保留左结肠动脉及直肠上动脉腹腔镜乙状结肠癌根治术的临床疗效

Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection for sigmoid cancer with preservation of the left colic artery and superior rectal artery

  • 摘要:
    探讨保留左结肠动脉(LCA)及直肠上动脉(SRA)腹腔镜乙状结肠癌根治术的临床疗效。
    采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2023年1—12月中国医学科学院肿瘤医院收治的312例乙状结肠癌患者的临床病理资料;男180例,女132例;年龄为(56±12)岁。312例患者根据术中处理肠系膜下动脉(IMA)及其分支的情况分为两组,114例行保留LCA和SRA腹腔镜乙状结肠癌根治术,设为保留血管组;198例行IMA根部结扎的腹腔镜乙状结肠癌根治术,设为根部结扎组。观察指标:(1)术中及术后情况。(2)病理学检查情况。(3)随访情况。正态分布的计量资料组间比较采用独立样本t检验;偏态分布的计量资料组间比较采用Mann‑Whitney U检验。计数资料组间比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法;等级资料组间比较采用Mann‑Whitney U检验。
    (1)术中及术后情况。保留血管组患者术后首次肛门排气时间为(2.2±1.1)d、引流管留置时间为(4.0±0.8)d,术后住院时间为(6.1±1.2)d;根部结扎组患者上述指标分别为(3.3±1.8)d、(5.5±1.0)d、(7.1±1.1)d,两组患者上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=-6.63、-15.28、-7.76,P<0.05)。(2)病理学检查情况。两组患者淋巴结检出数目、阳性淋巴结检出数目、第253组淋巴结检出数目、脉管瘤栓、神经侵犯、肿瘤TNM分期比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(3)随访情况。180例男性患者均获得随访,随访时间为9(3~14)个月。随访期间,保留血管组63例男性患者中,泌尿功能障碍为无症状及轻度症状62例、中度症状1例,勃起功能无障碍61例、轻度障碍2例;根部结扎组117例男性患者中,泌尿功能障碍为无症状及轻度症状114例、中度症状3例,勃起功能无障碍112例、轻度障碍5例;两组患者上述指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(Z=-0.42,-0.36,P>0.05)。两组均无重度泌尿功能障碍和勃起功能障碍患者。
    保留LCA及SRA腹腔镜乙状结肠癌根治术安全、可行;与根部结扎比较,其未增加手术时间及术后并发症,肿瘤根治性相当,且缩短患者术后恢复时间。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection for sigmoid cancer with preservation of the left colic artery (LCA) and superior rectal artery (SRA).
    Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 312 patients with sigmoid cancer who were admitted to Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January to December 2023 were collected. There were 180 males and 132 females, aged (56±12)years. According to the intraoperative management of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and its branches, all 312 patients were divided into two groups. The 114 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection for sigmoid cancer with preservation of the LCA and SRA were divided into the vascular preservation group, and the 198 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection for sigmoid cancer with ligation of the root of IMA were divided into the root ligation group. Observa-tion indicators: (1) intraoperative and postoperative conditions; (2) pathological examinations; (3) follow‑up. Comparison of measurement data with normal distribution between groups was conducted using the independent sample t test. Comparison of measurement data with skewed distribution between groups was conducted using the Mann‑Whitney U test. Comparison of count data between groups was conducted using the chi‑square test or Fisher exact probability. Comparison of ordinal data between groups was conducted using the Mann‑Whitney U test.
    Results (1) Intraoperative and postoperative conditions. For patients in the vascular preservation group, the time to postopera-tive first flatus was (2.2±1.1)days, the indwelling time of abdominal drainage tube was (4.0±0.8)days, duration of postoperative hospital stay was (6.1±1.2)days. For patients in the root ligation group, the above indicators were (3.3±1.8)days, (5.5±1.0)days, (7.1±1.1)days. There were significant differences in the above indicators between the two groups of patients (t=-6.63, -15.28, -7.76, P<0.05). (2) Pathological examinations. There was no significant difference in the number of lymph nodes retrieved, the number of positive lymph nodes, the number of No.253 lymph nodes retrieved, vascular tumor thrombus, perineural invasion, and tumor TNM staging between the two groups of patients (P>0.05). (3) Follow‑up. All 180 males patients were followed up for 9(range, 3-14)months. Of the 63 males in the vascular preservation group during the follow‑up period, 62 cases experienced with asympto-matic and mild symptoms of urinary dysfunction and 1 case experienced with moderate symptoms, 61 cases experienced with no dysfunction of erectile dysfunction and 2 cases experienced with mild dysfunction of erectile dysfunction. Of the 117 males in the root ligation group, 114 cases experienced with asymptomatic and mild symptoms of urinary dysfunction and 3 cases experienced with moderate symptoms, 112 cases experienced with no dysfunction of erectile dysfunction and 5 cases experienced with mild dysfunction of erectile dysfunction. There was no significant difference in the above indicators between the two groups of patients (Z=-0.42, -0.36, P>0.05). There was no patient with severe symptoms of urinary dysfunction or severe dysfunction of erectile dysfunction in either of the two groups.
    Conclusions Laparoscopic radical resection for sigmoid cancer with preserva-tion of the LCA and SRA is safe and feasible. Compared with the root ligation group, there is no increase in operation time or postoperative complications, and the tumor curative effect is comparable, while patient′s postoperative recovery time is shortened.

     

/

返回文章
返回