食管贲门失弛缓症腹腔镜Heller‑Dor术后发生胃食管反流病的影响因素分析

Analysis of influencing factors for gastroesophageal reflux disease after laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery for esophageal achalasia

  • 摘要:
    探讨食管贲门失弛缓症腹腔镜Heller‑Dor术后发生胃食管反流病(GERD)的影响因素。
    采用回顾性病例对照研究方法。收集2021年1月至2023年12月山西省肿瘤医院收治的210例食管贲门失弛缓症患者的临床资料;男119例,女91例;年龄为(47±12)岁。患者均行腹腔镜Heller‑Dor术。观察指标:(1)手术情况。(2)随访情况。(3)影响腹腔镜Heller‑Dor术后发生GERD的因素。(4)腹腔镜Heller‑Dor术后发生GERD预测模型的构建与评价。采用Logistic逐步回归模型进行单因素和多因素分析。根据多因素分析结果构建GERD预测列线图模型,计算受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评价模型的预测效能;校准曲线评估模型的准确性;决策曲线评估模型的总体净收益。
    (1)手术情况。210例患者均行腹腔镜Heller‑Dor术,手术时间为(128±31)min,术中出血量为(25±9)mL,食管下括约肌(LES)切开长度为(5±3)cm,食管下段切开>6 cm 49例、胃底切开长度>2 cm 58例。3例患者术中发生黏膜穿孔,行及时修补。1例患者中转开腹。18例患者术后发生并发症。患者术后住院时间为(4.3±2.4)d。(2)随访情况。210例患者均获得术后随访,随访时间为4(7~33)个月。随访期间,210例患者中,发生GERD 32例,其中表现为吞咽困难17例、反酸烧心25例(同一例患者可合并两种症状),BMI>28 kg/m2 29例。210例患者症状严重程度评分包括烧心为0.6(0~3.0)分、反流为0.7(0~3.0)分、胸痛为0.4(0~2.0)分、咳嗽声嘶为0.5(0~2.0)分、恶心呕吐为0.3(0~2.0)分、吞咽困难为0.8(0~3.0)分,LES静息压为(15±8)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),LES松弛率为81%±13%,综合松弛压为(9±6)mmHg,食管测压分型Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型、Ⅲ型分别为0、8、0例。208例患者经药物或对症治疗后症状缓解,仅有2例症状较重患者药物无效,后转外院手术并改善。(3)影响腹腔镜Heller⁃Dor术后发生GERD的因素。多因素分析结果显示:男性、吸烟史、食管下段切开长度>6 cm、术后BMI>28 kg/m2是影响食管贲门失弛缓症行腹腔镜Heller‑Dor术后发生GERD的独立危险因素(比值比=4.02、6.34、5.41、7.38,95%可信区间为1.50~10.78、3.31~12.31、1.77~13.47、2.80~15.42,P<0.05)。(4)腹腔镜Heller‑Dor术后发生GERD预测模型的构建与评价。根据多因素分析结果构建GERD的预测列线图模型。列线图模型预测GRED的受试者工作特征曲线AUC为0.91(95%可信区间为0.82~0.97),具有良好的区分能力。校准曲线结果显示:模型的预测概率与实际发生概率拟合良好,绝对误差均值为0.033,验证了模型的准确性。决策曲线结果显示:阈值范围为0.2~0.8时,预测模型的净收益显著高于“全干预”和“无干预”策略,表明模型在临床决策中具有较高的实用价值。
    男性、吸烟史、食管下段切开长度>6 cm、术后BMI>28 kg/m2是影响食管贲门失弛缓症行腹腔镜Heller‑Dor术后发生GERD的独立危险因素。基于此构建食管贲门失弛缓症腹腔镜Heller‑Dor术后发生GERD的预测模型具有良好的预测性能。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the influencing factors for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after laparoscopic Heller‑Dor surgery for esophageal achalasia.
    Methods The retrospective case‑control study was conducted. The clinical data of 210 patients with esophageal achalasia who were admitted to Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital from January 2021 to December 2023 were collected. There were 119 males and 91 females, aged (47±12)years. All patients underwent laparoscopic Heller‑Dor surgery. Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations; (2) follow‑up; (3) influencing factors for GERD after laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery; (4) development and evaluation of a predictive model for GERD after laparoscopic Heller‑Dor surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using stepwise Logistic regression. Results of multivariate analysis were used to construct a nomogram in predicting GERD. The predictive performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The calibration curve was used to evaluate the accuracy of the model, and the decision curve was used to assess the overall net benefit of the model.
    Results (1) Surgical situations. All 210 patients underwent laparoscopic Heller‑Dor surgery. The operation time was (128±31)minutes, volume of intraoperative blood loss was (25±9)mL, and length of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) myotomy was (5±3)cm. The length of low esophageal myotomy >6 cm was performed in 49 patients, and length of gastric fundus myotomy >2 cm was performed in 58 patients. Intraoperative mucosal perforation occurred to 3 patients and was repaired intraoperatively. One patient required conversion to open surgery. Postoperative complications occurred in 18 patients. The duration of postoperative hospital stay was (4.3±2.4)days. (2) Follow‑up. All 210 patients were followed up for 4(range,7-33)months after surgery. During follow‑up, 32 pati-ents had GERD, including 17 cases presenting dysphagia and 25 cases presenting acid regurgitation and heartburn (the same patient may have two symptoms). There were 29 cases with body mass index (BMI) >28 kg/m². Symptom severity scores of 210 patients showed heartburn of 0.6(range, 0-3.0), reflux of 0.7(range, 0-3.0), chest pain of 0.4(range, 0-2.0), cough and hoarseness of 0.5(range, 0-2.0), nausea and vomiting 0.3(range, 0-2.0), dysphagia 0.8(range, 0-3.0). The LES pressure was (15±8)mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), LES relaxation rate was 81%±13.0%, and integrated relaxation pressure was (9±6)mmHg. Esophageal manometry classification showed type Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ in 0, 8, and 0 patients, respectively. There were 208 patients achieved symptom relief after drug or symptomatic treatment. Only two patients with severe symptoms were unresponsive to medication and subsequently underwent surgery at another hospital, with symptoms improving postoperatively. (3) Influen-cing factors for GERD after laparoscopic Heller‑Dor surgery. Results of multivariate analysis showed that male, smoking history, length of lower esophageal myotomy >6 cm, and postoperative BMI >28 kg/m² were independent risk factors for GERD after laparoscopic Heller‑Dor surgery (odds ratio=4.02, 6.34, 5.41, 7.38, 95% confidence interval as 1.50-10.78, 3.31-12.31, 1.77-13.47, 2.80-15.42, P<0.05). (4) Development and evaluation of a predictive model for GERD after laparoscopic Heller‑Dor surgery. A predictive nomogram model for GERD was constructed based on the results of multivariate analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve of predictive nomogram model for GERD had an area under curve of 0.91 (95% confidence interval as 0.82-0.97), demonstrating good discrimination. The calibration curve showed good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities, with a mean absolute error of 0.033. The decision curve demonstrated that within a threshold probability range of 0.2-0.8, the predictive model had greater net benefit than "treat‑all" or "treat‑none" strategies, indicating clinical utility of this model in clinical decision.
    Conclusions Male, smoking history, length of lower esophageal myotomy >6 cm, and postoperative BMI >28 kg/m² are independent risk factors for GERD after laparoscopic Heller‑Dor surgery for esophageal achalasia. The predictive model for GERD after laparoscopic Heller‑Dor surgery based on these factors shows strong predictive accuracy.

     

/

返回文章
返回