CT检查影像组学模型对胰腺导管腺癌预后的预测价值

Predictive value of CT based radiomics model for the prognosis of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

  • 摘要:
    探讨CT检查影像组学模型对胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)预后的预测价值。
    采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2018年8月至2020年12月复旦大学附属中山医院收治的206例PDAC患者的临床病理资料;男115例,女91例;年龄为(64±9)岁。206例患者术前均行CT增强检查,并采用随机数字表法按4∶1比例分为训练集165例和验证集41例。训练集用于构建预测模型,验证集用于评价预测模型效能。观察指标:(1)随访情况。(2)训练集PDAC患者的预后因素分析。(3)PDAC患者预后预测模型的构建与评价。正态分布的计量资料组间比较采用t检验。偏态分布的计量资料组间比较采用Wilcoxon W检验。计数资料组间比较采用χ²检验或校正χ²检验。采用Kaplan‑Meier法计算生存率,Log‑rank检验进行生存分析。单因素和多因素分析均采用COX回归模型。采用PyCharm软件进行最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)⁃COX回归分析。绘制受试者工作特征曲线评估影像组学模型效能。
    (1)随访情况。206例患者中,205例获得随访,随访时间为17.1(12.0~40.1)个月。术后1、2、3年生存率分别为80.10%、29.61%和4.85%。(2)训练集PDAC患者的预后因素分析。多因素分析结果显示:病理学N分期是训练集PDAC患者预后的独立影响因素(风险比=1.476,95%可信区间为1.054~2.067,P<0.05)。(3)PDAC患者预后预测模型的构建与评价。206例PDAC患者共提取1 595个影像组学特征,经组内筛选并通过LASSO⁃COX回归分析降维得到10个影像组学特征。将10个影像组学特征联合11个重要临床特征再次应用LASSO‑COX回归分析进行筛选,最终筛选出15个特征,构建基于CT检查影像组学特征的PDAC预后预测模型。该模型预测训练集患者2年和3年总生存率受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.834(95%可信区间为0.777~0.891)和0.883(95%可信区间为0.834~0.932);验证集上述指标分别为0.606(95%可信区间为0.456~0.756)和0.625(95%可信区间为0.477~0.773)。
    基于CT检查影像组学特征联合重要临床特征构建PDAC预后的预测模型可较好预测PDAC患者的预后。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the predictive value of computed tomography(CT) based radiomics model for the prognosis of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC).
    Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 206 PDAC patients who were admitted to Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University from August 2018 to December 2020 were collected. There were 115 males and 91 females, aged (64±9)years. All 206 pati-ents underwent enhanced CT examination. Based on radom number table, the 206 patients were randomly divided into a training set of 165 cases and a validation set of 41 cases with a ratio of 4∶1. The training set was used to construct the prediction model, and the test set was used to validate the performance of the prediction model. Observation indicators: (1) follow‑up; (2) analysis of prognostic factors of PDAC patients in the training set; (3) construction and evaluation of prediction model for prognosis of PDAC patients. Comparison of measurement data with normal distribution between groups was conducted using the t test. Comparison of measurement data with skewed distribution between groups was conducted using the Wilcoxon W test. Comparison of count data between groups was conducted using the chi‑square test or corrected chi‑square test. The Kaplan‑Meier method was used to calculate the survival rate and Log‑rank test was used for survival analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using the COX regression model. The PyCharm software was used for the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method (LASSO)-COX regression analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to evaluate the performance of radiomics model.
    Results (1)Follow‑up. Of the 206 patients,205 cases were followed up for 17.1(range, 12.0‒40.1)months. The postoperative 1‑, 2‑, 3‑year survival rates were 80.10%, 29.61% and 4.85%. (2) Analysis of prognostic factors for PDAC patients in the training dataset. Results of multivariate analysis showed that pathological N stage was an independent influencing factor for prognosis of PDAC patients in the training set (hazard ratio=1.476, 95% confidence interval as 1.054‒2.067, P<0.05). (3) Construction and evaluation of prediction model for prognosis of PDAC patients. A total of 1 595 radiomics features were finally extracted from the 206 patients. By intra‑group feature selection and dimensionality reduction using LASSO‑COX regression model, 10 radiomics features were obtained. Combined with 10 radiomics features and 11 clinical features, using the LASSO‑COX regression analysis, 15 features were finally extracted to construct the CT based radiomics model for predicting prognosis of PDAC. The areas under receiver operating characteristic curve of the prediction model in predicting 2‑year and 3‑year overall survival rates of PDAC patients in the training set were 0.834 (95% confidence interval as 0.777‒0.891) and 0.883 (95% confidence interval as 0.834‒0.932), respectively. The area under curve of the prediction model for patients in the validation set was 0.606 (95% confidence interval as 0.456‒0.756) and 0.625 (95% confidence interval as 0.477‒0.773).
    Conclusion The prediction model constructed on CT based radiomics features and clinical features for predicting the prognosis of PDAC patients shows a promising prediction efficiency.

     

/

返回文章
返回