中低位直肠癌初诊及新辅助治疗后评估完成度分析:全国多中心真实世界研究

Analysis of completion rate of tumor evaluation at initial assessment and after neoadjuvant therapy for mid and low rectal cancer : a national multicenter real‑world study

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨全国多中心、真实世界中低位直肠癌患者初诊和新辅助治疗后肿瘤评估的完成度。
    方法 采用前瞻性真实世界研究方法。收集2023年5月12日至2024年5月11日北京协和医院等全国47家医学中心行手术治疗的1 074例中低位直肠癌患者的临床病理资料。观察指标:(1)中低位直肠癌患者的临床特征。(2)中低位直肠癌患者初诊肿瘤肠镜及病理学评估。(3)中低位直肠癌患者初诊肿瘤影像学评估。(4)中低位直肠癌患者新辅助治疗后肿瘤影像学评估。正态分布的计量资料以x±s表示,偏态分布的计量资料以MQ1,Q3)表示。计数资料以绝对数和(或)百分比表示。
    结果 (1)中低位直肠癌患者的临床特征。1 074例患者中,男713例,女361例;年龄为63(56,70)岁;体质量指数为24(21,26)kg/m2。美国麻醉医师学会分级:Ⅰ级147例,Ⅱ级641例,Ⅲ级157例,Ⅳ级2例,缺失127例。(2)中低位直肠癌患者初诊肿瘤肠镜及病理学评估。1 074例患者中,行全程肠镜检查787例(73.28%);行全部4项错配修复蛋白免疫组织化学染色检测评估仅197例(18.34%)。(3)中低位直肠癌患者初诊肿瘤影像学评估。1 074例患者中,完成直肠磁共振成像或超声检查评估842例(78.40%),完成胸腹盆腔增强CT检查评估914例(85.10%)。149例行直肠超声检查评估患者中,完成T分期和N分期评估分别为122例(81.88%)和81例(54.36%)。808例行直肠磁共振成像检查评估患者中,完成T分期和N分期评估分别为708例(87.62%)和590例(73.02%)。(4)中低位直肠癌患者新辅助治疗后肿瘤影像学评估。388例行新辅助治疗患者中,完成直肠磁共振成像或超声检查评估332例(85.57%),完成胸腹盆腔增强CT检查评估327例(84.28%)。70例行直肠超声检查评估患者中,完成T分期和N分期评估分别为65例(92.86%)和49例(70.00%)。327例行直肠磁共振成像检查评估患者中,完成T分期和N分期评估分别为246例(75.23%)和228例(69.72%)。
    结论 全国范围内中低位直肠癌患者初诊及新辅助治疗后肿瘤的影像学评估完成度较好。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the completion rate of tumor evaluation at initial assessment and after neoadjuvant therapy for mid and low rectal cancer patients in the national multicenter real‑world database.
    Methods The prospective real‑world study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 1 074 patients who underwent surgical treatment for mid and low rectal cancer in 47 national medical institutions, including Peking Union Medical College Hospital et al, from May 12,2023 to May 11,2024 were collected. Observation indicators: (1) clinical characteristics of patients with mid and low rectal cancer; (2) initial colonoscopy and pathologic evaluation of tumors in patients with mid and low rectal cancer; (3) initial imaging evaluation of patients with mid and low rectal cancer; (4) imaging evaluation after neoadjuvant therapy for patients with mid and low rectal cancer. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD, and measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(Q1,Q3). Count data were described as absoluter numbers and/or percentages.
    Results (1) Clinical characteristics of patients with mid and low rectal cancer. Of the 1 074 patients, there were 713 males and 361 females, aged 63(56,70)years. The body mass index of 1 074 patients was 24(21,26)kg/m2.For American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, there were 147 cases of stage Ⅰ, 641 cases of stage Ⅱ, 157 cases of stage Ⅲ, 2 cases of stage Ⅳ, and there were 127 cases missing data. (2) Initial colonoscopy and pathologic evaluation of tumors in patients with mid and low rectal cancer. Of the 1 074 patients, there were 787 cases (73.28%) undergoing complete colonoscopy, and there were only 197 cases (18.34%) undergoing immunohistochemical evaluation of all four mismatch repair proteins. (3) Initial imaging evaluation of patients with mid and low rectal cancer. Of the 1 074 patients, there were 842(78.40%) patients completing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound evaluation, and there were 914(85.10%) patients completing chest, abdomen, and pelvis enhanced computed tomography (CT) evaluation. In the 149 patients completing rectal ultrasound evaluation, there were 122 cases (81.88%) comple-ting T staging evaluation, and there were 81 cases (54.36%) completing N staging evaluation. In the 808 patients completing rectal MRI evaluation, there were 708 cases (87.62%) completing T staging evaluation, and there were 590 cases (73.02%) completing N staging evaluation. (4) Imaging evalua-tion after neoadjuvant therapy for patients with mid and low rectal cancer. Of the 388 patients with neoadjuvant therapy, there were 332 patients (85.57%) completing MRI or ultrasound evaluation, and there were 327 patients (84.28%) completing chest, abdomen, and pelvis enhanced CT evalua-tion. In the 70 patients completing rectal ultrasound evaluation, there were 65 cases (92.86%) com-pleting T staging evaluation, and there were 49 cases (70.00%) completing N staging evaluation. In the 327 patients completing rectal MRI evaluation, there were 246 cases (75.23%) completing T staging, and there were 228 cases (69.72%) completing N staging evaluation.
    Conclusion The com-pletion rate of tumor imaging evaluation at initial assessment and after neoadjuvant therapy for mid and low rectal cancer patients on a national scale is relatively good.

     

/

返回文章
返回