劈离式多米诺供肝辅助性肝移植的临床价值

Clinical value of split domino donor auxiliary liver transplantation

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨劈离式多米诺供肝辅助性肝移植的临床价值。
    方法 采用回顾性描述性研究方法。收集南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院2018年9月收治的3例、外院收治的1例肝移植受者的临床病理资料。病例1,男,22岁,诊断为Ⅱ型瓜氨酸血症(CTLN2);病例2(外院收治),男,59岁,诊断为酒精性肝硬化失代偿期;病例3,女,52岁,诊断为肝右叶肝细胞癌;病例4,女,51岁,诊断为肝右叶肝细胞癌。1例脑‑心死亡供器官肝脏获取后离体劈离分成左半肝和右半肝(不含肝中静脉),分别行改良背驼式肝移植和经典原位肝移植植入病例1和病例2。病例1的肝脏在体原位劈离为左半肝和右半肝。病例3和病例4均行扩大右半肝切除术后。病例3将病例1的左半肝行背驼式辅助肝移植,病例4将病例1右半肝行背驼式辅助肝移植。观察指标:(1)术中情况。(2)随访情况。采用门诊和电话方式进行随访,了解受者肝功能、肝脏影像学检查表现、并发症、生存情况。随访时间截至2021年10月。
    结果 (1)术中情况:病例1、病例3、病例4均顺利完成手术,手术时间分别为400、370、390 min,术中出血量分别为600、1 300、1 600 mL,供肝冷缺血时间分别为230、152、135 min,移植物受者体重比率为1.2%、0.8%、1.1%。(2)随访情况:3例受者肝移植术后经B超检查均提示血流正常且痊愈出院,均获得术后1、6、12个月随访。病例1、病例3、病例4肝移植后1周肝功能良好且血氨、瓜氨酸浓度正常。病例1和病例3术后肝脏影像学检查均正常,病例4肝脏影像学检查结果示门静脉盗血致移植肝萎缩。①病例1肝移植术前、术后1 d、术后2 d、术后3 d、术后7 d、术后10 d、术后6个月、术后1年丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)分别为22.8、404.1、355.5、289.6、31.0、23.1、42.1、25.8 U/L,天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)分别为31.5、517.7、327.6、172.9、15.9、21.4、47.5、29.7 U/L,总胆红素(TBil)分别为3.8、92.1、87.4 、79.7、90.1、130.6、33.8、25.4 μmol/L,直接胆红素(DBil)分别为2.3、47.0、44.1、47.1、57.4、70.9、24.7、9.7 μmol/L。术前瓜氨酸为999.0 μmol/L、血氨为196.0 μmol/L,术后瓜氨酸为14.6 μmol/L、血氨为9.0 μmol/L。病例1术后未发生肝移植相关并发症,已随访3年,仍生存。②病例3肝移植术前、术后1 d、术后2 d、术后3 d、术后7 d、术后10 d、术后6个月、术后1年ALT分别为21.3、143.9、182.0、132.0、17.2、10.1、17.6、16.8 U/L,AST分别为20.0、291.0、227.5、106.4、15.8、10.8、17.1、19.4 U/L,TBil分别为6.8、50.9、45.0、34.0、32.4、22.3、12.8、14.9 μmol/L,DBil分别为2.5、18.4、17.2、14.9、14.8、12.1、3.6、4.4 μmol/L。术后瓜氨酸为24.9 μmol/L、血氨为16.0 μmol/L。病例3术后未发生肝移植相关并发症,已随访3年,仍生存。③病例4肝移植术前、术后1 d、术后2 d、术后3 d、术后7 d、术后10 d、术后6个月、术后1年的ALT分别为35.0、268.7、682.0、425.8、57.5、34.0、29.4、18.1 U/L,AST分别为37.0、419.1、436.2、139.5、35.2、32.4、54.7、32.8 U/L,TBil分别为7.1、64.2、41.4、17.6、34.2、48.7、14.1、21.8 μmol/L,DBil分别为2.8、18.9、16.1、6.0、14.6、26.7、3.9、11.8 μmol/L。术后瓜氨酸为8.4 μmol/L、血氨为47.0 μmol/L。病例4肝右叶移植物术后1周由于门静脉右支盗血而出现萎缩,B超检查提示肝动脉和肝静脉回流均通畅,术后3个月停用免疫抑制剂,随访期间未发生排斥反应、胆汁漏、胆道狭窄、血栓形成、血管狭窄等并发症,术后19个月因肺转移死亡。
    结论 劈离式多米诺供肝辅助性肝移植可用于治疗代谢性肝病和晚期肝细胞癌。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the clinical value of split domino donor auxiliary liver transplantation.
    Methods The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinco-pathological data of 3 liver transplantation recipients who were admitted to Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School and 1 liver transplantation recipient who was admitted to external hospital in September 2018 were collected. The first case was male, aged 22 years, who was diagnosed as type II citrullinemia (CTLN2). The second case undergoing liver transplantation in external hospital was male, aged 59 years, who was diagnosed as decompensated alcoholic cirrhosis. The third case was female, aged 52 years, who was diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma of right lobe of liver. The fourth case was female, aged 51 years, who was diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma of right lobe of liver. The donor liver from a brain and cardiac death donor was split in vitro into the left liver and the right liver, in which the right liver without middle hepatic vein, and the modified piggyback liver transplantation using the left liver and the classical orthotropic liver transplantation using the right liver was conducted on the first and the second case, respectively. The original liver of the first case was split in vivo into the left liver and the right liver, and the piggyback auxiliary liver transplantation using the left liver and the piggyback auxiliary liver transplantation using the right liver was conducted on the third and the fourth case who underwent extended right hemihepatectomy, respectively. Observation indicators: (1) intraoperative situations; (2) follow‑up. Follow‑up was conducted using outpatient examination and telephone interview to detect liver function, liver imaging, complication and survival of recipients up to October 2021.
    Results (1) Intraoperative situations. Liver transplantation was conducted successfully on the first, third and fourth case, with the operation time, the volume of intraoperative blood loss, the donor liver cold ischemia time, the graft‑to‑recipient weight ratio were 400 minutes, 370 minutes, 390 minutes, 600 mL, 1 300 mL, 1 600 mL, 230 minutes, 152 minutes, 135 minutes, 1.2%, 0.8%, 1.1%. (2) Follow‑up. B‑ultrasound examination of the first, third and fourth case after liver transplantation showed that the blood flow was normal, and all the 3 cases discharged and were followed up at postoperative 1, 6 and 12 month. The liver function, the level of blood ammonia and citrulline were normal of the first, third and fourth case at postoperative 1 week. Imaging examina-tion showed normal liver morphology of the first and third case, and a transplanted liver atrophy caused by portal vein steal of the fourth case. ① The level of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBil), direct bilirubin (DBil) of the first case before liver transplantation, at postoperative 1 day, 2 day, 3 day, 7 day, 10 day, 6 month and 1 year were 22.8 U/L, 404.1 U/L, 355.5 U/L, 289.6 U/L, 31.0 U/L, 23.1 U/L, 42.1 U/L and 25.8 U/L, 31.5 U/L, 517.7 U/L, 327.6 U/L, 172.9 U/L, 15.9 U/L, 21.4 U/L, 47.5 U/L and 29.7 U/L, 3.8 μmol/L, 92.1 μmol/L, 87.4 μmol/L, 79.7 μmol/L, 90.1 μmol/L, 130.6 μmol/L, 33.8 μmol/L and 25.4 μmol/L, 2.3 μmol/L, 47.0 μmol/L, 44.1 μmol/L, 47.1 μmol/L, 57.4 μmol/L, 70.9 μmol/L, 24.7 μmol/L and 9.7 μmol/L, respectively. The level of citrulline and blood ammonia of the first case before and after liver transplantation were 999.0 μmol/L, 196.0 μmol/L and 14.6 μmol/L, 9.0 μmol/L, respectively. The first case was followed up for 3 years and survived without any liver transplantation related complication. ② The level of ALT, AST, TBil, DBil of the third case before liver transplantation, at postoperative 1 day, 2 day, 3 day, 7 day, 10 day, 6 month and 1 year were 21.3 U/L, 143.9 U/L, 182.0 U/L, 132.0 U/L, 17.2 U/L, 10.1 U/L, 17.6 U/L and 16.8 U/L,20.0 U/L, 291.0 U/L, 227.5 U/L, 106.4 U/L, 15.8 U/L, 10.8 U/L, 17.1 U/L and 19.4 U/L, 6.8 μmol/L, 50.9 μmol/L, 45.0 μmol/L, 34.0 μmol/L, 32.4 μmol/L, 22.3 μmol/L, 12.8 μmol/L and 14.9 μmol/L, 2.5 μmol/L, 18.4 μmol/L, 17.2 μmol/L, 14.9 μmol/L, 14.8 μmol/L, 12.1 μmol/L, 3.6 μmol/L and 4.4 μmol/L. The level of citrulline and blood ammonia of the third case after liver transplantation were 24.9 μmol/L and 16.0 μmol/L. The third case was followed up for 3 years and survived without any liver transplantation related complication. ③ The level of ALT, AST, TBil, DBil of the fourth case before liver transplantation, at postoperative 1 day, 2 day, 3 day, 7 day, 10 day, 6 month and 1 year were 35.0 U/L, 268.7 U/L, 682.0 U/L, 425.8 U/L, 57.5 U/L, 34.0 U/L, 29.4 U/L and 18.1 U/L, 37.0 U/L, 419.1 U/L, 436.2 U/L, 139.5 U/L, 35.2 U/L, 32.4 U/L, 54.7 U/L and 32.8 U/L, 7.1 μmol/L, 64.2 μmol/L, 41.4 μmol/L, 17.6 μmol/L, 34.2 μmol/L, 48.7 μmol/L, 14.1 μmol/L and 21.8 μmol/L, 2.8 μmol/L, 18.9 μmol/L, 16.1 μmol/L, 6.0 μmol/L, 14.6 μmol/L, 26.7 μmol/L, 3.9 μmol/L, 11.8 μmol/L. The level of citrulline and blood ammonia of the fourth case after liver transplantation were 8.4 μmol/L and 47.0 μmol/L. One week after surgery, the transplanted right liver of the fourth case occurred atrophy due to blood stealing from the right branch of the portal vein. B‑ultrasound examination showed that the reflux of the hepatic artery and hepatic vein was unobstructed. Immunosuppressants were discontinued 3 months after operation on the fourth case and there was no complication such as rejection, bile leakage, biliary stricture, thrombosis and vascular stricture during follow‑up. The fourth case died of lung metastasis 19 months after operation.
    Conclusion Split domino donor auxiliary liver transplantation can be used for the treatment of metabolic liver disease and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

     

/

返回文章
返回