开放腹壁肌筋膜前修补术治疗腹壁切口疝的临床疗效

Clinical efficacy of open anterior myofascial repair surgery on abdominal wall incision hernia

  • 摘要:
    探讨开放腹壁肌筋膜前修补术治疗腹壁切口疝的临床疗效。
    采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2016年12月至2024年12月中南大学湘雅医院等全国3家医学中心收治的188例腹壁切口疝患者的临床资料;男85例,女103例;年龄为(62±12)岁。188例患者中,巨大切口疝55例,非巨大切口疝133例,均行开放腹壁肌筋膜前修补术。观察指标:(1)术中情况。(2)术后情况。(3)随访情况。正态分布的计量资料组间比较采用独立样本t检验。偏态分布的计量资料组间比较采用Mann‑Whitney U检验。计数资料组间比较采用χ²检验或Fisher确切概率法。等级资料组间比较采用非参数检验。
    (1)术中情况。55例巨大切口疝患者手术时间为(145±40)min,术中出血量为40.0(22.5,55.0)mL,腹壁缺损分区为正中区前腹壁中央区域、外上象限区、外下象限区分别为26、7、22例,腹壁缺损面积为140(99,169)cm2,补片选择类型为自固定补片、平片分别为29、26例;133例非巨大切口疝患者上述指标分别为(124±34)min,35.0(30.0,45.0)mL,47、26、60例,25(12,40)cm2,67、66例;两类患者手术时间、腹壁缺损面积比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=-3.651,Z=-10.339,P<0.05),术中出血量、腹壁缺损分区、补片选择类型比较,差异均无统计学意义(Z=-0.501,χ²=2.692、0.086,P>0.05)。(2)术后情况。55例巨大切口疝患者中,7例术后发生浆液肿,其中5例合并切口感染;4例术后发生切口感染。133例非巨大切口疝患者中,15例术后发生浆液肿,其中3例合并切口感染;两类患者术后切口感染比较,差异有统计学意义(χ²=10.707,P<0.05),术后浆液肿比较,差异无统计学意义(χ²=0.079,P>0.05)。55例巨大切口疝患者术后住院时间为7(6,9)d,133例非巨大切口疝患者术后住院时间为5(4,6)d,两类患者比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=-6.292,P<0.05)。(3)随访情况。188例患者术后均获得随访,随访时间为43(29~67)个月。随访期间,9例患者疝复发,其中巨大切口疝患者7例(4例行再次手术治疗、3例行保守治疗),非巨大切口疝患者2例,均行保守治疗,两类患者疝复发比较,差异有统计学意义(χ²=8.432,P<0.05)。术后3个月慢性疼痛评分结果显示:55例巨大切口疝患者中,轻度疼痛、中度疼痛、重度疼痛分别为40、7、8例,133例非巨大切口疝患者上述指标分别为102、28、3例,两类患者比较,差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.968,P>0.05)。
    开放腹壁肌筋膜前修补术可用于治疗腹壁切口疝。与非巨大切口疝比较,巨大切口疝患者手术时间更长,术后更易发生切口感染,术后住院时间更长,且更易发生疝复发。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of open anterior myofascial repair surgery on abdominal wall incision hernia.
    Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 188 patients who underwent open anterior myofascial repair surgery on abdo-minal wall incision hernia at three medical centers, including Xiangya Hospital of Central South University et al, from December 2016 to December 2024 were collected. There were 85 males and 103 females, aged (62±12)years. Of the 188 patients, 55 cases had large incisional hernia and 133 cases had non‑large incisional hernia. Observation indicators: (1) intraoperative conditions; (2) postopera-tive conditions; (3) follow‑up. Comparison of measurement data with normal distribution between groups was conducted using the independent sample t test. Comparison of measurement data with skewed distribution between groups was conducted using the Mann‑Whitney U test. Comparison of count data between groups was conducted using the chi‑square test or Fisher exact test. Comparison of ordinal data between groups was conducted using the nonparametic test.
    Results (1) Intra-operative conditions. The operation time of the 55 patients with large incisional hernia was (145±40)minutes, and the volume of intraoperative blood loss was 40.0(22.5,55.0)mL, cases with fascial defect located in the central anterior abdominal wall, the superolateral quadrant, the inferolateral quadrant were 26, 7, 22, the fascial defect area was 140(99,169)cm², cases used with self‑fixating mesh and flat mesh were 29, 26. The above indicators of the 133 patients with non‑large incisional hernia were (124±34)minutes, 35.0(30.0,45.0)mL, 47, 26, 60, 25(12,40)cm², 67, 66, respectively. There were significant differences in operation time and fascial defect area between patients with large incisional hernia and non‑large incisional hernia (t=-3.651, Z=-10.339, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the volume of intraoperative blood loss, defect quadrant distribution, and mesh type (Z=-0.501, χ²=2.692, 0.086, P>0.05). (2) Postoperative conditions. Of the 55 patients with large incisional hernia, 7 cases developed postoperative seroma, including 5 cases combined with concomitant surgical‑site infection, and 4 additional cases developed with surgical‑site infection. Of the 133 patients with non‑large incisional hernia, 15 cases developed postoperative seroma, including 3 cases combined with concomitant surgical‑site infection. There was a significant difference in surgical‑site infection between patients with large incisional hernia and non‑large incisional hernia (χ²=10.707, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in postoperative seroma (χ²=0.079, P>0.05). The duration of postoperative hospital stay was 7(6, 9)days for the 55 patients with large incisional hernia and 5(4, 6)days for the 133 patients with non‑large incisional hernia, showing a significant difference between them (Z=-6.292, P<0.05). (3) Follow‑up. All 188 patients were followed up for 43(range, 29-67)months. During the follow‑up, 9 patients experienced hernia recurrence, including 7 patients with large incisional hernia and 2 patients with non‑large incisional hernia. For the 7 patients of large incisional hernia with hernia recurrence, 4 cases underwent reoperation and 3 cases received conservative treatment. All 2 patients of non‑large incisional hernia with hernia recurrence received conservative treatment. There was no significant difference in hernia recurrence between patients with large incisional hernia and non‑large incisional hernia (χ²=8.432, P<0.05). Results of chronic pain score at postoperative 3 month showed that among 55 patients with large incisional hernia, 40 cases had mild pain, 7 cases had moderate pain, and 8 cases had severe pain. Among 133 patients with non‑large incisional hernia, the above indicators were 102, 28, and 3, respectively. There was no significant difference in chronic pain score at postoperative 3 month between patients with large incisional hernia and non‑large incisional hernia (Z=-0.968, P>0.05).
    Conclusions Open anterior myofascial repair surgery can be used for the treatment of abdominal wall incision hernia. Compared with non-large incisional hernia, patients with large incisional hernia have longer operation time, are more prone to surgical-site infection, have longer postoperative hospital stay, and are more likely to experience hernia recurrence.

     

/

返回文章
返回