胆道神经内分泌肿瘤临床病理特征及预后影响因素分析

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors analysis of biliary neuroendocrine neoplasms

  • 摘要:
    探讨胆道神经内分泌肿瘤(NENs)的临床病理特征及预后影响因素。
    采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2013年1月至2023年12月吉林大学第一医院收治的36例经手术治疗的胆道NENs患者的临床病理资料;男22例,女14例;年龄为(59±9)岁。观察指标:(1)患者临床病理特征。(2)随访情况。(3)患者预后的影响因素分析。正态分布的计量资料多组间比较采用方差分析,偏态分布的计量资料多组间比较采用Kruskal‑Wallis H检验。计数资料组间比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。采用Kaplan‑Meier法计算生存率并绘制生存曲线,Log‑rank检验进行生存分析。采用Cox风险回归模型进行单因素和多因素分析。
    (1)患者临床病理特征。36例胆道NENs患者均未出现类癌综合征,其中肿瘤位于胆囊11例,位于胆管14例,位于Vater壶腹11例。不同部位胆道NENs患者体质量下降和TNM分期比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ²=9.14、6.54,P<0.05)。36例患者中,神经内分泌瘤12例,神经内分泌癌16例、混合性神经内分泌‑非神经内分泌肿瘤8例。(2)随访情况。36例患者均获得随访,随访时间为39(10~93)个月。36例患者中,复发19例;转移16例。死亡18例。36例患者中位生存时间为30个月;1、2、3年总生存率分别为63.9%、51.0%、35.7%;1、2、3年无复发生存率分别为47.5%、34.1%、21.3%。19例复发患者的1、2、3年总生存率分别为55.6%、55.6%、27.8%,17例无复发患者的1、2、3年总生存率分别为71.3%、50.4%、42.0%,两者比较,差异无统计学意义(χ²=0.24,P>0.05)。(3)患者预后的影响因素分析。多因素分析结果显示:病理学类型为神经内分泌癌、混合性神经内分泌‑非神经内分泌肿瘤和非R0切缘是影响患者总生存时间的独立危险因素(风险比=5.50、5.33、14.04,95%可信区间为1.32~23.01、1.17~24.35、2.67~73.79,P<0.05)。
    胆道NENs缺乏特异性临床表现;分化不良的神经内分泌癌是常见的病理学类型,其病理学类型为神经内分泌癌、混合性神经内分泌‑非神经内分泌肿瘤和非R0切缘是影响患者预后的独立危险因素。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of biliary neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs).
    Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 36 patients who underwent surgical treatment for biliary NENs at The First Hospital of Jilin University from January 2013 to December 2023 were collected. There were 22 males and 14 females, aged (59±9)years. Observation indicators: (1) clinicopatholo-gical characteristics of patients; (2) follow‑up; (3) prognostic factors analysis of patients. Compari-son of measurement data with normal distribution among multiple groups was conducted using the ANOVA. Comparison of measurement data with skewed distribution among multiple groups was conducted using the Kruskal‑Wallis H test. Comparison of count data between groups was conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. The Kaplan‑Meier method was used to calculate survival rate and plot survival curve, and Log‑rank test was used for survival analysis. The Cox risk regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses.
    Results (1) Clinicopatholo-gical characteristics of patients. None of the 36 patients with biliary NENs had carcinoid syndrome. There were 11 cases with tumor located at gallbladder, 14 cases with tumor located at bile duct, and 11 cases with tumor located at ampulla of Vater. There were significant differences in weight loss and TNM stage among biliary NENs patients with different tumor location (χ²=9.14, 6.54, P<0.05). Of the 36 patients, there were 12 cases with neuroendocrine tumors, 16 cases with neuroendocrine carcinomas, and 8 cases with mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms. (2) Follow‑up. All 36 patients were followed up for 39(range, 10-93)months. Of the 36 patients, 19 patients experienced tumor recurrence and 16 patients experienced tumor metastasis. There were 18 patients died. The median overall survival time of 36 patients was 30 months, with the 1‑, 2‑, 3‑year overall survival rates of 63.9%, 51.0%, and 35.7%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, 3-year recurrence-free survival rates were 47.5%, 34.1% and 21.3%, respectively. The 1‑, 2‑, 3‑year overall survival rates of 19 patients with tumor recurrence were 55.6%, 55.6% and 27.8%, respectively. The 1‑, 2‑, 3‑year overall survival rates of 17 patients without tumor recurrence were 71.3%, 50.4% and 42.0%, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall survival between patients with and without tumor recurrence (χ²=0.24, P>0.05). (3) Prognostic factors analysis of patients. Results of multivariate analysis showed that pathological type as neuroendocrine carcinomas and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms, non‑R0 margin were independent risk factors influencing overall survival time of patients (hazard ratio=5.50, 5.33, 14.04, 95% confidence interval as 1.32-23.01, 1.17-24.35, 2.67-73.79, P<0.05).
    Conclusions Biliary NENs lack specific clinical manifestations. Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas are the most common pathological type. Pathological type as neuroendocrine carcinomas and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms, non‑R0 margin are independent risk factors influencing prognosis of patients.

     

/

返回文章
返回