十字立体缝合在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中处理假性疝囊临床疗效的前瞻性研究

Clinical efficay of cruciate gear suture for pseudo hernia sac management in laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal repair: a prospective study

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨十字立体缝合在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中处理假性疝囊的临床疗效。
    方法 采用前瞻性随机对照研究方法。选取2025年4—12月四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院收治的82例原发性腹股沟直疝患者的临床资料。患者均行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术,采用随机数字表法将患者分为试验组和对照组,分别采用十字立体缝合法和单手四针缝合法处理假性疝囊。观察指标:(1)入组患者分组情况。(2)手术情况。(3)随访情况。正态分布的计量资料组间比较采用独立样本t检验。偏态分布的计量资料组间比较采用Mann‑Whitney U检验。计数资料组间比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。
    结果 (1)入组患者分组情况:筛选出符合条件的原发性腹股沟直疝患者82例(107侧假性疝囊);均为男性,年龄为(64±11)岁。82例患者随机分配至试验组39例(53侧假性疝囊),对照组43例(54侧假性疝囊)。两组患者年龄、身高、体质量、体质量指数、高血压、糖尿病、直疝位置、缺损长径比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。(2)手术情况:两组患者均顺利完成手术。试验组和对照组患者假性疝囊缝合时间分别为(184±45)s和(219±46)s,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=-3.97,P<0.05)。两组患者手术时间、术后24 h视觉模拟量表评分、术后住院时间、住院费用、术后1周卡罗来纳舒适量表评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(3)随访情况:所有患者获得随访,随访时间为6.3(3.9, 8.4)个月。随访期间,试验组和对照组术区不适感持续时间>30 d患者分别为1例和4例,术后血清肿分别为0例和1例,两组患者上述指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者均无疝复发。
    结论 十字立体缝合应用于男性腹股沟直疝患者腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术安全、有效,可显著缩短假性疝囊处理时间。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of cruciate gear suture (CGS) for pseudo hernia sac management in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair.
    Methods The prospective randomized controlled study was conducted. The clinical data of 82 patients with primary direct inguinal hernia who were admitted to Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People′s Hospital from April to December 2025 were selected. Patients underwent laparoscopic TAPP repair. Patients were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group by the random number table.The pseudo⁃sac was closed with CGS in the experimental group and single‑hand four‑needle suture technique in the control group. Observation indicators: (1) grouping of enrolled patients; (2) surgical situations; (3) follow‑up. Comparison of measurement data with normal distribution between groups was conducted using the independent sample t test. Comparison of measurement data with skewed distribution between groups was conducted using the Mann‑Whitney U test. Comparison of count data between groups was conducted using the chi‑square test or Fisher exact probability.
    Results (1)Grouping of enrolled patients: a total of 82 patients with 107 pseudo hernia sacs eligible for primary direct inguinal hernia were selected. They were males, aged (64±11) years. All 82 patients were randomly divided into the experimental group (39 patients with 53 pseudo hernia sacs) and the control group (43 patients with 54 pseudo hernia sacs). There was no significant difference in age, height, weight, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, direct hernia location, and maximum defect diameter between the two groups (P>0.05), indicating comparability. (2) Surgical situations: all patients in both groups underwent successful surgery. The pseudo‑sac management time was (184±45) seconds for the experimental group, versus (219±46) seconds for the control group, showing a significant difference between the two groups (t=-3.97, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in total operation time, 24 hours visual analog scale scores, postoperative hospital stay, hospital costs, Carolina comfort scale at postoperative week 1 between two groups (P>0.05). (3) Follow‑up: all patients were followed up for 6.3(3.9,8.4) months. During follow‑up, cases with surgical site discomfort lasting >30 days were 1 and 4 in the experimental group and control group, cases with postoperative seroma were 0 and 1, respectively, showing no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). No hernia recurrence was observed in either group.
    Conclusion Application of CGS during laparoscopic TAPP repair for male patients with direct inguinal hernia is safe and effective, and significantly reduces the pseudo⁃sac management time.

     

/

返回文章
返回