94, 2.92-5.75, P<0.05). (4) Prognosis of patients with different age: after PSM, in 1 091 middle aged patients, the 3‑year overall survival rates were 81.4% for 531 patients with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus 71.7% for 560 patients without postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, the 5‑year overall survival rates were 76.2% versus 65.4%, showing significant differences between them (χ²=11.63, P<0.05). In 2 313 old age patients, the 3‑year overall survival rates were 69.5% for 1 181 pati-ents with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus 56.3% for 1 132 patients without postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, the 5‑year overall survival rates were 61.2% versus 46.0%, showing significant differences between them (χ²=64.93, P<0.05).
    Conclusion Postoperative adjuvant chemo-therapy provides a survival benefit for patients undergoing radical gastrectomy, particularly for middle aged and old age patients, significantly improving overall survival rates. Gender, age, adjuvant chemotherapy, surgical approach, extent of gastrectomy, tumor location, pathological type, vascular and neural invasion, recurrence and metastasis, pathological T stage, and pathological N stage are independent prognostic factors for patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

     

/

返回文章
返回