肝门部胆管癌扩大根治术的临床应用价值

Clinical application value of extended radical resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨肝门部胆管癌(PHCC)扩大根治术的临床应用价值。
    方法 采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2024年4—12月南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院收治的91例PHCC患者的临床病理资料;男62例,女29例;年龄为65(41~80)岁。91例患者中,61例行PHCC常规根治术,设为常规根治术组;30例行PHCC扩大根治术,设为扩大根治术组。观察指标:(1)手术情况。(2)术后情况。(3)随访情况。(4)PHCC根治术患者术后生存的影响因素分析。正态分布的计量资料组间比较采用独立样本t检验。偏态分布的计量资料组间比较采用Mann‑Whitney U检验。计数资料组间比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。等级资料组间比较采用Mann‑Whitney U检验。采用 Kaplan‑Meier法计算生存率并绘制生存曲线,生存率比较采用Log‑rank检验。采用Cox比例风险模型进行单因素分析。将单因素分析中P<0.05的变量及临床相关指标纳入Cox比例风险模型进行多因素分析。采用多因素Logistic回归模型校正组间不均衡的临床病理因素,以评估手术方式与术后并发症的独立关联。
    结果 (1)手术情况:两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、肝门阻断、肝三区切除、肝动脉切除重建、门静脉切除重建、联合胰十二指肠切除、胆管成型比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=-2.95,Z=-2.03,χ2=4.79、39.47、17.08、7.22、17.08、4.04,P<0.05)。(2)术后情况:两组患者腹腔感染、术后严重并发症、术后住院时间比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=11.34、6.11、Z=-3.11,P<0.05)。两组患者胰瘘比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。以腹腔感染、术后严重并发症为因变量,将手术方式(扩大根治术比常规根治术)、术前肝内门静脉支栓塞、门静脉侵犯、肝动脉侵犯、TNM分期、T分期作为自变量,纳入二元Logistic回归模型进行多因素校正分析,结果显示:扩大根治术是发生腹腔感染、术后严重并发症的独立危险因素(风险比=7.55、4.20,95%可信区间为2.05~27.81、1.26~13.88,P<0.05)。(3)随访情况:91例患者中,87例获得随访,随访时间为44(5~125)个月。87例患者5年生存率为51.8%,中位生存时间为66(5~125)个月。57例常规根治术组患者5年生存率为52.1%,中位生存时间为66(6~124)个月,30例扩大根治术组患者5年生存率为50.8%,中位生存时间为69(5~125)个月。两组患者生存情况比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.77,P>0.05)。(4)PHCC根治术患者术后生存的影响因素分析:多因素分析结果示脉管侵犯是PHCC根治术患者术后生存的独立影响因素(风险比=2.52,95%可信区间为1.16~5.42,P<0.05)。
    结论 与PHCC常规根治术相比,扩大根治术的手术时间和术后住院时间更长,术中出血量更多,腹腔感染、胰瘘及术后严重并发症风险更高,两者术后院内死亡和5年生存情况比较,差异无统计学意义。脉管侵犯是PHCC根治术患者术后生存的独立影响因素。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the clinical application value of extended radical resec-tion for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC).
    Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 91 patients with PHCC who were admitted to Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School from April to December 2024 were collected. There were 62 males and 29 females, aged 65(range, 41-80) years. Among the 91 patients, 61 cases undergoing conventional radical resection for PHCC were allocated into conventional resection group and 30 cases undergoing extended radical resection were allocated into extended resection group. Observation indicators: (1) surgical outcomes; (2) postoperative situations; (3) follow‑up; (4) influencing factors analysis of postoperative survival of PHCC patients under-going radical resection. Comparison of measurement data with normal distribution between groups was conducted using the independent sample t test. Comparison of measurement data with skewed distribution between groups was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test. Comparison of count data between groups was conducted the chi‑square test or Fisher exact probability. Comparison of ordinal data between groups was conducted using the Mann‑Whitney U test. The Kaplan‑Meier method was used to calculate survival rates and plot survival curves, and survival rates were compared using the Log‑rank test. Univariate analysis was conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model. Variables with P<0.05 in univariate analysis and clinically relevant indicators were included in Cox proportional hazards model for multivariate analysis. A multivariate Logistic regression model was used to adjust for unbalanced clinicopathological factors to evaluate the independent association between surgical procedures and postoperative complications.
    Results (1) Surgical outcomes: there were significant differences between the two groups in operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, hilar occlusion, trisectionectomy, hepatic artery resection and reconstruction, portal vein resection and reconstruction, combined pancreaticoduodenectomy, and bile duct plasty (t=-2.95, Z=-2.03, χ2=4.79, 39.47, 17.08, 7.22, 17.08, 4.04, P<0.05). (2) Postoperative situations: there were significant differences between the two groups in intra‑abdominal infection, severe postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay (χ2=11.34, 6.11, Z=-3.11, P<0.05). The difference in pancreatic fistula was also significant between the two groups (P<0.05). Multivariable-adjusted binary Logistic regression analysis was performed using intra‑abdominal infection and severe postoperative complications as dependent variables, and surgical approach (extended radical resection versus standard radical resection), preoperative intrahepatic portal vein branch embolization, portal vein invasion, hepatic artery invasion, TNM stage, and T stage as independent variables. The results showed that extended radical resection was an independent risk factor for intra-abdominal infection and severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio=7.55, 4.20, 95% confidence interval as 2.05-27.81, 1.26-13.88, P<0.05). (3) Follow‑up: of 91 patients, 87 cases were successfully followed up for 44(range, 5-125) months. The 5‑year survival rate was 51.8%, with a median survival time of 66(range, 5-125) months. The 5‑year survival rate was 52.1% and median survival time was 66(range, 6-124) months for the conventional resection group, versus 50.8% and 69(range, 5-125)months for the extended resection group, showing no significant difference in survival between the two groups (χ2=0.77, P>0.05). (4) Influencing factors analysis of postoperative survival of PHCC patients undergoing radical resection: results of multivariate analysis indicated that microvascular invasion was an independent influencing factor for postoperative survival in patients undergoing radical resection for PHCC (hazard ratio=2.52, 95% confidence interval as 1.16-5.42, P<0.05).
    Conclusions Compared with conventional radical resection for PHCC, extended radical resection is associated with longer operation time and postoperative hospital stay, increased intraoperative blood loss, higher risks of intra‑abdominal infection, pancreatic fistula, and severe postoperative complications. There is no significant difference in the death in hospital and 5‑year survival between the two groups. Microvascular invasion is an independent influencing factor for postoperative survival in patients undergoing radical resection for PHCC.

     

/

返回文章
返回