原位肝移植后发生早期急性肾损伤危险因素及预后分析

Analysis of risk factors and prognosis for early acute kidney injury after orthotopic liver trans-plantation

  • 摘要:
    目的 分析原位肝移植后发生早期急性肾损伤(AKI)的危险因素和预后。
    方法 采用回顾性研究方法。收集2016年1月至2020年1月南京医科大学第一附属医院收治的340对行原位肝移植供者及受者的临床病理资料;供者男262例,女78例;受者男268例,女72例,年龄为(51±11)岁。340例受者中,217例术后未发生早期AKI设为非AKI组,123例术后发生早期AKI设为AKI组。正态分布的计量资料以x±s表示,组间比较采用独立样本t检验。偏态分布的计量资料以MIQR)表示,组间比较采用Mann‑Whitney U检验。计数资料以绝对数或百分比表示,组间比较采用χ²检验。等级资料比较采用非参数检验。多因素分析采用二元Logistic回归模型前进法。采用R软件及其RMS软件包(R3.6.1)构建列线图预测模型。采用受试者工作特征曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)验证预测模型的效能,Bootstrap法对预测模型进行内部验证。采用Kaplan‑Meier法绘制生存曲线,Log‑rank检验进行生存分析。
    结果 (1)非AKI组和AKI组供者及受者术前临床特征比较。非AKI组和AKI组供者超重比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。非AKI组和AKI组受者术前高血压、病毒性肝炎、病理学类型、国际标准化比值、纤维蛋白原、血小板、血红蛋白、贫血比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(2)非AKI组和AKI组受者手术情况比较。非AKI组和AKI组受者术中尿量、术中出血量、灌注后血清钾峰值、大量输血、术中输注血浆、术中输注冷沉淀、使用氨甲环酸比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(3)术后发生早期AKI的影响因素和列线图预测模型的构建及评价。多因素分析结果显示:供者超重,受者术前高血压、非病毒性肝炎、术前血小板重度减少、术中尿量、灌注后严重低血压、灌注后血清钾峰值、术中输注血浆是术后发生早期AKI的独立危险因素(优势比=1.982,3.365,0.519,3.615,0.169,2.480,1.500,1.001,95%可信区间为1.160~3.388,1.649~6.865,0.293~0.917,1.358~9.621,0.061~0.464,1.246~4.934,1.003~2.243,1.000~1.001,P<0.05)。根据多因素分析结果,构建术后发生早期AKI列线图预测模型。受试者工作特征曲线结果显示:AUC为0.769(95%可信区间为0.717~0.820)。校准曲线结果显示:列线图预测结果与实际情况拟合良好,平均绝对误差=0.016。(4)非AKI组和AKI组受者预后情况比较。非AKI组和AKI组受者术后降钙素原峰值、B型脑钠肽峰值、重症监护室时间、机械通气时间、再插管比较,差异均有统计学意义(Z=-4.836,-5.652,-5.861,-6.533,χ²=14.676,P<0.05)。340例受者均获得随访,其中肝细胞癌受者中,非AKI组和AKI组术后6个月生存率分别为87.8%和75.6%,两者比较,差异有统计学意义(χ²=4.010,P<0.05),总生存率分别为46.7%和56.1%,两者比较,差异无统计学意义(χ²=0.047,P>0.05);良性肝病受者中,非AKI组和AKI组术后6个月生存率分别为89.8%和78.0%,两者比较,差异有统计学意义(χ²=6.401,P<0.05),总生存率分别为81.4%和68.0%,两者比较,差异有统计学意义(χ²=4.452,P<0.05)。
    结论 供者超重,受者术前高血压、非病毒性肝炎、术前血小板重度减少、术中尿量、灌注后严重低血压、灌注后血清钾峰值高、术中输注血浆过多是原位肝移植受者术后发生早期AKI的独立危险因素;其列线图预测模型有较好临床应用价值。良性肝病受者中,非AKI组受者术后6个月生存率和总生存率均优于AKI组。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To analyze the risk factors and prognosis for early acute kidney injury (AKI) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).
    Methods The retrospective study was conduc-ted. The clinicopathological data of 340 pairs of donor and recipients undergoing OLT in The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2016 to January 2020 were collected. There were 262 males and 78 females of donors. There were 268 males and 72 females of recipients, aged (51±11)years. Of 340 recipients, 217 cases without postoperative early AKI were divided into the non-AKI group and 123 cases with postoperative early AKI were divided into the AKI group. Measure-ment data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD, and comparison between groups was conducted using the independent sample t test. Measurement data with skewed distri-bution were represented as M(IQR), and comparison between groups was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test. Count data were described as absolute numbers or percentages, and comparison between groups was conducted using the chi‑square test. Comparison of ordinal data was conducted using the non-parameter test. Multivariate analysis was conducted using the binary Logistic regre-ssion model with forward method. The nomogram predictive model was constructed using the R software with its RMS package (R3.6.1). The efficacy of the predictive model was validated using the area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and internal validation of the predictive model was performed using the Bootstrap method. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw survival curves, and Log‑rank test was used for survival analysis.
    Results (1) Com-parison of preoperative clinical characteristics between donors and recipients of the non‑AKI group and the AKI group. There was a significant difference in overweight of donors between the non‑AKI group and the AKI group (P<0.05). There were significant differences in preoperative hypertension, viral hepatitis, pathological types, international normalized ratio, fibrinogen levels, platelet (PLT), hemoglobin, and anemia of recipients between the non‑AKI group and the AKI group (P<0.05). (2) Comparison of surgical situations between recipients of the non‑AKI group and the AKI group. There were significant differences in intraoperative urine output, volume of intraoperative blood loss, peak serum potassium after reperfusion, massive transfusion, plasma infusion, cryoprecipitate infusion, and aminocaproic acid use of recipients between the non‑AKI group and the AKI group (P<0.05). (3) Influencing factors for postoperative early AKI and construction and evaluation of the nomogram predictive model for postoperative early AKI. Results of multivariate analysis showed that donors of overweight, recipients of preoperative hypertension, recipients of non‑viral hepatitis, recipients of preoperative severe PLT reduction, recipients of less intraoperative urine output, recipients of severe post‑reperfusion hypotension, recipients of high peak serum potassium after reperfusion, recipients with intraoperative plasma infusion were independent risk factors for postoperative early AKI (odds ratio=1.982, 3.365, 0.519, 3.615, 0.169, 2.480, 1.500, 1.001, 95% confidence interval as 1.160-3.388, 1.649-6.865, 0.293-0.917, 1.358-9.621, 0.061-0.464, 1.246-4.934, 1.003-2.243, 1.000-1.001, P<0.05). The nomogram predictive model for postoperative early AKI was constructed based on the results of multivariate analysis. Results of ROC curve showed the AUC was 0.769 (95% confidence interval as 0.717-0.820). Results of the calibration curve showed that the predictive results of nomogram predictive model fitted well with the actual situation, with a mean absolute error of 0.016. (4) Comparison of prognosis between recipients of the non‑AKI group and the AKI group. There were significant differences in postopera-tive peak creatinine, peak brain natriuretic peptide, duration of intensive care unit stay, mechanical ventilation time, re‑intubation of recipients between the non‑AKI group and the AKI group (Z=-4.836, -5.652, -5.861, -6.533, χ²=14.676, P<0.05). All 340 recipients were followed up. For recipients of hepatocellular carcinoma, the 6‑month survival rates after surgery were 87.8% and 75.6% of the non‑AKI group and the AKI group, respectively, showing a significant difference between them (χ²=4.010, P<0.05), and the overall survival rates were 46.7% and 56.1% of the non‑AKI group and the AKI group, respectively, showing no significant difference between them (χ²=0.047, P>0.05). For recipients of benign liver disease, the 6‑month survival rates after surgery were 89.8% and 78.0% of the non‑AKI group and the AKI group, respectively, showing a significant difference between them (χ²=6.401, P<0.05), and the overall survival rates were 81.4% and 68.0% of the non‑AKI group and the AKI group, respectively, showing a significant difference between them (χ²=4.452, P<0.05).
    Conclusions Donors of overweight, recipients of preoperative hypertension, recipients of non‑viral hepatitis, recipients of preoperative severe PLT reduction, reci-pients of less intraoperative urine output, recipients of severe post‑reperfusion hypotension, recipi-ents of high peak serum potassium after reperfusion, recipients with intraoperative plasma transfu-sion were independent risk factors for postoperative early AKI. Nomogram predictive model has well clinical application value. For recipients of benign liver disease, the 6‑month survival rate after surgery and overall survival rate of recipients in the non‑AKI group are superior to those of the AKI group.

     

/

返回文章
返回