新辅助放化疗联合免疫治疗病理学完全缓解局部进展期直肠癌患者临床特征分析的全国多中心研究

Clinical characteristics of locally advanced rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy: a national multicenter study

  • 摘要:
    探讨新辅助放化疗联合免疫治疗病理学完全缓解(pCR)局部进展期直肠癌患者的临床特征。
    采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2021年6月至2022年11月首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院等全国6家医学中心收治的46例局部进展期直肠癌患者的临床病理资料;男29例,女17例;年龄为(61±4)岁。患者均行新辅助放化疗联合免疫检查点抑制剂治疗,放疗结束后6~12周行根治性全直肠系膜切除术。观察指标:(1)pCR和非pCR患者临床病理特征比较。(2)pCR和非pCR患者术后并发症及不良反应情况。正态分布的计量资料组间比较采用t检验。偏态分布的计量资料组间比较采用Mann‑Whitney U检验。计数资料组间比较采用χ²检验或Fisher确切概率法,等级资料组间比较采用Mann‑Whitney U检验。
    (1)pCR和非pCR患者临床病理特征比较。新辅助治疗前,pCR患者≥50岁、<50岁分别为14、6例;非pCR患者上述指标分别为25、1例;两者比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。新辅助治疗后,pCR患者临床T分期T0期、T1期、T2期、T3期、T4期分别为11、1、5、3、0例,肿瘤退缩分级1级、2级、3级、4级分别为11、8、1、0例,新辅助直肠评分分级低危、中危、高危分别为20、0、0例;非pCR患者上述指标分别为7、4、2、11、2例,7、14、4、1例,4、18、4例;两者比较,差异均有统计学意义(Z=-2.256,-2.104,-5.458,P<0.05)。(2)pCR和非pCR患者术后并发症及不良反应情况。pCR和非pCR患者术后发生并发症分别为2例和5例,术后发生不良反应分别为11例和10例,两者比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
    与≥50岁局部进展期直肠癌患者比较,<50岁患者行新辅助放化疗联合免疫治疗显著获益;新辅助治疗后临床T分期及核磁肿瘤退缩分级对于pCR患者具有预测价值。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To analyze the clinical characteristics of locally advanced rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy.
    Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopatholo-gical data of 46 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who were admitted to 6 medical centers, including Beijing Friendship Hospital of Capital Medical University et al, from June 2021 to November 2022 were collected. There were 29 males and 17 females, aged (61±4)years. Patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, and under-went radical total mesorectal excision during 6-12 weeks after radiotherapy. Observation indicators: (1) comparison of clinical characteristics between pCR and non-pCR patients;(2) postoperative complications and adverse reactions of pCR and non-pCR patients. Comparison of measurement data with normal distribution between groups was conducted using the t test. Comparison of measurement data with skewed distribution between groups was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test. Comparison of count data between groups was conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. Comparison of ordinal data between groups was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test.
    Results (1) Comparison of clinical characteristics between pCR and non-pCR patients. Before neoadjuvant therapy, there were 14 cases aged ≥50 years and 6 cases aged <50 years in pCR patients, versus 25 cases and 1 case in non-pCR patients, showing a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). After neoadjuvant therapy, cases in clinical stage T0, T1, T2, T3, T4 were 11, 1, 5, 3, 0 for pCR patients versus 7, 4, 2, 11, 2 for non-pCR patients, cases of tumor regression grade 1, 2, 3, 4 were 11, 8, 1, 0 for pCR patients versus 7, 14, 4, 1 for non-pCR patients, cases in low-risk, medium-risk, high-risk of neoadjuvant rectal scoring and grading were 20, 0, 0 for pCR patients versus 4, 18, 4 for non-pCR patients, respectively, showing significant differences in above indicators between the two groups (Z=-2.256, -2.104, -5.458, P<0.05). (2) Postoperative complications and adverse reactions of pCR and non-pCR patients. Postoperative complications occurred in 2 cases of pCR patients and 5 cases of non-pCR patients, postoperative adverse reactions occurred in 11 cases of pCR patients and 10 cases of non-pCR patients, showing no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).
    Conclusion Compared with locally advanced rectal cancer patients aged ≥50 years, those aged <50 years have significant benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy. Clinical T staging and magnetic resonance imaging-detected tumor regression grade after neoadjuvant therapy have predictive value for patients with pCR .

     

/

返回文章
返回