淋巴结清扫对不同位置肝内胆管癌患者疗效的影响

Influence of lymphadenectomy on efficacy of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma at different locations

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨淋巴结清扫对不同位置肝内胆管癌(ICC)患者疗效的影响。
    方法 采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2015年1月至2022年1月川北医学院附属医院收治的123例ICC患者的临床病理资料;男78例,女45例;年龄为55(50~60)岁。所有患者行根治性切除术。观察指标:(1)ICC患者临床特征。(2)随访情况。(3)不同淋巴结清扫数目ICC患者的手术情况。正态分布的计量资料以x±s表示,组间比较采用独立样本t检验;偏态分布的计量资料以M(范围)表示,组间比较采用Mann⁃Whitney U检验。计数资料以绝对数或百分比表示,组间比较采用χ²检验。采用Kaplan‑Meier法绘制生存曲线,Log‑Rank检验进行生存分析。
    结果 (1)ICC患者临床特征。123例患者中,81例为周围型ICC,42例为中央型ICC。周围型ICC患者的白蛋白‑胆红素评分分级(1级、2~3级),术前淋巴结转移风险评估(低风险、高风险),淋巴结清扫数目(<6枚、≥6枚),淋巴结转移(有、无)分别为57、24例,51、30例,49、32例,15、66例;中央型ICC患者上述指标分别为19、23例,17、25例,14、28例,16、26例,两者比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ²=7.40,5.66,8.17,5.62,P<0.05)。(2)随访情况。123例患者均获得随访,随访时间为28(21~38)个月。81例周围型ICC和42例中央型ICC患者3年总生存率分别为57.8%和32.3%,两者比较,差异有统计学意义(χ²=5.98,P<0.05)。42例中央型ICC患者中,25例术前淋巴结转移评估高风险,17例术前淋巴结转移评估低风险。25例术前淋巴结转移评估高风险中央型ICC患者中,18例淋巴结清扫数目≥6枚和7例淋巴结清扫数目<6枚患者3年总生存率分别为28.9%和14.3%,两者比较,差异有统计学意义(χ²=8.90,P<0.05)。(3)不同淋巴结清扫数目ICC患者的手术情况。123例患者中,63例淋巴结清扫数目<6枚,60例淋巴结清扫数目≥6枚。淋巴结清扫数目<6枚和≥6枚ICC患者的手术时间、术中输血、术后总并发症、胆漏、肝功能不全、肺部感染、胸腔积液、腹腔积液、淋巴漏比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。同一例患者可合并多种并发症。
    结论 周围型ICC患者的预后优于中央型ICC患者;对于术前淋巴结转移评估高风险的中央型ICC患者,充分的淋巴结清扫可以使患者获得更佳预后。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the influence of lymphadenectomy on efficacy of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) at different locations.
    Methods The retro-spective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 123 patients with ICC who were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from January 2015 to January 2022 were collected. There were 78 males and 45 females, aged 55(rage, 50‒60)years. All patients underwent radical resection. Observation indicators: (1) clinical characteristics of patients with ICC; (2) follow-up; (3) surgical situations in ICC patients with different number of lymph nodes dissected. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD, and compari-son between groups was conducted using the independent sample t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(range), and comparison between groups was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test. Count data were described as absolute numbers or percentages, and comparison between groups was conducted using the chi-square test. Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw survival curve and Log-Rank test was used for survival analysis.
    Results (1) Clinical characteristics of patients with ICC. Of the 123 patients, 81 cases had peripheral ICC and 42 cases had central ICC. The albumin-bilirubin grade (grade 1, grade 2‒3), preoperative lymph node metastasis risk assessment (low risk, high risk), the number of lymph nodes dissected (<6, ≥6), lymph node metastasis (positive, negative) were 57, 24, 51, 30, 49, 32, 15, 66 in patients with peripheral ICC, versus 19, 23, 17, 25, 14, 28, 16, 26 in patients with central ICC, showing significant differences in the above indicators between them (χ2=7.40, 5.66, 8.17, 5.62, P<0.05). (2) Follow-up. All the 123 patients were followed up for 28(range, 21‒38)months. The 3-year overall survival rate was 57.8% in the 81 patients with peripheral ICC, versus 32.3% in the 42 patients with central ICC, showing a significant difference between them (χ2=5.98, P<0.05). Of the 42 patients with central ICC, there were 25 cases with high risk of lymph node metastasis before surgery and 17 cases with low risk of lymph node metastasis before surgery. Of the 25 central ICC patients with high risk of lymph node metastasis before surgery, the 3-year overall survival rate was 28.9% in the 18 cases with the number of lymph nodes dissected ≥6, versus 14.3% in the 7 cases with the number of lymph nodes dissected <6, showing a significant difference between them (χ2=8.90, P<0.05). (3) Surgical situa-tions in patients with the different number of lymph nodes dissected. Of the 123 patients, cases with the number of lymph nodes dissected <6 and ≥6 were 63 and 60, and there was no significant difference in the operation time, intraoperative blood transfusion, postoperative complications, bile leakage, liver insufficiency, pulmonary infection, pleural effusion, abdominal effusion, or lymphatic leakage between them (P>0.05). One patient might have multiple complications.
    Conclusions The prognosis of patients with peripheral ICC is better than that of patients with central ICC. For patients with central ICC who are at high risk of lymph node metastasis before surgery, adequate lymph node dissection may result in a better prognosis.

     

/

返回文章
返回