肝细胞癌合并高危复发因素患者术后辅助靶向联合免疫治疗的效果分析

Efficacy analysis of postoperative adjuvant targeted‑immunotherapy of hepatocellular carci-noma patients with high‑risk recurrence factors

  • 摘要:
    探讨肝细胞癌(简称肝癌)合并高危复发因素患者术后辅助靶向联合免疫治疗(简称靶免治疗)的效果。
    采用倾向评分匹配及回顾性队列研究方法。收集2020年1月至2023年12月中国科学技术大学附属第一医院收治的431例肝癌合并高危复发因素患者的临床病理资料;男359例,女72例;年龄为(59±10)岁。患者均行根治性肝切除术。431例患者中,60例行术后辅助靶免治疗,设为辅助治疗组;371例术后未行辅助靶免治疗,设为随访监测组。观察指标:(1)倾向评分匹配及匹配后两组患者一般资料比较。(2)患者预后分析。(3)患者无复发生存的影响因素分析。(4)亚组分析。(5)安全性分析。正态分布的计量资料组间比较采用独立样本t检验。偏态分布的计量资料组间比较采用Mann‑Whitney U检验。计数资料组间比较采用χ²检验或Fisher确切概率法。等级资料组间比较采用非参数秩和检验。采用Kaplan‑Meier法计算生存率并绘制生存曲线,Log‑rank检验进行生存分析。单因素及多因素分析采用多变量Cox回归模型。采用单变量Cox回归模型进行亚组生存分析,并绘制森林图。倾向评分匹配按1∶2最优完全匹配法进行匹配,卡钳值为0.02。
    (1)倾向评分匹配及匹配后两组患者一般资料比较。431例患者中,180例匹配成功,辅助治疗组60例,随访监测组120例。倾向评分匹配后消除丙氨酸转氨酶及术后辅助经导管动脉化疗栓塞术治疗混杂因素的影响,具有可比性。(2)患者预后分析。倾向评分匹配后,辅助治疗组患者中位无复发生存时间为31.8个月,1、2、3年无复发生存率分别为81.7%、55.3%、46.8%;随访监测组患者中位无复发生存时间为17.2个月,1、2、3年无复发生存率分别为56.7%、44.2%、34.7%;两组患者无复发生存情况比较,差异有统计学意义(χ²=4.984,P<0.05)。(3)患者无复发生存的影响因素分析。多因素分析结果显示:微血管侵犯、门静脉侵犯、卫星灶是影响肝癌合并高危复发因素患者术后无复发生存的独立危险因素(风险比=1.955,2.524,1.883,95%可信区间为1.141~3.347,1.346~4.734,1.262~2.812,P<0.05);术后辅助靶免治疗是影响肝癌合并高危复发因素患者术后无复发生存的独立保护因素(风险比=0.580,95%可信区间为0.378~0.889,P<0.05)。(4)亚组分析。倾向评分匹配后,术后辅助靶免治疗可改善女性、年龄≤65岁、白蛋白‑胆红素分级2级、血小板计数≥100×109/L、肝炎、肝硬化、肿瘤切缘距离<1 cm、Edmondson⁃Steiner分级为Ⅲ~Ⅳ级、单发肿瘤、微血管侵犯、无门静脉侵犯及卫星灶患者的无复发生存情况(P<0.05)。(5)安全性分析。辅助治疗组患者疗程为11(5,16)个,16例患者因非复发事件永久停药。治疗期间,辅助治疗组58例患者出现常见不良反应,其中42例发生1级或2级不良反应,16例发生3级不良反应,无治疗相关死亡。
    肝癌合并高危复发因素患者术后辅助靶免治疗可改善其无复发生存情况,且具有良好的安全性与耐受性,不良反应可控。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To evaluate the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant targeted-immuno-therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with high‑risk recurrence factors.
    Methods The propensity score matching (PSM) and retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopatholo-gical data of 431 HCC patients with high‑risk recurrence factors who were admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China between January 2020 and December 2023 were collected.There were 359 males and 72 females, aged (59±10)years. Patients underwent radical hepatectomy. Of 431 patients, 60 cases receiving postoperative adjuvant targeted-immunotherapy were allocated into adjuvant therapy group, and 371 patients not receiving post-operative adjuvant targeted‑immunotherapy were allocated into surveillance group. Observation indicators: (1)PSM and comparison of general data of patients between the two groups after matching; (2) prognostic analysis of patients; (3) analysis of factors influencing recurrence‑free survival (RFS) of patients; (4) subgroup analysis; (5) safety analysis. Comparison of measurement data with normal distribution between groups was conducted using the independent sample t test. Comparison of measurement data with skewed distribution between groups was conducted using the Mann‑Whitney U test. Comparison of count data between groups was conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. Comparison of ordinal data was conducted using the non-parameter rank sum test. The Kaplan‑Meier method was used to calculate survival rates and plot survival curves, and Log‑rank test was used for survival analysis.The multivariate Cox regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses. Subgroup survival analysis was conducted using univariate Cox regression model, and forest plots were generated. PSM was performed using the 1∶2 optimal full matching method with a caliper value of 0.02.
    Results (1)PSM and comparison of general data of patients between the two groups after matching. Of the 431 patients, 180 cases were successfully matched, with 60 cases in the adjuvant therapy group and 120 cases in the surveillance group. After PSM, the elimination of alanine aminotransferase level and postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization confounding bias ensured comparability. (2) Prognostic analysis of patients. After PSM, the median RFS time was 31.8 months and 1‑, 2‑, 3‑year RFS rates were 81.7%, 55.3%, 46.8% in the adjuvant therapy group, versus 17.2 months and 56.7%, 44.2%, 34.7% in the surveillance group, showing a significant difference in RFS between the two groups (χ²=4.984, P<0.05). (3) Analysis of factors influencing RFS of patients. Results of multivariate analysis showed that microvascular invasion, portal vein invasion, and satellite nodules were inde-pendent risk factors for postoperative RFS of HCC patients with high‑risk recurrence factors (hazard ratio=1.955, 2.524, 1.883, 95% confidence interval as 1.141-3.347, 1.346-4.734, 1.262-2.812, P<0.05). Postoperative adjuvant targeted‑immunotherapy was an independent protective factor for postoperative RFS of HCC patients with high‑risk recurrence factors(hazard ratio=0.580, 95% confidence interval as 0.378-0.889, P<0.05). (4) Subgroup analysis. After PSM, postoperative adjuvant targeted-immunotherapy improved RFS in subgroups including patients as female, aged ≤65 years, or with albumin‑bilirubin grade 2, platelet count ≥100×10⁹/L, hepatitis, cirrhosis, tumor margin distance <1 cm, Edmondson-Steiner grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ, solitary tumor, presence of microvascular invasion, absence of portal vein invasion, and presence of satellite nodules (P<0.05). (5) Safety analysis. The median number of treatment cycles in the adjuvant therapy group was 11(5,16). Sixteen patients discon-tinued treatment permanently due to non‑recurrence events. During treatment, 58 patients in the adjuvant therapy group experienced adverse events, including 42 cases of grade 1 or 2 adverse events, and 16 cases of grade 3 adverse events. No treatment‑related death occurred.
    Conclusion Postoperative adjuvant targeted‑immunotherapy can improve RFS in HCC patients with high‑risk recurrence factors and demonstrate a favorable safety and tolerability profile with manageable adverse events.

     

/

返回文章
返回