肝细胞癌肝移植后肺转移影响因素分析及其列线图预测模型的应用价值

Analysis of influencing factors for lung metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation and application value of its nomogram prediction model

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨肝细胞癌肝移植后肺转移影响因素及其列线图预测模型的应用价值。
    方法 采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2015年1月至2019年6月复旦大学附属中山医院收治的339例肝细胞癌行肝移植后肺转移病人的临床病理资料;男299例,女40例;中位年龄为54岁,年龄范围为23~73岁。339例病人通过计算机产生随机数方法以2∶1比例分为训练集226例和验证集113例。病人均行经典同种异体原位肝移植。观察指标:(1)训练集和验证集病人临床病理资料分析。(2)随访情况。(3)肝细胞癌肝移植后肺转移影响因素分析。(4)肝细胞癌肝移植后肺转移列线图预测模型的建立及验证。采用电话或门诊方式进行随访。了解病人肺转移情况。随访时间截至2020年11月。正态分布的计量资料以x±s表示,组间比较采用t检验;偏态分布的计量资料以MP25,P75)或M(范围)表示,组间比较采用Mann‑Whitney U检验。计数资料以绝对数或百分比表示,组间比较采用χ²检验。采用Kaplan⁃Meier法计算肺转移率和绘制肺转移曲线,采用Log‑rank检验进行生存分析。采用COX比例风险模型进行单因素和多因素分析。基于多因素分析结果构建列线图预测模型。采用一致性指数(C‑index)及受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)对列线图模型的预测准确性进行评价。绘制校准曲线,评估模型的预测误差。
    结果 (1)训练集和验证集病人临床病理资料分析:训练集和验证集病人一般资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(2)随访情况:训练集226例病人与验证集113例病人均获得随访。训练集病人随访时间为5.2~69.0个月,中位随访时间为29.3个月;验证集病人随访时间为4.3~69.0个月,中位随访时间为30.4个月。截至末次随访时间,训练集病人中21.24%(48/226)发生肺转移,发生肺转移中位时间为8.5个月;验证集病人中19.47%(22/113)发生肺转移,发生肺转移中位时间为7.8个月。训练集和验证集病人术后肺转移发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ²=0.144,P>0.05)。(3)肝细胞癌肝移植后肺转移影响因素分析。单因素分析结果显示:年龄、甲胎蛋白、肿瘤长径、肿瘤分化程度、血管侵犯、系统性免疫炎症指数、术后治疗是影响肝细胞癌肝移植后肺转移的相关因素(风险比=0.465,3.413,1.140,3.791,2.524,2.053,1.833,95%可信区间为0.263~0.822,1.740~6.695,1.091~1.191,1.763~8.154,1.903~3.349,1.047~4.027,1.038~3.238,P<0.05)。多因素分析结果显示:年龄、肿瘤长径、血管侵犯是肝细胞癌肝移植后肺转移的独立影响因素(风险比=0.462,1.076,2.170,95%可信区间为0.253~0.843,1.013~1.143,1.545~3.048,P<0.05)。(4)肝细胞癌肝移植后肺转移列线图预测模型的建立及验证:肝细胞癌肝移植后肺转移列线图模型在训练集C‑index为0.810,95%可信区间为0.758~0.863;在验证集C‑index为0.802,95%可信区间为0.723~0.881,说明其具有良好的区分能力。训练集中,6个月、1年、2年列线图预测模型ROC的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.815(95%可信区间为0.725~0.905)、0.863(95%可信区间为0.809~0.917)、0.835(95%可信区间为0.771~0.900)。验证集中,6个月、1年、2年列线图预测模型ROC的AUC分别为0.873(95%可信区间为0.801~0.945)、0.858(95%可信区间为0.760~0.956)、0.841(95%可信区间为0.737~0.945)。说明该模型具有良好的预测能力。列线图模型公式=33.300 06+(-33.300 06)×年龄(≤50岁=0,>50岁=1)+2.857 14×肿瘤长径(cm)+31.585 71×血管侵犯(M0=0,M1=1,M2=2,肉眼癌栓=3)。模型风险评分最佳阈值为77.5分,风险评分≥77.5分为高危组,风险评分<77.5分为低危组。训练集中,高危组和低危组病人6个月、1年、2年肝移植后肺转移率分别为16.7%、39.2%、46.4%和1.4%、4.1%、6.9%,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(χ²=54.86,P<0.05)。验证集中,高危组和低危组病人6个月、1年、2年肝移植后肺转移率分别为17.6%、29.0%、39.5%和0、3.1%、4.8%,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(χ²=25.29,P<0.05)。
    结论 年龄、肿瘤长径和血管侵犯是肝细胞癌肝移植后肺转移的独立影响因素;以此构建列线图预测模型可较为准确地预测肝细胞癌肝移植后肺转移发生风险。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the influencing factors for lung metastasis of hepato-cellular carcinoma after liver transplantation and application value of its nomogram prediction model.
    Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 339 hepatocellular carcinoma patients with lung metastasis after liver transplantation who were admitted to Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University from January 2015 to June 2019 were collected. There were 299 males and 40 females, aged from 23 to 73 years, with a median age of 54 years. According to the random numbers showed in the computer, all 339 patients were divided into training dataset consisting of 226 and validation dataset consisting of 113, with a ratio of 2:1. All patients underwent classic orthotopic liver transplantation. Observation indicators: (1) analysis of clinicopathological data of patients in the training dataset and validation dataset; (2) follow-up; (3) analysis of influencing factors for lung metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplanta-tion; (4) construction and evaluation of nomogram prediction model for lung metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. Follow-up was conducted using outpatient examination and telephone interview to detect lung metastasis of patients up to November 2020. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD, and comparison between groups was conducted using the paired t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(P25,P75) or M(range), and comparison between groups was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test. Count data were described as absolute number or percentages, and comparison between groups was conducted using the chi-square test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate lung metastasis rate and draw lung metastasis curve. The Log-rank test was used for survival analysis. The COX proportional hazard model was used for univariate and multivariate analysis. Based on the results of multivariate analysis, the nomogram prediction model was constructed. The prediction accuracy of the nomogram model was evaluated using C-index and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The calibration curve was used to evaluate the prediction error of the model.
    Results (1) Analysis of clinicopathological data of patients in the training dataset and validation dataset: there was no significant difference in general data between patients in the training dataset and validation dataset (P>0.05). (2) Follow-up: 226 patients in training dataset and 113 patients in validation dataset were followed up. The follow-up time of training dataset was 5.2 to 69.0 months, with a median follow-up time of 29.3 months, and the follow-up time of validation dataset was 4.3 to 69.0 months, with a median follow-up time of 30.4 months. Up to the last follow-up, 48 cases of the training dataset and 22 cases of the validation dataset had lung metastasis, with the incidence and median time of lung metastasis were 21.24%(48/226), 19.47%(22/113) and 8.5 months, 7.8 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in lung metastasis between patients in the training dataset and validation dataset (χ2=0.144, P>0.05). (3) Analysis of influencing factors for lung metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: results of univariate analysis showed that age, alpha fetoprotein, tumor diameter, tumor differentiation degree, vascular invasion, systemic immune inflammation index and postoperative treatment were related factors for lung metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation (hazard ratio=0.465, 3.413, 1.140, 3.791, 2.524, 2.053, 1.833, 95% confidence interval as 0.263‒0.822, 1.740‒6.695, 1.091‒1.191, 1.763‒8.154, 1.903‒3.349, 1.047‒4.027, 1.038‒3.238, P<0.05) . Results of multivariate analysis showed that age, tumor diameter and vascular invasion were independent influencing factors for lung metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation (hazard ratio=0.462, 1.076, 2.170, 95% confidence interval as 0.253‒0.843, 1.013‒1.143, 1.545‒3.048, P<0.05). (4) Construction and evaluation of nomogram prediction model for lung metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: the C-index was 0.810 (95% confidence interval as 0.758‒0.863) and 0.802 (95% confidence interval as 0.723‒0.881) of the nomogram prediction model for lung metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplanta-tion in the training dataset and validation dataset, respectively, showing good discrimination ability. The area under ROC of 0.5-, 1- and 2-year nomogram prediction model in the training dataset and the validation dataset were 0.815(95% confidence interval as 0.725‒0.905), 0.863(95% confidence interval as 0.809‒0.917), 0.835(95% confidence interval as 0.771‒0.900)and 0.873(95% confidence interval as 0.801‒0.945), 0.858(95% confidence interval as 0.760‒0.956), 0.841(95% confidence interval as 0.737‒0.945), respectively, which illustrated that the model had good predictive ability. The formula of nomogram prediction model=33.300 06+(‒33.300 06)×age(≤50 years=0, >50 years=1)+2.857 14×tumor diameter (cm)+31.585 71×vascular invasion (M0 stage of microvascular invasion staging=0, M1 stage of microvascular invasion staging=1, M2 stage of microvascular invasion staging=2, visible tumor thrombus=3). The optimal threshold of nomogram risk score was 77.5. Patients with risk score ≥77.5 were assigned into high risk group, and patients with risk score <77.5 were assigned into low risk group. The 0.5-,1- and 2-year lung metastasis rate of patients in the high risk group and low risk group of the training dataset were 16.7%, 39.2%, 46.4% and 1.4%, 4.1%, 6.9%, respectively, showing a significant difference between the two groups (χ2=54.86, P<0.05). The 0.5-,1- and 2-year lung metastasis rate of patients in the high risk group and low risk group of the validation dataset were 17.6%, 29.0%, 39.5% and 0, 3.1%, 4.8%, respectively, showing a significant difference between the two groups (χ2=25.29, P<0.05).
    Conclusions Age, tumor diameter and vascular invasion are independent influencing factors for lung metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. The nomogram prediction model based on age, tumor diameter and vascular invasion can predict risk of lung metastasis for hepatocellular carcinoma patients after liver transplantation accurately.

     

/

返回文章
返回