青年肥胖患者继发2型糖尿病风险预测模型构建及验证

Construction and validation of a risk prediction model for secondary type 2 diabetes in young obesity patients

  • 摘要:
    探讨青年肥胖患者继发2型糖尿病(T2DM)的影响因素,构建并验证风险预测模型。
    采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2022年1月至2024年7月南京医科大学第一附属医院收治的847例青年肥胖患者的临床资料;男382例,女465例,年龄为(29.4±3.8)岁。采用随机数字表法按照7∶3比例分为训练集593例和验证集254例,训练集用于构建预测模型,验证集用于验证模型效能。观察指标:(1)青年肥胖患者继发T2DM影响因素分析。(2)青年肥胖患者继发T2DM预测模型构建及验证。正态分布的计量资料组间比较采用独立样本t检验;偏态分布的计量资料组间比较采用Mann⁃Whitney U检验。计数资料组间比较采用χ²检验。单因素分析根据资料类型选择对应的统计学方法。多因素分析采用Logistic回归模型。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、Hosmer‑Lemeshow检验、校准曲线和决策曲线分析评价模型的预测效能。
    (1)青年肥胖患者继发T2DM影响因素分析。847例青年肥胖患者中,继发T2DM 238例(训练集161例、验证集77例),单纯肥胖609例(训练集432例、验证集177例)。多因素分析结果显示:糖尿病家族史、高血压、高糖饮食、运动习惯、甘油三酯、胰岛素抵抗指数、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值是训练集青年肥胖患者继发T2DM的独立影响因素优势比=9.476、2.420、3.219、0.272、2.137、26.759、41.535,95%可信区间(CI)为3.242~27.696、1.159~5.052、1.525~6.796、0.117~0.632、1.019~4.481、12.907~55.476、16.085~107.251,P<0.05。(2)青年肥胖患者继发T2DM预测模型构建及验证。根据多因素分析结果构建青年肥胖患者继发T2DM的列线图预测模型。受试者工作特征曲线显示:预测模型训练集的AUC为0.963(95%CI为0.946~0.980),灵敏度为89.6%,特异度为93.2%;验证集上述指标分别为0.966(95%CI为0.944~0.988)、92.7%、88.3%。Hosmer⁃Lemeshow检验结果显示:训练集和验证集P均>0.05,模型拟合良好。预测模型训练集和验证集的校准曲线与实际曲线基本吻合,模拟拟合良好。决策曲线显示模型实用价值高。
    糖尿病家族史、高血压、高糖饮食、运动习惯、甘油三酯、胰岛素抵抗指数、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值是青年肥胖患者继发T2DM的独立影响因素,基于此构建的预测模型具备良好的预测性能。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the influencing factors of secondary type 2 diabetes in young obesity patients, and construct and validate a risk prediction model.
    Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 847 young obesity patients who were admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2022 to July 2024 were collected. There were 382 males and 465 females, aged (29.4±3.8)years. Patients were randomly divided into a training set of 593 cases and a validation set of 254 cases based on a random number table method of 7∶3 ratio. The training set was used to construct the prediction model, and the validation set was used to validate prediction model. Observation indicators: (1) analysis of influencing factors of secondary type 2 diabetes in young obesity patients; (2) construc-tion and validation of a prediction model for secondary type 2 diabetes in young obesity patients. Comparison of measurement data with normal distribution between groups was conducted using the independent sample t test. Comparison of measurement data with skewed distribution between groups was conducted using the Mann‑Whitney U test. Comparison of count data between groups was conducted using the chi‑square test. Univariate analysis was performed using the corresponding statistical methods based on data types. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Logistic regression model, and the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the Hosmer‑Lemeshow test, the calibration curve and decision curve were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the model.
    Results (1) Analysis of influencing factors of secondary type 2 diabetes in young obesity patients. Of the 847 young obesity patients, there were 238 patients with secondary type 2 diabetes, including 161 cases in the training set and 77 cases in the validation set, 609 patients of simple obesity, including 432 cases in the training set and 177 cases in the validation set. Results of multivariate analysis showed that family history of diabetes, hypertension, high‑sugar diet, exercise habits, triglyceride (TG), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA‑IR) and neutrophil‑to‑lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were independent factors influencing secondary type 2 diabetes in young obesity patients odds ratio=9.476, 2.420, 3.219, 0.272, 2.137, 26.759, 41.535, 95% confidence interval (CI) as 3.242-27.696, 1.159-5.052, 1.525-6.796, 0.117-0.632, 1.019-4.481, 12.907-55.476, 16.085-107.251, P<0.05. (2) Construction and validation of a prediction model for secondary type 2 diabetes in young obesity patients. A nomogram prediction model for secondary type 2 diabetes in young obesity patients was constructed based on the results of multivariate analysis. Results of ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC of prediction model for the training set was 0.963(95%CI as 0.946-0.980), with sensitivity of 89.6% and specificity of 93.2%, respectively, and the AUC of prediction model for the validation set was 0.966(95%CI as 0.944-0.988), with sensitivity of 92.7% and specificity of 88.3%, respectively. Results of Hosmer‑Lemeshow test showed that the P‑values for both the training set and validation set were >0.05, indicating good model fit. The calibration curves for both the training set and validation set closely matched the actual curve, demonstrating the prediction model with a good fit. The decision curve analysis showed high practical value of the model.
    Conclusions Family history of diabetes, hypertension, high‑sugar diet, exercise habits, TG, HOMA‑IR and NLR are independent factors influencing secondary type 2 diabetes in young obesity patients. The prediction model constructed based on these factors demons-trates good predictive performance.

     

/

返回文章
返回