腹腔镜肝切除术治疗老年孤立性肝细胞癌的临床疗效

Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy for elderly patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨腹腔镜肝切除术治疗老年孤立性肝细胞癌的临床疗效。
    方法 采用倾向评分匹配及回顾性队列研究方法。收集2015年1月至2021年12月陆军军医大学第一附属医院(西南医院)收治的583例孤立性肝细胞癌行腹腔镜肝切除术患者的临床病理资料;男507例,女76例;年龄为49(44,57)岁。583例患者中,475例年龄≤60岁患者设为非老年组,108例年龄≥70岁患者设为老年组。观察指标:(1)倾向评分匹配情况及匹配后两组患者临床病理特征比较。(2)患者围手术期情况。(3)患者生存分析。(4)患者预后的影响因素分析。正态分布的计量资料组间比较采用独立样本t检验。偏态分布的计量资料组间比较采用非参数秩和检验。计数资料组间比较采用χ²检验或Fisher确切概率法。等级资料组间比较采用非参数秩和检验。采用Kaplan‑Meier法计算生存率并绘制生存曲线,Log‑rank检验进行生存分析。单因素和多因素分析采用Cox比例风险回归模型。将单因素分析中P<0.1的变量纳入多因素分析。倾向评分匹配按1∶1最近邻匹配法匹配,卡钳值为0.1。
    结果 (1)倾向评分匹配情况及匹配后两组患者临床病理特征比较:583例患者中,186例匹配成功,非老年组93例,老年组93例。倾向评分匹配后,消除匹配前性别、吲哚菁绿15 min滞留率、肿瘤分化程度混杂偏倚,具有可比性。(2)患者围手术期情况:倾向评分匹配后,非老年组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术中输血、术后住院时间、术后并发症分别为187(145,230)min、200(150,300)mL、8例、9(7,11)d、9例,老年组上述指标分别为197(147,245)min、200(100,300)mL、8例、8(7,11)d、7例,两组比较,差异均无统计学意义(Z=-0.81,0.62,χ²=0.00,Z=0.05,χ²=0.27,P>0.05)。非老年组患者并发症分级为Clavien⁃Dindo 1级5例、2级4例,老年组分别为6、1例,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(χ²=1.91,P>0.05)。(3)患者生存分析:倾向评分匹配后,非老年组和老年组患者随访时间分别为73(66,88)个月和65(57,70)个月。非老年组患者1、3、5年总生存率分别为92.4%、77.8%、65.8%,老年组患者分别为90.2%、75.6%、64.4%,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(χ²=0.10,P>0.05)。非老年组患者1、3、5年无复发生存率分别为78.2%、57.9%、41.0%,老年组患者分别为80.5%、68.5%、59.9%,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(χ²=5.08,P<0.05)。(4)患者预后的影响因素分析:多因素分析结果示甲胎蛋白为20~<400 μg/L、肿瘤最大径≥5.0 cm、肿瘤累及3个或4个肝段是影响孤立性肝细胞癌患者总生存率的独立危险因素(风险比=1.39、1.52、1.78、2.66,95%可信区间为1.01~1.91、1.14~2.03、1.03~3.06、1.21~5.82,P<0.05)。年龄≥70岁是影响孤立性肝细胞癌患者无复发生存率的独立保护因素(风险比=0.55,95%可信区间为0.39~0.76,P<0.05)。肿瘤最大径≥5.0 cm和肿瘤累及4个肝段是影响孤立性肝细胞癌患者无复发生存率的独立危险因素(风险比=1.41、2.56,95%可信区间为1.12~1.78、1.30~5.05,P<0.05)。
    结论 对于经严格评估的老年孤立性肝细胞癌患者,腹腔镜肝切除术可实现与非老年患者相当的远期生存,且无复发生存情况更好。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy for elderly patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Methods The propensity score matching (PSM) and retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 583 patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma at The First Affiliated Hospital (Southwest Hospital) of Army Medical University from January 2015 to December 2021 were collected. There were 507 males and 76 females, aged 49(44,57) years. Among the 583 patients, 475 cases aged ≤60 years were classified into non‑elderly group and 108 cases aged ≥70 years were classified into elderly group. Observation indicators: (1) PSM and comparison of clinico-pathological characteristic of patients between the two groups after matching; (2) perioperative situations of patients; (3) survival analysis; (4) prognostic factor analysis of patients. Comparison of measurement data with normal distribution between groups was conducted using the independent sample t test. Comparison of measurement data with skewed distribution between groups was conducted using the non‑parameter rank sum test. Comparison of count data between groups was conducted using the chi‑square test or Fisher exact probability. Comparison of ordinal data between groups was conducted using the non‑parameter rank sum test. The Kaplan‑Meier method was used to calculate survival rates and plot survival curves, and Log‑rank test was used for survival analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Variables with P<0.1 in univariate analysis were entered into the multivariate analysis. PSM was performed using the 1∶1 optimal full matching method with a caliper value of 0.1.
    Results (1) PSM and comparison of clinicopathological characteristic of patients between the two groups after matching: of the 583 patients, 186 cases were successfully matched, with 93 cases in the non‑elderly group and 93 cases in the elderly group. After PSM, the elimination of gender, indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes, and tumor differentiation grade confounding bias ensured comparability. (2) Peri⁃operative situations of patients: after PSM, the operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, cases with intraoperative transfusion, duration of postoperative hospital stay, cases with postoperative complications were 187(145,230) minutes, 200(150,300) mL, 8, 9(7,11) days, 9 for the non-elderly group, versus 197(147,245) minutes, 200(100, 300) mL, 8, 8(7,11) days, 7 for the elderly group, respectively, showing no significant difference between the two groups (Z=-0.81, 0.62, χ²=0.00, Z=0.05, χ²=0.27, P>0.05). According to the Clavien‑Dindo classification, Grade Ⅰ and Grade Ⅱ complications occurred in 5 and 4 cases in the non‑elderly group, versus 6 and 1 case in the elderly group, with no significant difference between groups (χ²=1.91, P>0.05). (3) Survival analysis: after PSM, patients in the non‑elderly group and in the elderly group were followed up for 73(66,88) months and 65(57,70) months. The 1‑, 3‑, and 5‑year overall survival rates in the non‑elderly group were 92.4%, 77.8%, 65.8%, respectively, versus 90.2%, 75.6%, and 64.4% in the elderly group, with no significant difference between them (χ²=0.10, P>0.05). The 1‑, 3‑, and 5-year recurrence‑free survival rates in the elderly group were 80.5%, 68.5%, and 59.9%, respectively, versus 78.2%, 57.9%, and 41.0% in the non‑elderly group, with a significant difference between them (χ²=5.08, P<0.05). (4) Prognostic factor analysis of patients: multivariate analysis showed that alpha‑fetoprotein as 20 or above and less than 400 μg/L, tumor diameter ≥5.0 cm, tumor involvement of 3 hepatic segments, and tumor involvement of 4 hepatic segments were independent risk factors for overall survival rate of patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (hazard ratio=1.39, 1.52, 1.78, 2.66, 95% confidence interval as 1.01-1.91, 1.14-2.03, 1.03-3.06, 1.21-5.82, P<0.05). Age ≥70 years was an independent protective factor for recurrence‑free survival rate of patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (hazard ratio=0.59, 95% confidence interval as 0.39-0.76, P<0.05). Tumor diameter ≥5.0 cm and tumor involvement of 4 hepatic segments were independent risk factors for recurrence‑free survival rate of patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (hazard ratio=1.41, 2.56, 95% confidence interval as 1.12-1.78, 1.30-5.05, P<0.05).
    Conclusion Laparoscopic liver resection achieves comparable long‑term overall survival but superior recurrence‑free survival in well-selected elderly patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma compared to non‑elderly patients.

     

/

返回文章
返回