腹腔开放治疗急性胰腺炎合并腹腔间隙综合征的临床疗效和预后影响因素分析

Clinical efficacy and prognostic influencing factors of open abdomen technique for acute pancreatitis with abdominal compartment syndrome

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨腹腔开放治疗急性胰腺炎合并腹腔间隙综合征(ACS)的临床疗效和预后影响因素。
    方法 采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2013年1月至2020年12月国内6家医院收治的186例(解放军联勤保障部队第910医院65例,温州医科大学附属第一医院46例,福建省立医院33例,福建医科大学附属第二医院31例,泉州医学高等专科学校附属人民医院7例、石狮市总医院4例)急性胰腺炎合并ACS患者的临床资料;男142例,女44例;年龄为(43±8)岁。观察指标:(1)患者腹腔开放治疗情况。(2)不同治疗结局患者临床特征分析。(3)不同治疗结局患者尿量、乳酸、肠内营养摄入量及序贯器官衰竭(SOFA)评分的变化趋势。(4)患者预后影响因素分析。正态分布的计量资料以x±s表示,组间比较采用t检验。偏态分布的计量资料以MQ1,Q3)表示,组间比较采用Mann⁃Whitney U检验。计数资料以绝对数表示,组间比较采用χ²检验或连续性校正χ²检验。重复测量数据采用重复测量方差分析。相关性检验采用Spearman相关性分析。单因素分析采用COX回归模型,多因素分析采用COX向前逐步回归模型。
    结果 (1)患者腹腔开放治疗情况。186例患者腹腔开放治疗前腹内压、氧合指数、乳酸、SOFA评分分别为(23.3±1.9)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)、(121±24)mmHg、(5.0±3.4)mmol/L、(10.4±3.6)分;治疗后168 h上述指标分别为(11.2±2.9)mmHg、(222±38)mmHg、(3.2±2.1)mmol/L、(4.4±2.3)分;两者上述指标时间效应比较,差异均有统计学意义(F时间=855.26,208.50,174.91,208.47,P<0.05)。(2)不同治疗结局患者临床特征分析。186例患者中,166例住院期间生存并顺利出院,20例住院期间死亡。腹腔开放治疗前,住院期间生存患者年龄、SOFA评分、术前ACS持续时间、乳酸分别为(41±7)岁、(9.4±3.4)分、13(10,21)h、(4.2±0.6)mmol/L;死亡患者上述指标分别为(45±6)岁、(11.5±2.4)分、65(39,84)h、(5.2±0.5)mmol/L;两者上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=-2.10,-2.71,Z=-5.36,t=-7.16,P<0.05)。腹腔开放治疗后,住院期间生存患者术后急性胃肠损伤持续时间,连续肾脏替代治疗时间,脱离机械通气时间,血管活性药物使用时间,早期确定性关腹,术后肠瘘类型(无肠瘘、高位肠瘘、低位肠瘘)分别为4(2,6)d,4(3,7)d,34(21,41)d,3(2,6)d,126例,131、23、12例;死亡患者上述指标分别为13(10,17)d,10(8,18)d,0(0,3)d,8(6,12)d,1例,2、15、3例;两者上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(Z=-5.60,-3.75,-3.64,-3.06,χ²=41.43,45.86,P<0.05)。(3)不同治疗结局患者尿量、乳酸、肠内营养摄入量及SOFA评分的变化趋势。腹腔开放治疗前,住院期间生存患者尿量、乳酸、肠内营养摄入量、SOFA评分分别为(0.29±0.10)mL/(kg·h)、(4.2±0.6)mmol/L、0.0 kcal/(kg·d)、(9.4±3.4)分,治疗后168 h上述指标分别为(2.22±0.15)mL/(kg·h)、(1.9±0.7)mmol/L、(20.7±2.9)kcal/(kg·d)、(3.7±2.2)分;住院期间死亡患者上述指标分别为(0.28±0.08)mL/(kg·h)、(5.2±0.5)mmol/L、0.0 kcal/(kg·d)、(11.5±2.4)分,治疗后168 h上述指标分别为(0.28±0.09)mL/(kg·h)、(7.7±0.8)mmol/L、(4.6±1.8)kcal/(kg·d)、(12.4±2.1)分;两者上述指标时间效应比较,差异均有统计学意义(F时间=425.57,188.59,394.84,37.52,P<0.05);两者上述指标不同时间点与治疗结局存在交互效应(F交互=383.14,233.04,169.83,36.61,P<0.05);两者上述指标组间比较,差异均有统计学意义(F组间=2 739.56,877.98,542.05,240.85,P<0.05)。(4)患者预后影响因素分析。单因素分析结果显示:年龄、SOFA评分、术前ACS持续时间、降钙素原、乳酸、术后肠瘘类型(高位肠瘘)、腹腔出血、术后急性胃肠损伤持续时间、连续肾脏替代治疗时间、血管活性药物使用时间、早期确定性关腹是影响腹腔开放治疗患者预后的相关因素(风险比=1.07,1.18,1.39,1.16,8.25,12.26,2.83,1.29,1.56,1.41,0.02,95%可信区间为1.00~1.15,1.45~2.27,1.22~1.57,1.02~1.32,1.75~38.90,7.37~41.23,1.16~6.93,1.22~1.37,1.23~1.99,1.08~1.84,0.00~0.16,P<0.05)。多因素分析结果显示:术前ACS持续时间延长、术后高位肠瘘、术后急性胃肠损伤持续时间延长是影响腹腔开放治疗患者预后的独立危险因素(风险比=1.05,7.95,1.17,95%可信区间为1.01~1.32,2.05~30.87,1.13~1.95,P<0.05),早期确定性关腹是独立保护因素(风险比=0.10,95%可信区间为0.01~0.89,P<0.05)。Spearman相关性分析结果显示:术前ACS持续时间与术前SOFA评分呈正相关(r=0.71,P<0.05)。
    结论 腹腔开放治疗急性胰腺炎合并ACS患者有效。术前ACS持续时间延长、术后高位肠瘘、术后急性胃肠损伤持续时间延长是影响患者预后的独立危险因素,早期确定性关腹是独立保护因素。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and prognostic influencing factors of open abdomen technique for acute pancreatitis with abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS).
    Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 186 patients of acute pancreatitis with ACS who were admitted to 6 hospitals, including 65 cases in the 910th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese People′s Liberation Army, 46 cases in the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 33 cases in the Fujian Provincial Hospital, 31 cases in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 7 cases in the People′s Hospital Affiliated to Quanzhou Medical College, 4 cases in the Shishi General Hospital, from January 2013 to December 2020 were collected. There were 142 males and 44 females, aged (43±8)years. Observation indica-tors: (1) patients conditions after being treatment with open abdomen technique; (2) analysis of clinical characteristics in patients with different treatment outcomes; (3) changing trend of the volume of urine output, levels of lactic acid, levels of enteral nutrient intake and the sequential organ failure score in patients with different treatment outcomes; (4) influencing factors for prognosis of patients. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD, and compari-son between groups was analyzed using the t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(Q1,Q3), and comparison between groups was analyzed using the Mann‑Whitney U test. Count data were described as absolute numbers, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi‑square test or the continuity correction chi‑square test. Repeated measurement data were analyzed using the repeated ANOVA. Spearman correlation analysis was used for correlation analyses. The COX regression model was used for univariate analysis and COX regression model with forward regression was used for multivariate analysis.
    Results (1) Patients conditions after being treatment with open abdomen technique. Intra‑abdominal pressure, oxygena-tion index, levels of lactic acid and sequential organ failure score of the 186 patients were (23.3±1.9)mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), (121±24)mmHg, (5.0±3.4)mmol/L and 10.4±3.6 before the treatment with open abdomen technique and (11.2±2.9)mmHg, (222±38)mmHg, (3.2±2.1)mmol/L and 4.4±2.3 at postoperative 168 hours, showing significant differences in time effects before and after the treatment (Ftime=855.26,208.50, 174.91,208.47, P<0.05). (2) Analysis of clinical characteristics in patients with different treatment outcomes. Of the 186 patients, 166 cases survived and were discharged, and 20 cases died during hospitalization. Age, sequential organ failure score, duration of ACS and levels of lactic acid during hospitalization before the treatment with open abdomen technique were (41±7)years, 9.4±3.4, 13(10,21)hours and (4.2±0.6)mmol/L in surviving patients, versus (45±6)years, 11.5±2.4, 65(39,84)hours and (5.2±0.5)mmol/L in dead patients, respectively, showing significant differences between them (t=-2.10, -2.71, Z=-5.36, t=-7.16, P<0.05). Duration of postoperative acute gastro-intestinal injury, duration of continuous renal replacement therapy, time to liberation from mech-anical ventilation, duration of vasoactive drugs therapy, cases undergoing early abdominal closure, cases without intestinal fistula or with postoperative high-order intestinal fistula and low‑order intestinal fistula during hospitalization after the treatment with open abdomen technique were 4(2,6)days, 4(3,7)days, 34(21,41)days, 3(2,6)days, 126, 131, 23, 12 in surviving patients, versus 13(10,17)days, 10(8,18)days, 0(0,3)days, 8(6,12)days, 1, 2, 15, 3 in dead patients, respectively, showing significant differences between them (Z=-5.60, -3.75, -3.64, -3.06, χ²=41.43, 45.86, P<0.05). (3) Changing trend of the volume of urine output, levels of lactic acid, levels of enteral nutrient intake and the sequential organ failure score in patients with different treatment outcomes. The volume of urine output, levels of lactic acid, levels of enteral nutrient intake and the sequential organ failure score in surviving patients during hospitalization were (0.29±0.10)mL/(kg·h), (4.2±0.6)mmol/L, 0.0 kcal/(kg·d) and 9.4±3.4 before the treatment with open abdomen technique and (2.22±0.15)mL/(kg·h), (1.9±0.7)mmol/L, (20.7±2.9)kcal/(kg·d) and 3.7±2.2 at postoperative 168 hours. The above indicators in dead patients during hospitalization were (0.28±0.08)mL/(kg·h), (5.2±0.5)mmol/L, 0.0kcal/(kg·d) and 11.5±2.4 before the treatment with open abdomen technique and (0.28±0.09)mL/(kg·h), (7.7±0.8)mmol/L, (4.6±1.8)kcal/(kg·d) and 12.4±2.1 at postoperative 168 hours. There were significant differences in time effects in the above indicators in surviving patients and dead patients before and after the treatment with open abdomen technique (Ftime=425.57, 188.59, 394.84, 37.52, P<0.05). There were interactive effects between the above indicators and the treatment outcome at different time points (Finteraction=383.14, 233.04, 169.83, 36.61, P<0.05). There were signifi-cant differences in the change trends of the above indicators between the surviving patients and the dead patients during hospitalization (Fgouprs=2 739.56, 877.98, 542.05, 240.85, P<0.05). (4) Influen-cing factors for prognosis of patients. Results of univariate analysis showed that age, sequential organ failure score, duration of ACS before surgery, procalcitonin, lactic acid, postoperative high-order intestinal fistula, abdominal hemorrhage, duration of postoperative acute gastrointestinal injury, duration of continuous renal replacement therapy, duration of vasoactive drugs therapy, early abdominal closure were related factors influencing prognosis of patients under-going treatment with open abdomen technique (hazard ratio=1.07, 1.18, 1.39, 1.16, 8.25, 12.26, 2.83, 1.29, 1.56, 1.41, 0.02, 95% confidence interval as 1.00-1.15, 1.45-2.27, 1.22-1.57, 1.02-1.32, 1.75-38.90, 7.37-41.23, 1.16-6.93, 1.22-1.37, 1.23-1.99, 1.08-1.84, 0.00-0.16, P<0.05). Results of multivariate analysis showed that extended duration of ACS before surgery, postoperative high‑order intestinal fistula and extended duration of postoperative acute gastrointestinal injury were independent risk factors influencing prognosis of patients undergoing treatment with open abdomen technique (hazard ratio=1.05, 7.95, 1.17, 95% confidence interval as 1.01-1.32, 2.05-30.87, 1.13-1.95, P<0.05) and early abdominal closure was an independent protective factor (hazard ratio=0.10, 95% confidence interval as 0.01-0.89, P<0.05). Results of Spearman correlation analysis showed that duration of ACS was positively correlated with sequential organ failure score before surgery (r=0.71, P<0.05).
    Conclusions Open abdomen technique is effective for acute pancreatitis with ACS. Extended duration of ACS before surgery, postoperative high‑order intestinal fistula and extended duration of postoperative acute gastrointestinal injury are independent risk factors for prognosis of patients during hospitalization and early abdominal closure is an independent protective factor.

     

/

返回文章
返回