中低位直肠癌患者第253组淋巴结转移特点及其影响因素分析(附2 316例报告)

Characteristics of No.253 lymph node metastasis in middle and low rectal cancer and its influencing factors: a report of 2 316 cases

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨中低位直肠癌患者第253组淋巴结转移特点及其影响因素。
    方法 采用回顾性病例对照研究方法。收集2013年1月至2021年10月南京医科大学第一附属医院收治的2 316例中低位直肠癌患者的临床病理资料;男1 339例,女977例;年龄为(61±12)岁。所有患者行直肠癌D3根治术。观察指标:(1)中低位直肠癌患者第253组淋巴结转移情况。(2)中低位直肠癌患者第253组淋巴结转移的影响因素分析。正态分布的计量资料以x±s表示。计数资料以绝对数和百分比表示,组间比较采用χ²检验。多因素分析采用Logistic回归模型。
    结果 (1)中低位直肠癌患者第253组淋巴结转移情况。2 316例患者中,128例第253组淋巴结阳性,2 188例第253组淋巴结阴性,淋巴结转移率为5.527%(128/2 316)。2 316例患者中,肿瘤下缘距肛缘距离为8~10 cm、≥6 cm且<8 cm、<6 cm的例数分别为568例、766例、982例。568例肿瘤下缘距肛缘距离为8~10 cm的直肠癌患者中,57例第253组淋巴结阳性,其中肿瘤分化程度为高、中、低分化患者分别为3例(5.263%)、9例(15.789%)、45例(78.948%);肿瘤TNM分期为Ⅰ期、Ⅱ期、Ⅲ期、Ⅳ期患者分别为0例、0例、20例(35.088%)、37例(64.912%)。766例肿瘤下缘距肛缘距离为≥6 cm且<8 cm的直肠癌患者中,42例第253组淋巴结阳性,其中肿瘤分化程度为高、中、低分化患者分别为4例(9.524%)、11例(26.190%)、27例(64.286%);肿瘤TNM分期为Ⅰ期、Ⅱ期、Ⅲ期、Ⅳ期患者分别为0例、0例、19例(45.238%)、23例(54.762%)。982例肿瘤下缘距肛缘距离<6 cm的直肠癌患者中,29例第253组淋巴结阳性,其中肿瘤分化程度为高、中、低分化患者分别为1例(3.448%)、3例(10.345%)、25例(86.207%);肿瘤TNM分期为Ⅰ期、Ⅱ期、Ⅲ期、Ⅳ期患者分别为0例、0例、12例(41.379%)、17例(58.621%)。(2)中低位直肠癌患者第253组淋巴结转移的影响因素分析。单因素分析结果显示:肿瘤T分期,肿瘤N分期,肿瘤TNM分期,肿瘤分化程度,肿瘤下缘距肛缘距离是影响中低位直肠癌患者第253组淋巴结转移的相关因素(χ²=28.48,44.58,172.62,227.67,34.57,P<0.05)。多因素分析结果显示:肿瘤T分期为T4期,肿瘤N分期为N2期,肿瘤TNM分期为Ⅳ期,肿瘤分化程度为低分化,肿瘤下缘距肛缘距离(≥6 cm且<8 cm、8~10 cm)是影响中低位直肠癌患者第253组淋巴结转移的独立危险因素(优势比=2.74,3.48,10.72,21.47,1.92、3.67,95%可信区间为1.91~3.92,2.42~4.98,7.36~15.62,10.33~44.60,1.27~2.91、2.31~5.81,P<0.05)。
    结论 肿瘤下缘距肛缘较远、肿瘤分化程度较低、肿瘤TNM分期较晚的中低位直肠癌患者第253组淋巴结转移风险较高。肿瘤T分期为T4期,肿瘤N分期为N2期,肿瘤TNM分期为Ⅳ期,肿瘤分化程度为低分化,肿瘤下缘距肛缘距离(≥6 cm且<8 cm、8~10 cm)是影响中低位直肠癌患者第253组淋巴结转移的独立危险因素。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the characteristics of No.253 lymph node metastasis in middle and low rectal cancer and its influencing factors.
    Methods The retrospective case-control study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 2 316 patients with middle and low rectal cancer who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2013 to October 2021 were collected. There were 1 339 males and 977 females, aged (61±12)years. All patients underwent D3 radical surgery for rectal cancer. Observation indicators: (1) No.253 lymph node metastasis in patients with middle and low rectal cancer; (2) analysis of influencing factors for No.253 lymph node metastasis in patients with middle and low rectal cancer. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD. Count data were expressed as absolute numbers and percentages, and comparison between groups was performed by the chi‑square test. Logistic regression model was used for multivariate analysis.
    Results (1) No.253 lymph node metastasis in patients with middle and low rectal cancer. There were 128 of 2 316 patients with positive No.253 lymph node and 2 188 cases with negative No.253 lymph node. The No.253 lymph node metastasis rate was 5.527%(128/2 316). There were 568 of 2 316 patients with the distance from distal margin of tumor to anal margin as 8‒10 cm, 766 cases as ≥6 cm and<8 cm, 982 cases as <6 cm. Of the 568 patients with the distance from distal margin of tumor to anal margin as 8‒10 cm, 57 cases had positive No.253 lymph node, including 3 cases(5.263%) of high differentiated tumor, 9 cases(15.789%) of moderate differentiated tumor, 45 cases(78.948%) of low differentiated tumor, respectively. There was 0 case of the above 57 patients with positive No.253 lymph node in TNM stage Ⅰ, 0 case in TNM stage Ⅱ, 20 cases(35.088%) in TNM stage Ⅲ, 37 cases(64.912%) in TNM stage Ⅳ, respectively. Of the 766 patients with the distance from distal margin of tumor to anal margin as ≥6 cm and <8 cm, 42 cases had positive No.253 lymph node, including 4 cases(9.524%) of high differentiated tumor, 11 cases(26.190%) of moderate differentiated tumor, 27 cases(64.286%) of low differentiated tumor, respectively. There was 0 case of the above 42 patients with positive No.253 lymph node in TNM stage Ⅰ, 0 case in TNM stage Ⅱ, 19 cases(45.238%) in TNM stage Ⅲ, 23 cases(54.762%) in TNM stage Ⅳ, respectively. Of the 982 patients with the distance from distal margin of tumor to anal margin as <6 cm, 29 cases had positive No.253 lymph node, including 1 case (3.448%) of high differentiated tumor, 3 cases (10.345%) of moderate differentiated tumor, 25 cases (86.207%) of low differentiated tumor, respectively. There was 0 case of the above 29 patients with positive No.253 lymph node in TNM stage Ⅰ, 0 case in TNM stage Ⅱ, 12 cases(41.379%) in TNM stage Ⅲ, 17 cases(58.621%) in TNM stage Ⅳ, respectively. (2) Analysis of influencing factors for No.253 lymph node metastasis in patients with middle and low rectal cancer. Results of univariate analysis showed that tumor T staging, tumor N staging, tumor TNM staging, tumor differentiation degree, the distance from distal margin of tumor to anal margin were related factors for No.253 lymph node metastasis in patients with middle and low rectal cancer (χ²=28.48, 44.58, 172.62, 227.67, 34.57, P<0.05). Results of multivariate analysis showed that tumor T staging as stage T4, tumor N staging as stage N2, tumor TNM staging as stage Ⅳ, low differentiated tumor, the distance from distal margin of tumor to anal margin as ≥6 cm and <8 cm, 8‒10 cm were independent risk factors for No.253 lymph node metastasis in patients with middle and low rectal cancer (odds ratio=2.74, 3.48, 10.72, 21.47, 1.92, 3.67, 95% confidence intervals as 1.91‒3.92, 2.42‒4.98, 7.36‒15.62, 10.33‒44.60, 1.27‒2.91, 2.31‒5.81, P<0.05).
    Conclusions The risk of No.253 lymph node metastasis is relatively high in middle and low rectal cancer patients with long distance from distal margin of tumor to anal margin, low differentiated tumor, and in high TNM stages. Tumor T staging as stage T4, tumor N staging as stage N2, tumor TNM staging as stage Ⅳ, low differentiated tumor, the distance from distal margin of tumor to anal margin as ≥6 cm and <8 cm, 8‒10 cm are independent risk factors for No.253 lymph node metastasis in patients with middle and low rectal cancer.

     

/

返回文章
返回