基于磁共振弹性成像检查构建识别慢性乙型病毒性肝炎显著性肝纤维化高风险状态预测模型的应用价值

Application value of a prediction model constructed by magnetic resonance elastography in identifying high-risk state of chronic hepatitis B associated significant liver fibrosis

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨基于磁共振弹性成像检查构建识别慢性乙型病毒性肝炎(CHB)患者显著性肝纤维化高风险状态预测模型的应用价值。
    方法 采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2024年5月至2025年7月重庆医科大学附属第二医院收治的94例CHB患者的临床资料;男73例,女21例;年龄为48(38,55)岁。94例患者中,53例为显著性肝纤维化高风险状态,41例为低风险状态。观察指标:(1)影响识别患者显著性肝纤维化高风险状态的因素分析。(2)患者显著性肝纤维化高风险状态预测模型的构建与评估。偏态分布的计量资料组间比较采用Mann⁃Whitney U检验。计数资料组间比较采用χ2检验。单因素和多因素分析采用Logistic回归模型。模型区分度通过五折交叉验证评估,绘制受试者工作特征曲线,以曲线下面积(AUC)、灵敏度、特异度评价模型诊断价值。采用1 000次Bootstrap自助抽样绘制校准曲线并进行Hosmer⁃Lemeshow检验评价拟合度。校准曲线评价列线图预测模型的一致性,决策曲线评价临床获益度。
    结果 (1)影响识别患者显著性肝纤维化高风险状态的因素分析:多因素分析结果示磁共振弹性成像弹性值和肝脏表观弥散系数(ADC)值均是识别患者显著性纤维化高风险状态的独立影响因素比值比=6.737,0.001,95%可信区间(CI)为2.164~20.978,0.000~0.284,P<0.05。(2)患者显著性肝纤维化高风险状态预测模型的构建与评估:磁共振弹性成像弹性值受试者工作特征曲线结果示最佳截断值为3.955 kPa,AUC为0.791(95%CI为0.687~0.895),灵敏度为0.962,特异度为0.610,约登指数为0.572。肝脏ADC值受试者工作特征曲线结果显示:最佳截断值为1.175×10-3 mm2/s,AUC为0.753(95%CI为0.654~0.852),灵敏度为0.736,特异度为0.732,约登指数为0.468。根据多因素分析结果,纳入磁共振弹性成像弹性值和肝脏ADC值构建识别患者显著性肝纤维化高风险状态的联合模型。联合模型受试者工作特征曲线分析结果显示:AUC为0.810(95%CI为0.713~0.907),灵敏度为0.868,特异度为0.732,约登指数为0.600。校准曲线结果显示:联合模型预测概率与实际发生概率拟合良好,Hosmer⁃Lemeshow检验结果为χ²=10.049,df=8,P>0.05,提示联合模型具有良好的校准度。决策曲线分析结果显示:在常见阈值概率范围内,联合模型可获得较高的净获益,具有较高的临床应用价值。
    结论 磁共振弹性成像弹性值和肝脏ADC值均是识别CHB患者显著性肝纤维化高风险状态的独立影响因素。两项指标在CHB患者显著性肝纤维化高风险状态诊断中具有可靠效能,两者联合构建的预测模型可提升诊断效能。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the application value of a prediction model constructed by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in identifying high-risk state of significant liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).
    Methods The retrospective cohort study was constructed. The clinical data of 94 patients with CHB who were admitted to The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from May 2024 to July 2025 were collected. There were 73 males and 21 females, aged 48 (38,55) years. Of the 94 patients, 53 were classified as being in the high-risk state of significant hepatic fibrosis, and 41 in the low-risk state. Observation indicators: (1) analysis of factors influencing high-risk state of significant liver fibrosis in patients; (2) construction and evaluation of a prediction model in predicting high-risk state of significant liver fibrosis in patients. Comparison of measurement data with skewed distribution between groups was conducted by using the Mann-Whitney U test. Comparison of count data between groups was conducted by using the chi-square test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted by using Logistic regression model. The model discrimination was evaluated through five-fold cross-validation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to assess the diagnostic value of the model based on the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. A calibration curve was plotted using 1 000 bootstrap self-sampling, and the fit was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. The consistency of the nomogram prediction model was evaluated using the calibration curve, and the clinical benefit was evaluated using the decision curve.
    Results (1) Analysis of factors influencing high-risk state of significant liver fibrosis in patients: results of multivariate analysis showed that MRE stiffness value and liver apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value were independent influencing factors in identi-fying high-risk state of significant liver fibrosis in patients (odds ratio=6.737, 0.001, 95% confidence interval as 2.164‒20.978, 0.000‒0.284, P<0.05). (2) Construction and evaluation of a prediction model in predicting high-risk state of significant liver fibrosis in patients: results of ROC curve for MRE stiffness value showed that the optimal cutoff value was 3.955 kPa, the AUC was 0.791 (95% confidence interval as 0.687‒0.895), sensitivity was 0.962, specificity was 0.610, and the Yoden index was 0.572. Results of ROC curve for liver ADC value showed that the optimal cutoff value was 1.175×10-3 mm2/s, the AUC was 0.753 (95% confidence interval as 0.654‒0.852), sensitivity was 0.736, specificity was 0.732, and the Yoden index was 0.468. Based on the results of multivariate analysis, a combined model was constructed by using the MRE stiffness value and liver ADC value in predicting high-risk state of significant liver fibrosis in patients, and results of ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC was 0.810 (95% confidence interval as 0.713‒0.907), the sensitivity was 0.868, the specificity was 0.732, and the Yoden index was 0.600. Results of calibration curve indicated a good fit between the predicted probabilities of the combined model and the actual occurrence probabilities. Results of Hosmer⁃Lemeshow test showed that χ²=10.049, df=8, P>0.05, suggesting good calibration of the model. Results of decision curve analysis showed that within the common threshold probability range, the combined model achieved high net benefit, indicating its high clinical application value.
    Conclusion Both the MRE stiffness value and liver ADC value are independent influencing factors in identifying high-risk state of significant liver fibrosis in patients with CHB. These indicators exhibit reliable efficacy in diagnosing the high-risk state of significant liver fibrosis in CHB patients, and the prediction model constructed by combining them can enhance diagnostic efficacy.

     

/

返回文章
返回