腹腔开放疗法用于非创伤重症患者临床价值的多中心回顾性研究

Clinical value of open abdomen therapy in non‑traumatic critically patients: a multicenter retrospective study

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨腹腔开放疗法用于非创伤重症患者的临床价值。
    方法 采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2015年7月至2024年7月我国北京医院等5家医学中心收治的23例行腹腔开放疗法非创伤重症患者的临床资料;男17例,女6例;年龄为70(24~84)岁。正态分布的计量资料以x±s表示,偏态分布的计量资料以M(范围)表示,计数资料以绝对数表示。重复测量数据采用重复测量方差分析,组内两两比较采用最小显著差异法。应用Boruta算法进行生存结局相关变量分析。
    结果 (1)行腹腔开放疗法患者的治疗情况。①23例患者术前至术后第3天腹内压、乳酸、心率、中心静脉压、平均动脉压、序贯器官衰竭评分分别由(19.7±5.4)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)、(6.1±1.9)mmol/L、(120±14)次/min、(13.1±4.3)cmH2O(1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa)、(58.8±6.8)mmHg、(13.2±1.8)分变化至(10.6±1.3)mmHg、(2.3±0.6)mmol/L、(95±10)次/min、(8.8±2.0)cmH2O、(75.2±8.5)mmHg、(10.1±1.6)分,上述指标变化趋势时间效应比较,差异均有统计学意义(F时间=46.40,29.19,24.91,11.84,27.81,11.71,P<0.05)。②23例患者术前至术后第3天氧合指数、总入量、总出量分别由(255.0±54.2)mmHg、(5 388±1 562)mL、(2 520±630)mL变化至(291.7±25.0)mmHg、(2 886±866)mL、(3 221±923)mL,上述指标变化趋势时间效应比较,差异均有统计学意义(F时间=7.61,13.83,2.97,P<0.05)。③23例患者术后第1天至第3天每日补充热卡量、每日补充蛋白质分别由(465±116)kcal、(18±5)g变化至(1 628±472)kcal、(60±18)g,上述指标变化趋势时间效应比较,差异均有统计学意义(F时间=40.31,41.23,P<0.05)。(2)行腹腔开放疗法患者的治疗结局。23例患者中,生存18例、死亡5例。23例患者重症医学科入住时间为26(5~82)d,总住院时间为40(5~98)d。23例患者中,12例接受肾脏替代治疗,治疗时间为12(5~32)d。23例患者均进行镇痛镇静治疗、机械通气治疗、抗菌药物治疗、血管活性药物治疗,治疗时间分别为13(5~74)、12(5~74)、20(5~50)、6(2~35)d。(3)行腹腔开放疗法患者的生存结局相关变量分析。Boruta分析结果显示:术后高位肠瘘、术后胆瘘、术后腹腔出血、术后肠空气瘘、术前平均动脉压与患者生存结局显著相关。
    结论 腹腔开放疗法治疗非创伤重症患者是有效的。术后高位肠瘘、胆瘘、腹腔出血、肠空气瘘及术前平均动脉压降低与生存结局显著相关。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the clinical value of open abdomen therapy in non⁃traumatic critically patients.
    Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 23 non‑traumatic critically patients who underwent open abdomen therapy in 5 hospitals in China from July 2015 to July 2024 were collected. There were 17 males and 6 females, aged 70(range, 24-84)years. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD, and measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(range). Count data were described as absolute numbers. Repeated measurement data were analyzed using the repeated ANOVA, and pairwise comparison within groups was conducted using the least significant difference method. The Boruta algorithm was applied for analyzing variables related to survival outcomes.
    Results (1) Treatment of patients undergoing open abdomen therapy. ① The intra‑abdominal pressure, lactate, heart rate, central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, sequential organ failure assessment score of 23 patients from preoperation to postoperative day 3 were changed from (19.7±5.4)mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), (6.1±1.9)mmol/L, (120±14)beats/minutes, (13.1±4.3)cmH2O (1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa), (58.8±6.8)mmHg, 13.2±1.8 to (10.6±1.3)mmHg, (2.3±0.6)mmol/L, (95±10)beats/minutes, (8.8±2.0)cmH2O, (75.2±8.5)mmHg, 10.1±1.6, respectively, showing significant differences in the time effect of changes in the above indicators (Ftime=46.40, 29.19, 24.91, 11.84, 27.81, 11.71, P<0.05). ② The oxygenation index, total intake, total output of 23 patients from preoperation to postoperative day 3 were changed from (255.0±54.2)mmHg, (5388±1562)mL, (2 520±630)mL to (291.7±25.0)mmHg, (2 886±866)mL, (3 221±923)mL, respectively, showing significant differences in the time effect of changes in the above indicators (Ftime=7.61, 13.83, 2.97, P<0.05). ③The daily caloric intake, daily protein supplementation of 23 patients from preoperation to postoperative day 3 were changed from (465±116)kcal, (18±5)g to (1 628±472)kcal, (60±18)g, respectively, showing significant differences in the time effect of changes in the above indicators (Ftime=40.31, 41.23, P<0.05). (2) Patients outcomes after open abdomen therapy. Of 23 patients, 18 cases survived and 5 cases died. The duration of intensive care unit stay and duration of hospital stay of 23 patients were 26(range, 5-82)days and 40(range, 5-98)days. Twelve of 23 patients received renal replacement therapy for 12 (range, 5-32)days. Time of pain and sedation management, mechanical ventilation, antimicrobial therapy, vasopressor therapy of 23 patients were 13(range, 5-74)days, 12(range, 5-74)days,20(range, 5-50)days, 6(range, 2-35)days. (3) Analysis of variables related to survival outcomes for patients after open abdomen therapy. Results of Boruta analysis showed that postoperative high‑output enteric fistula, postoperative bile fistula, postoperative intra‑abdominal hemorrhage, postoperative enteric air fistula, and preoperative mean arterial pressure were significantly associated with survival outcomes.
    Conclusions Open abdomen therapy is effective in the treatment of non-traumatic critically patients. Postoperative high‑output enteric fistula, postoperative bile fistula, postoperative intra‑abdominal hemorrhage, postoperative enteric air fistula, and preoperative mean arterial pressure reduction are significantly associated with survival outcomes.

     

/

返回文章
返回