单人操作经口数字胆道镜在肝外胆管癌术前评估中的应用价值

Application value of digital single-operator peroral cholangioscopy on the preoperative evalua-tion of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

  • 摘要:
    目的 单人操作经口数字胆道镜在肝外胆管癌术前评估中的应用价值。
    方法 采用倾向性评分匹配及回顾性队列研究方法。收集2017年12月1日至2022年4月1日陆军军医大学第一附属医院收治的172例肝外胆管癌患者的临床病理资料;男91例,女81例;年龄为65(45,68)岁。172例患者中,36例术前行经口数字胆道镜检查设为试验组,136例术前未行经口数字胆道镜检查设为对照组。观察指标:(1)倾向评分匹配情况及匹配后两组患者一般资料比较。(2)手术情况。倾向评分匹配按1∶1最近邻匹配法匹配,卡钳值为0.02。正态分布的计量资料以x±s表示,组间比较采用t检验。偏态分布的计量资料以MQ1,Q3)表示,组间比较采用Mann⁃Whitney U检验。计数资料以绝对数或百分比表示,组间比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。等级资料比较采用秩和检验。
    结果 (1)172例患者中,60例配对成功,试验组和对照组各30例。倾向性评分匹配前试验组和对照组患者术前胆汁引流(有、无)分别为27、9例和62、74例,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.86,P<0.05)。倾向性评分匹配后试验组和对照组患者术前胆汁引流(有、无)分别为23、7例和23、7例,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.00,P>0.05)。消除术前胆汁引流因素混杂偏倚,具有可比性。(2)手术情况。倾向性评分匹配后试验组和对照组患者未行手术分别为10例和0例。两组患者手术根治性(R0、R1、R2)分别为16、0、4例和18、6、6例,两组上述指标比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.85,P<0.05)。
    结论 术前加行经口数字胆道镜可以提高肝外胆管癌R0切除率。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the application value of digital single-operator peroral cholangioscopy on the preoperative evaluation of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
    Methods The propensity score matching and retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 172 patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University from December 1, 2017 to April 1, 2022 were collected. There were 91 males and 81 females, aged 65(range, 45‒68)years. Of 172 patients, 36 cases undergoing preoperative digital single-operator peroral cholangioscopy examination were allocated into the experimental group, and 136 cases not undergoing preoperative digital single-operator peroral cholangioscopy examination were allocated into the control group. Observation indicators: (1) propensity score matching and comparison of general data of patients between the two groups after matching; (2) surgical conditions. Propensity score matching was done by the 1:1 nearest neighbor matching method and caliper setting as 0.02. Measurement data with normal distribution were expressed as Mean±SD, and t test was used for comparison between groups. Measurement data with skewed distribution were expressed as M(Q1,Q3), and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison between groups. Count data were expressed as absolute numbers or percentages, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. The rank sum test was used for comparison of ordinal data.
    Results (1) Propensity score matching and comparison of general data of patients between the two groups after matching. Of 172 patients, 60 cases were successfully matched, including 30 cases in the experiment group and 30 cases in the control group, respectively. Before propensity score matching, cases with or without preoperative bile drainage were 27, 9 in the experiment group, versus 62, 74 in the control group, showing a significant difference between the two groups (χ2=9.86, P<0.05). The above indicators were 23, 7 in the experiment group, and 23, 7 in the control group after propensity score matching, showing no significant difference between the two groups (χ2=0.00, P>0.05). The elimination of preoperative bile drainage confounding bias ensured comparability between the two groups. (2) Surgical conditions. After propensity score matching, there were 10 cases and 0 case without surgery in the two groups. Cases undergoing radical operation including R0, R1, R2 resection were 16, 0, 4 in the experiment group, versus 18, 6, 6 in the control group, showing a significant difference between the two groups (χ2=6.85, P<0.05).
    Conclusions Preoperative digital single-operator peroral cholangioscopy exami-nation can improve the R0 resection rate of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

     

/

返回文章
返回