低分子肝素桥接治疗在长期口服抗血小板药物患者行腹股沟疝修补术中的临床价值

Clinical value of low molecular weight heparin bridging therapy for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair who with long‑term oral antiplatelet agents

  • 摘要:
    探讨低分子肝素桥接治疗在长期口服抗血小板药物患者行腹股沟疝修补术中的临床价值。
    采用倾向评分匹配及回顾性队列研究方法。收集2017年1月至2025年1月四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院(电子科技大学附属医院)收治的126例长期口服抗血小板药物并行腹股沟疝修补术患者的临床资料;男120例,女6例;年龄为(74±9)岁。126例患者中,77例行腹股沟疝修补术前单纯停用抗血小板药物,设为停药组;49例行腹股沟疝修补术前停用抗血小板药物后予以低分子肝素桥接治疗,设为桥接组。观察指标:(1)倾向评分匹配情况及匹配后两组患者一般资料比较。(2)术中及术后情况。(3)随访情况。正态分布的计量资料组间比较采用独立样本t检验;偏态分布的计量资料组间比较采用Mann‑Whitney U检验。计数资料组间比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。倾向评分匹配按1∶1最近邻匹配法进行匹配,卡钳值为0.1。
    (1)倾向评分匹配情况及匹配后两组患者一般资料比较。126例患者中,90例匹配成功,停药组和桥接组各45例。倾向评分匹配后,消除疝环尺寸、活化部分凝血活酶时间、手术方式因素混杂偏倚,具有可比性。(2)术中及术后情况。倾向评分匹配后,停药组和桥接组患者术中使用血浆引流管分别为8例和1例,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。停药组和桥接组患者术后48 h视觉模拟评分分别为2(1~2)分和2(2~3)分,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.57,P<0.05)。(3)随访情况。倾向评分匹配后,90例患者均获得术后随访,随访时间为16.5(9.0~30.0)d。随访期间,两组患者术后30 d内疼痛、血清肿、伤口感染、再入院比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者均未发生严重血栓事件,无患者死亡。
    与长期口服抗血小板药物行腹股沟疝修补单纯术前停药患者比较,术前停药后予以低分子肝素桥接治疗安全、可行,可减少术中血浆引流管使用,不增加出血风险,但加剧患者术后疼痛。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the clinical value of low molecular weight heparin bridging therapy for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair who with long‑term oral antiplatelet agents.
    Methods The propensity score matching and retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 126 patients undergoing tension‑free inguinal hernia repair who with long‑term oral antiplatelet agents and admitted to Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People′s Hospital (Affiliated Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China) from January 2017 to January 2025 were collected. There were 120 males and 6 females, aged (74±9)years. Of the 126 patients, 77 patients who discontinued antiplatelet agents alone before inguinal hernia repair were set as the drug withdrawal group, and 49 patients who discontinued antiplatelet agents with low molecular weight heparin bridging therapy before inguinal hernia repair were set as the bridging group. Observation indicators: (1) propensity score matching and comparison of general data of patients between the two groups after matching; (2) intraoperative and postopera-tive conditions; (3) follow‑up. Comparison of measurement data with normal distribution between groups was conducted using the independent sample t test. Comparison of measurement data with skewed distribution between groups was conducted using the Mann‑Whitney U test. Comparison of count data between groups was conducted using the chi‑square test or Fisher exact probability. Propensity score matching was performed using the 1∶1 nearest neighbor matching method. The caliper value was set as 0.1.
    Results (1) Propensity score matching and comparison of general data of patients between the two groups after matching. Of the 126 patients, 90 patients were success-fully matched, with 45 cases in each of the drug withdrawal group and the bridging group. After propensity score matching, the elimination of hernia ring size, activated partial thromboplasmin time and surgical method factors confounding bias ensured comparability. (2) Intraoperative and postoperative conditions. After propensity score matching, patients using plasma drainage tubes during the operation in the drug withdrawal group and the bridging group were 8 and 1, respec-tively, showing a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). The visual analogue scale scores of patients in the drug withdrawal group and the bridging group at 48 hours after surgery were 2(range, 1-2) and 2(range, 2-3), respectively, showing a significant difference between the two groups (Z=-2.57, P<0.05). (3) Follow‑up. After propensity score matching, all 90 patients were followed up after surgery for 16.5(range, 9.0-30.0)days. During the follow‑up period, there was no significant difference in pain, seroma, incisional infection, readmission within 30 days after surgery getween two groups (P>0.05). No serious thrombotic events occurred in either group of patients, and no patient died.
    Conclusion Compared with patients who discontinued antiplatelet agents alone before surgery, preoperative low molecular weight heparin bridging therapy after discontinua-tion of medication is safe and feasible for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair who with long-term oral antiplatelet agents, in additon to less plasma drainage tubes using during the operation and without more risk of bleeding, but more postoperative pain.

     

/

返回文章
返回