腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合不同胃底折叠术的疗效分析

Efficacy of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair combined with different fundoplication techniques

  • 摘要:
    探讨腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术(LHHR)联合Nissen、Toupet或Dor胃底折叠术的临床疗效。
    采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2019年1月至2023年12月甘肃省中心医院等全国4家医学中心收治的102例食管裂孔疝(HH)患者的临床资料;男46例,女56例;年龄为(54±4)岁。102例患者中,37例行LHHR联合Nissen胃底折叠术,设为Nissen组;34例行LHHR联合Toupet胃底折叠术,设为Toupet组;31例行LHHR联合Dor胃底折叠术,设为Dor组。观察指标:(1)手术及术后恢复情况。(2)手术前后吞咽困难情况。(3)手术前后胃食管反流病量表(GERD‑Q)评分。正态分布的计量资料组间比较采用单因素方差分析。在方差分析中,若各组间差异有统计学意义,则进一步采用LSD法进行两两比较。重复测量资料采用重复测量方差分析。计数资料多组间比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法,两两比较采用Dunn⁃Bonferroni校正。等级资料组间比较采用Kruskal‑Wallis H检验。
    (1)手术及术后恢复情况。3组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门首次排气时间、总住院时间、术后住院期间吞咽困难、腹胀、腹痛及腹泻比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后12个月,Nissen组无患者疝复发,Toupet组1例复发,Dor组1例复发,3组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(2)手术前后吞咽困难情况。术前3组患者吞咽困难发生情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1个月Nissen组、Toupet组、Dor组患者吞咽困难分别为20、18、7例,3组比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.39,P<0.05),其中Nissen组与Toupet组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);Nissen组、Toupet组分别与Dor组比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=6.98、6.32,P<0.05)。术后6、12个月3组患者吞咽困难发生情况比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(3)手术前后GERD‑Q评分。Nissen组患者术前、术后1个月、术后6个月GERD‑Q评分分别为(10.8±1.9)分、(8.5±2.1)分、(7.1±1.9)分,Toupet组患者分别为(11.0±1.6)分、(8.6±1.9)分、(7.1±1.7)分,Dor组患者分别为(10.7±1.6)分、(8.7±1.9)分、(7.2±1.8)分。3组患者手术前后GERD‑Q评分的时间效应显著(F=104.17,P<0.05),组间效应和交互效应均不显著(F=0.13、0.16,P>0.05)。3组患者术前、术后1个月、术后6个月GERD‑Q评分组内比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=38.37、40.29、27.20,P<0.05)。
    LHHR联合Nissen、Toupet或Dor胃底折叠术治疗HH均安全、有效,且能取得良好的抗反流效果。Dor胃底折叠术后短期吞咽困难发生比例更低。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (LHHR) combined with Nissen, Toupet, or Dor fundoplication.
    Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 102 hiatal hernia patients who were admitted to 4 hospitals including Gansu Provincial Central Hospital from January 2019 to December 2023 were collected. There were 46 males and 56 females, aged (54±4)years. Among the 102 patients, 37 cases who underwent LHHR combined with Nissen fundoplication were assigned to the Nissen group, 34 cases who underwent LHHR combined with Toupet fundoplication were assigned to the Toupet group, and 31 cases who underwent LHHR combined with Dor fundoplication were assigned to the Dor group. Observation indicators: (1) surgical conditions and postoperative recovery; (2) dysphagia before and after surgery; (3) gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERD‑Q) scores before and after surgery. One‑way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparison of measurement data with normal distribution among groups. In ANOVA, if there were statistically significant differences among groups, the least significant difference (LSD) method was further used for pairwise compari-son. Repeated‑measures ANOVA was applied for comparison of repeated measure-ment data. Comparison of count data among multiple groups was conducetd using the chi‑square test or Fisher exact probability, and the Dunn-Bonferroni correction was used for further pairwise comparison. Comparison of ranked data between groups was conducted using the Kruskal‑Wallis H test.
    Results (1) Surgical conditions and postoperative recovery. There was no significant difference in operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, time to postoperative first flatus, length of hospital stay, or the incidence of postoperative in‑hospital dysphagia, abdominal distension, abdominal pain, diarrhea among the three groups (P>0.05). At 12 months after surgery, there was no hernia recurrence in the Nissen group, 1 case of recurrence in the Toupet group, and 1 case of recurrence in the Dor group, showing no significant difference among the three groups (P>0.05). (2) Dysphagia before and after surgery. Before surgery, there was no significant difference in the incidence of dysphagia among the three groups (P>0.05). At 1 month after surgery, the number of patients with dysphagia in the Nissen group, Toupet group, and Dor group was 20, 18, and 7, respectively, showing a significant difference among the three groups (χ²=8.39, P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the Nissen group and Toupet group (P>0.05). There was a significant difference between the Nissen group and Dor group, between the Toupet group and Dor group (χ²=6.98, 6.32, P<0.05). However, at 6 and 12 months after surgery, there was no significant difference in the incidence of dysphagia among the three groups (P>0.05). (3) GERD‑Q scores before and after surgery. The GERD‑Q scores before surgery, at 1 month and 6 months after surgery were 10.8±1.9, 8.5±2.1, 7.1±1.9 of the Nissen group, 11.0±1.6, 8.6±1.9, and 7.1±1.7 of the Toupet group, 10.7±1.6, 8.7±1.9, 7.2±1.8 of the Dor group, respectively. For the GERD‑Q scores of the three groups before and after surgery, there was a significant difference in the time effect (F=104.17, P<0.05), while no significant difference was found in the inter‑group effect and interaction effect (F=0.13, 0.16, P>0.05). Intra-group comparison of GERD‑Q scores in the three groups before surgery, at 1 month and 6 months after surgery showed significant differences respectively (F=38.37, 40.29, 27.20, P<0.05).
    Conclusions LHHR combined with Nissen, Toupet, or Dor fundoplication is safe and effective in the treatment of hiatal hernia , which can achieve good anti‑reflux effects. The Dor fundoplication is associated with a lower short‑term incidence of postoperative dysphagia.

     

/

返回文章
返回